Well I stand before you with mixed emotions, excited that the campaign I have been working on night and day for the last week is live but some what pussy hurt that there were no conversions on my Adcopy split testing. I'm roughly five weeks old in the world of AM and finally released my first PPC campaign last night, I took the recommend approach and decided to run with a competitive popular niche - Dieting / Weight Loss. I'm offering a level of transparency in the efforts to have the opportunity to mature in AM, its been quite a few years since I have actually been that dedicated in something that I will spend 20 hours a day and often forget to eat and well going out has become a thing of the past.
Like most new starters giving AM 110% I'm spending a large portion of time reading blogs and scouring WickedFire for tips and tricks that hopefully would shed some light on what can best be described as a dark padded room. Stumbling upon the thread ( http://www.wickedfire.com/affiliate...eted-ads-get-highly-converting-campaigns.html ) old mate goes on to mention that you should be targeting all four personalities with your adcopys. "Huzzzar!" I said, what better for my first split testing attempt than to create a small budgeted campaign on each of the four personalities in the efforts to see what works and what doesn't. Hours later after I have created Humanistic, Spontaneous, Competitive and Methodical campaigns with a selection of what I think are relevant Adcopys and set a budget of $50 per campaign with a CPC of .80.
Now the landing page, the end result in my opinion is a well laid out design similar enough to the offers site in the efforts to not shock the prospect after action, but unique enough to not get me into any trouble. I guess its worth adding that the offer I'm promoting has a mid $20's lead conversion rate and is brand new on CJ, I have had a great deal of trouble getting approved on ANY network either due to my inexperience or geographical location (Australia) so my only options have been CJ, Linkshare, Shareasale. The offer in question is provided on a free 30 day trial and has specific instructions that their brand name can't be used in PPC, so I've used a very extensive list of keywords associated with diet / weight loss (60 keywords actually).
To appeal to the different personalities I have also multiple cue "key" images on the LP, seeing as the offer is associated with Weight Loss all the images are referencing that; Attractive Female holding a pair of fatty pants, repeat for male and also an active 70 year old and a doctor. All images are easily changed around with the aid of php dynamic links ie) /?=S1 (Personality reference = Spontaneous / SaleCopy 1).
Okay so just to recap here I have my four campaigns configured (Search network only) associated to the personalities, I have a CPC set of .80 and just out of interest I created a Content network campaign with my four "favourite" ads and set a CPC of .16. The campaign was initiated this morning (7am EST) and here are the findings;
PPC Provider - MSN Adcenter
Campaign Name - ST - 1 (Methodical)
Impressions - 0
CTR - 0
Avg CPC - 0
Campaign Name - ST - 2 (Spontaneous)
Impressions - 75
CTR - 0
Avg CPC - 0
Campaign Name - ST - 3 (Humanistic)
Impressions - 25,000
Clicks - 77
CTR - .31
Avg CPC - .46c
Campaign Name - ST - 4 (Competitive)
Impressions - 25,000
Clicks - 78
CTR - .31
Avg CPC - .60c
Question 1) Why have ST 1 and 2 not been touched? All of them are set with the same keywords and budget including CPC and started at the same time, I have since paused 1 and 2 in the efforts to give them a chance. I would have thought MSN would be hungry for the cash and pushed them all through at the same time?
Now seeing as though I have enough information on two campaigns to start removing Adcopies that provided little to no clicks, I'm a little troubled about the keywords side of things. Not surprisingly the biggest performers in keywords were;
Campaign Name - ST - 4 (Competitive)
Diet - 32 clicks
lose weight - 7 clicks
weight loss - 6 clicks
diet and weight loss - 6 clicks
diet plans - 6 clicks
losing weight - 5 clicks
Campaign Name - ST - 3 (Humanistic)
Diet - 28 clicks
weight loss - 9
lose weight - 7 clicks
weight loss programs - 7 clicks
diet plans - 4 clicks
Question 2) Do I now start removing the keywords which haven't returned any clicks? Or is the 12 hour test period just not long enough to provide any real data on keywords? Seeing as though the cycle hasn't been full completed with a day / night, maybe the fatties are a reclusive bunch and only surface in the night? Hmmmm.
