Vote for Obama and get free shit!

[Tough Marketing]

Yes, either one of these guys could fuck us up but who is more likely too?

I am no fan of McCain but we know what he is all about. Worst case, things stay the same and we go through a pretty bad recession.

Obama has plans to change the very fabric of how we do business in America. His polices are really unknown and untested. CEOs around the nation agree that if he fucks up we could lose it all (No I will not cite it..Google it, if you want proof). We could go into a depression that could dwarf the first one.

I have to agree, either way I see huge problems.
The question is, who do we want to blame it on.

 

[popeye]

This is true when people are summarizing or editorializing on evidence/documents. But when the original sources are had, short a conspiracy or forgery(which are rare), no popeye, it's not an opinion.

For example, if someone has a copy of bill's check and tax form, we can conclude a few things(once again, so long as there's not a conspiracy)

1. Bill filled out a check for the IRS.
2. Bill completed a tax form.

How can we conclude this? Because they are facts. Not spin. Not bias. There is no 'interpretation' of the documents other than "Do they exist or not"

See? Primary sources. Important.

This may be true in some instances but the Interwebs must always be questioned. Photos, audio tapes and even birth certificates can easily altered by almost anyone.

Hawaii recently annouced that they have checked his brith certificate and it is valid. This is proof to me. Not some website that is owned by a partison Democrat.

 

[xmcp123]

This may be true in some instances but the Interwebs must always be questioned. Photos, audio tapes and even birth certificates can easily altered by almost anyone.

Hawaii recently annouced that they have checked his brith certificate and it is valid. This is proof to me. Not some website that is owned by a partison Democrat.

Factcheck actually has checked and disagreed with things Obama has said as well. But what I'm saying is when there is documentation looking you in the face, it seems a bit ridiculous to not accept it until there is more credible evidence contradicting it. This is not to say one shouldn't try and find evidence contradicting it, but is saying it's ridiculous to not at least assume it is correct until you find something to the contrary.
A gut feeling shouldn't be enough to defeat hard evidence in your mind.