Woman Follows Google Maps “Walking” Directions, Gets Hit, Sues

lol...



Woman Follows Google Maps “Walking” Directions, Gets Hit, Sues



Is Google responsible for giving out bad directions through its Google Maps service? We’re about to find out. After Googling walking directions for a trip in Park City, Utah, Lauren Rosenberg claims she was led onto a busy highway, where she was struck by a vehicle. She’s now suing Google for damages.


The case, Rosenberg v. Harwood, was filed in Utah, in the US District Court’s Central Division (Gary Price of ResourceShelf tipped us to it today). Harwood is Patrick Harwood, the person who actually hit Rosenberg, according to the suit. Both Harwood and Google are being sued in the same case, for damages “in excess of $100,000.”


Rosenberg used Google Maps on January 19, 2009, via her Blackberry, to get directions between 96 Daly Street, Park City, Utah and 1710 Prospector Avenue, Park City, Utah. Google provided these, telling her as part of the route to walk for about 1/2 mile along the calm-sounding “Deer Valley Drive.”


That’s an alternative name for that section of Utah State Route 224, a highway that lacks sidewalks, the case says. Rosenberg wasn’t warned about this, putting Google directly at fault in the accident, the case claims:
Defendant Google, through its “Google Maps” service provided Plaintiff Lauren Rosenberg with walking directions that led her out onto Deer valley Drive, a.k.a. State Route 224, a rural highway wit no sidewalks, and a roadway that exhibits motor vehicles traveling at high speeds, that is not reasonably safe for pedestrians.
The Defendant Google expects uses of the walking map site to rely on the accuracy of the walking directions given….
As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant Google’s careless, reckless, and negligent providing of unsafe directions, Plaintiff Laren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle…
 


So Google Maps held and her hand and led her onto Route 224? Dumb bitch.
 
1: Look up directions at google maps.
2: Jump in front of a car.
3: ????
4: Profit!
 
I'm pretty sure that even on mobile devices there's a disclaimer that pops up the first time you use google maps in regards to the accuracy of the information, and your own responsibility to check and shit like that.

Speaking of which in an old neighborhood of mine, google still gona show that a street exists, and it used to be the quickest way to my place at the time. Should I follow the example of this dumb bitch and just crash my car thru the gate of the RV center that bought up that section of land, just cuz thats how google map told me to get to that destination, or just take an extra 2 mins to go down to the next street? Likewise if a bridge is out, should I sue google if I decided to drive off the end of a bridge despite all the warnings, just cuz google map said it was open?