Now just for interests sake I created a Adwords campaign limited to only two ads to see how my quality score was in relation to the big performing keywords. I might add their website is fucking slow to update, it still hasn't registered any clicks or impressions (12 hours) so I'm relying on Prosper202. I have imported the same wall of text keyword list that I was using on MSN and now I understand what you guys have been talking about, Quality Score you cunt.. I dunno if I'm pissed off at you or excited that there is so much room to move and that I have a great deal to learn, anyways here is a rough indication on how I've been rated in relation to QS.
Weight Loss / Lose Weight / Weight Loss - 7/10 - $1.15 CPC - Showing Ads
Diet - 4/10 - $1.25 Eligible - 2nd page chump
The rest are all around the 2/10 - 4/10 figure, now I don't know if I was naive about the whole situation or just uneducated. My initial understanding was you're in a bidding war with other interneters to see who has bigger pockets in the hassle they call Adwords. Boy was I wrong, my LP content is clearly not optimized for the vast majority of these keywords which has resulted in a pathetic QS. I have the option to pay a ridiculous CPC to play with the big boys though, but clearly my product isn't good enough to warrant that expenditure. I want to do EVERYTHING / ANYTHING possible to improve my QS, what would you suggest the correct steps? I'm a very process / methodical orientated person and find myself creating steps for the most mundane tasks so this will be no different.
1) Optimize LP content to reference keywords I'm trying to target. What's annoying is that I have no stats on "who" actually converts, do I try and identify with the most traffic orientated keywords? OR try and take advantage of long tail keywords which are more direct to my product. For the past week I have been sitting here rubbing my hands together thinking I will make bank, shit its a popular product that's supplied on a 30 day trial and with a mid $20's lead conversion.. How could I go wrong? Well clearly I have, roughly 50 people have actioned my LP and gone to the offers site which they haven't converted, is that the products fault or mine by not targeting the right person?
2) Change the short and long sale, or redesign my LP. What I would love is someone out there who has a fair bit of experience in LP's to take a look at it, I'm not prepared to show the LP publicly but I would really appreciate a clear sets of eyes that haven't been tainted from starring the shit out of it for days on end.
--
So that's it, sorry for the wall of text by this shit is in my head 24/7 so its great to get it out on paper.
Like most new starters giving AM 110% I'm spending a large portion of time reading blogs and scouring WickedFire for tips and tricks that hopefully would shed some light on what can best be described as a dark padded room. Stumbling upon the thread ( http://www.wickedfire.com/affiliate...eted-ads-get-highly-converting-campaigns.html ) old mate goes on to mention that you should be targeting all four personalities with your adcopys. "Huzzzar!" I said, what better for my first split testing attempt than to create a small budgeted campaign on each of the four personalities in the efforts to see what works and what doesn't. Hours later after I have created Humanistic, Spontaneous, Competitive and Methodical campaigns with a selection of what I think are relevant Adcopys and set a budget of $50 per campaign with a CPC of .80.
Now the landing page, the end result in my opinion is a well laid out design similar enough to the offers site in the efforts to not shock the prospect after action, but unique enough to not get me into any trouble. I guess its worth adding that the offer I'm promoting has a mid $20's lead conversion rate and is brand new on CJ, I have had a great deal of trouble getting approved on ANY network either due to my inexperience or geographical location (Australia) so my only options have been CJ, Linkshare, Shareasale. The offer in question is provided on a free 30 day trial and has specific instructions that their brand name can't be used in PPC, so I've used a very extensive list of keywords associated with diet / weight loss (60 keywords actually).
To appeal to the different personalities I have also multiple cue "key" images on the LP, seeing as the offer is associated with Weight Loss all the images are referencing that; Attractive Female holding a pair of fatty pants, repeat for male and also an active 70 year old and a doctor. All images are easily changed around with the aid of php dynamic links ie) /?=S1 (Personality reference = Spontaneous / SaleCopy 1).
