Corporate Welfare



so wtf are you saying is the root cause
The problem Jake is pointing out, is to distinguish between proximate and ultimate cause.

If I shoot you, the proximate cause of your demise was the bullet ripping through your flesh, but the ultimate cause was my pulling the trigger on the gun that fired it.

The proximate cause of GE being able to do what it does is lobbying. The ultimate cause is a system which is based on lobbying (democracy).
 
Except the underlying issue is greed, and that's not going anywhere.
Greed is good. It is imperative that everyone is greedy all of the time, or they would not be able to function in a rational manner.

Therefore you have to prevent this type of crony capitalism because it's counterproductive for our current economic system. Is there a way to do that without regulation?
The market. And the current economic system (a mixed economy / soft socialism) is not sustainable anyway. What is now, probably won't be later. Permanent systems and institutions are an invention in the minds of men, not the working of nature. Nature likes to break some things and evolve others. We're passengers on that trip.

Regulation is part of crony capitalism.
Thank you. Without a government/business partnership (aka regulation) there can be no crony capitalism.
 
there has, and will always be, a war between the rich and everyone else. that the battle is sold as "fairness of play" or some sort of market fetishism is nothing new. it's old an old and tired game. and when a middle class or lower class guy or girl somehow falls into that top 10% and finds him or herself part of that new class, perspective then, 9 times out of 10, changes, and the "new" rich go on the propaganda mission.
 
@EC, in market economies, class mobility is pretty active. Very few people are born in, and stay permanently in the lower class.

There are more rich today than ever before, per capita. The reason is the market economy, and the ability for everyone's relative standard of living to rise under capitalism.

Why else would the poor today have sneakers and cell phones, TVs and sunglasses? The western poor today live better than kings did 200 years ago.
 
Where did I say greed was bad?
You didn't, nor did I indicate you did.

Profit and loss. Strong property rights law.

Nope - just other forms of corruption.
I didn't understand this. You said nope, then you wrote about something unrelated.

Crony capitalism is when the government covers big business. Government can only have the power to help out big business if it can regulate, otherwise it has no authority or mandate to participate in industry.

Regulation is the most dangerous thing government does. It's pure power, for sale to the highest bidder. The only "good regulation" can come from the market, from the profit and loss system. That regulation allows competition. State regulation creates monopolies.
 
Profit and loss. Strong property rights law.

How does that prohibit market manipulation? It's simplistic to say any company can compete in a free market provided there is no government interference. First to market has an advantage and can run at a loss to prevent competition. Existing companies with large bankrolls can move into new markets and crush newer competition through price wars because businesses will always seek to limit competition. In theory, government regulation is supposed to limit that, but our legislators are bought and paid for so it never works as intended. However, with no regulations, monopolies would cripple our economy.


I didn't understand this. You said nope, then you wrote about something unrelated.

Crony capitalism is when the government covers big business. Government can only have the power to help out big business if it can regulate, otherwise it has no authority or mandate to participate in industry.

Because crony capitalism is just another form of corruption. It corrupts natural market forces, but without it other forms of corruption wouldn't cease to exist. The profit motive will ALWAYS lead to market manipulation and barriers to entry being raised. Any business seeks to create barriers to entry and it isn't always through regulation, particularly early on in a product life cycle.
 
A system of government that allows a majority to rule the minority.
More to the point, it's a system of government where individuals have exactly 1 vote to excersize their power with, while Corporations have Billions and billions of DOLLARS to excersize their power with.

...No wonder less than half of us bother to vote!

Lobbying is the Root of ALL EVIL in America... It's nothing less than a legal way to allow the few to BUY the votes that were meant for the many.

Next to this problem, I could care less who is in power, conservative, democrat, or Nazi, because the fact is they are totally limited to what they can get done with all this vote-buying going on!
 
The only "good regulation" can come from the market, from the profit and loss system. That regulation allows competition. State regulation creates monopolies.
This is the only thing on the whole page you've said that I disagree with.

You've seen Century of Self, I believe? Surely you can't believe that if left 100% unregulated, the Corporations of the world would simply balance themselves out perfectly and the end result would be a good one for us all?

And about full monopolies, do you believe they simply can't happen or last for very long under a truly free market, or that they aren't a problem?
 
The anarcho capitalists are still missing the root cause. It's not government in of itself, it's the ever lasting struggle for consolidation of power. Remove government, those with the most wealth are still going to find ways to consolidate power and create advantage outside of fairy tale pure market economic forces.

It's been happening ever since the dawn of aggressive agriculture and will continue as long as humans organize themselves in civilizations instead of in tribes. The problems started happening when the social framework we evolved to work in became untenable via advances in technology. We're too god damn smart for our own good, and now all we can do is figure out better ways to fuck over our fellow man. Which reminds me, I need to get back to work.
 
The anarcho capitalists are still missing the root cause. It's not government in of itself, it's the ever lasting struggle for consolidation of power. Remove government, those with the most wealth are still going to find ways to consolidate power and create advantage outside of fairy tale pure market economic forces.

padrino.jpg
 
I'm up 130+% plus my 2.90% dividend on GE purchased in March of 2009. Let those fuckers bank, it pads my pocket too.
 
It's not only about politics and corruption.
Some players can simply bend the game.
Smartest guys do the same in a perfectly legit way, stealing $60 billions from your pockets:

28auvj5.jpg
 
GE needs the money to buy all those Chevy Volts from Government Motors and other nonsense.

"Recently, President Obama selected General Electric ( GE - news - people ) CEO Jeffrey Immelt to chair his Economic Advisory Board. GE is awash in windmills waiting to be subsidized so they can provide unreliable, expensive power.

Consequently, and soon after his appointment, Immelt announced that GE will buy 50,000 Volts in the next two years, or half the total produced. Assuming the corporation qualifies for the same tax credit, we (you and me) just shelled out $375,000,000 to a company to buy cars that no one else wants so that GM will not tank and produce even more cars that no one wants. And this guy is the chair of Obama's Economic Advisory Board?"

Chevy Volt: The Car From Atlas Shrugged Motors - Forbes.com

This could have come directly out of "Atlas Shrugged".

If you have never read this book, read it and be prepared to be scared shitless. The crony capitalism and attacks on the true producers by those who want things done for the good of society is the path we are on.