Tracking 300 adgroups with Azoogle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jon12345

New member
Sep 14, 2006
187
0
0
Brighton, UK
Imagine you have 300 adgroups with Azoogle and you need to track each one for profitability. How do you go about it? Do you export a weeks worth of Azoogle data with the sub id's, print out the list and then manually match up each sub id with your Adgroup?

This seems extremely time consuming. Any better ways? Automated Processes? What do the top super affiliates do? Any time saving tips Help!!

Thanks,

Jon
 


Not sure if azoogle allow it, but you can track using "tid"'s (tracking string you append to the url). Have it contain something related to that ad-group, like a number for example. When someone clicks on your ad, you use the string and append it to the azoogle tracking string. You then match the two up in your reports (id automate it, but its easy enough by hand aswell).
 
I do the tracking string already. But with 300 adgroups, its very time consuming. I would like to know how to automate it.

So far, I download the azoogle data into Excel, print it out, then go through each adgroup and match it up to Adwords. Too slow. Takes ages across 3 search engines, each with 300 adgroups.

How can I automate it? Any suggestions using what application?
 
If you are looking for something to help you analyze your profitability in search you might want to check out and play with any network who runs direct track. DT launched a bid management tool that integrates in to the networks and provides stats by keyword and the ROI on each keyword. Its called direct track bid management or DTBM (shitty name) some networks might be able to get you a free account to test it out.

Networks who run DT are easy enough to find. Or ask people on this board.
 
If you want to test it out and are an affiliate of Copeac PM/IM me or email me. I can probably get you hooked up with a free trial to test it out and if you do enough volume ill pay for the system for you as long as you use Copeac.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.