Okay so just to recap here I have my four campaigns configured (Search network only) associated to the personalities, I have a CPC set of .80 and just out of interest I created a Content network campaign with my four "favourite" ads and set a CPC of .16. The campaign was initiated this morning (7am EST) and here are the findings;
PPC Provider - MSN Adcenter
Campaign Name - ST - 1 (Methodical)
Impressions - 0
CTR - 0
Avg CPC - 0
Campaign Name - ST - 2 (Spontaneous)
Impressions - 75
CTR - 0
Avg CPC - 0
Campaign Name - ST - 3 (Humanistic)
Impressions - 25,000
Clicks - 77
CTR - .31
Avg CPC - .46c
Campaign Name - ST - 4 (Competitive)
Impressions - 25,000
Clicks - 78
CTR - .31
Avg CPC - .60c
Question 1) Why have ST 1 and 2 not been touched? All of them are set with the same keywords and budget including CPC and started at the same time, I have since paused 1 and 2 in the efforts to give them a chance. I would have thought MSN would be hungry for the cash and pushed them all through at the same time?
Now seeing as though I have enough information on two campaigns to start removing Adcopies that provided little to no clicks, I'm a little troubled about the keywords side of things. Not surprisingly the biggest performers in keywords were;
Campaign Name - ST - 4 (Competitive)
Diet - 32 clicks
lose weight - 7 clicks
weight loss - 6 clicks
diet and weight loss - 6 clicks
diet plans - 6 clicks
losing weight - 5 clicks
Campaign Name - ST - 3 (Humanistic)
Diet - 28 clicks
weight loss - 9
lose weight - 7 clicks
weight loss programs - 7 clicks
diet plans - 4 clicks
Question 2) Do I now start removing the keywords which haven't returned any clicks? Or is the 12 hour test period just not long enough to provide any real data on keywords? Seeing as though the cycle hasn't been full completed with a day / night, maybe the fatties are a reclusive bunch and only surface in the night? Hmmmm.
Now just for interests sake I created a Adwords campaign limited to only two ads to see how my quality score was in relation to the big performing keywords. I might add their website is fucking slow to update, it still hasn't registered any clicks or impressions (12 hours) so I'm relying on Prosper202. I have imported the same wall of text keyword list that I was using on MSN and now I understand what you guys have been talking about, Quality Score you cunt.. I dunno if I'm pissed off at you or excited that there is so much room to move and that I have a great deal to learn, anyways here is a rough indication on how I've been rated in relation to QS.
Weight Loss / Lose Weight / Weight Loss - 7/10 - $1.15 CPC - Showing Ads
Diet - 4/10 - $1.25 Eligible - 2nd page chump
The rest are all around the 2/10 - 4/10 figure, now I don't know if I was naive about the whole situation or just uneducated. My initial understanding was you're in a bidding war with other interneters to see who has bigger pockets in the hassle they call Adwords. Boy was I wrong, my LP content is clearly not optimized for the vast majority of these keywords which has resulted in a pathetic QS. I have the option to pay a ridiculous CPC to play with the big boys though, but clearly my product isn't good enough to warrant that expenditure. I want to do EVERYTHING / ANYTHING possible to improve my QS, what would you suggest the correct steps? I'm a very process / methodical orientated person and find myself creating steps for the most mundane tasks so this will be no different.
1) Optimize LP content to reference keywords I'm trying to target. What's annoying is that I have no stats on "who" actually converts, do I try and identify with the most traffic orientated keywords? OR try and take advantage of long tail keywords which are more direct to my product. For the past week I have been sitting here rubbing my hands together thinking I will make bank, shit its a popular product that's supplied on a 30 day trial and with a mid $20's lead conversion.. How could I go wrong? Well clearly I have, roughly 50 people have actioned my LP and gone to the offers site which they haven't converted, is that the products fault or mine by not targeting the right person?
2) Change the short and long sale, or redesign my LP. What I would love is someone out there who has a fair bit of experience in LP's to take a look at it, I'm not prepared to show the LP publicly but I would really appreciate a clear sets of eyes that haven't been tainted from starring the shit out of it for days on end.
--
So that's it, sorry for the wall of text by this shit is in my head 24/7 so its great to get it out on paper.