Link Explosion SUPER-NET: Diversified, Simplified, Rankified - POWERFUL RESULTS

Status
Not open for further replies.


For exemple, one article uses the term "prostitution" "sex worker" what is this ??

I accepted to pay but now, you can dream now.

I am here sinds onl one month, I paid for 14 service, I have 100% itrade.

I asked a mod to delete your post were your past urls.

You know nothing about seo !

Right, I know nothing about SEO but yet I make my living online with websites and affiliate marketing. Wow, I must be a moron that knows nothing on how to rank my sites...

Maybe prostitution was mentioned because you want articles on travel from a place that has an entire population of prostitutes, have you ever thought of that? Do you understand English? Do you realize because the word PROSTITUTION shows up on your article you aren't going to get blackballed by Google...

You apparently don't know how SEO works... do you think your article is a "bad neighborhood" because of the word prostitution shows up once? Google is going to penalize you because you said that word? Don't be a retard.
 
I was considering trying this service but the way you handle unsatisfied clients (regardless of who is "right") leaves a lot to be desired

I'm sure it does, but its pretty annoying when someone trashes the service completely with lies and then doesn't pay for 4 hours of my work. The first reviewer said it was great, this other guy has an agenda and it has ruined my thread.

And I specifically told him, as I told the other reviewer, if you have ANY issues, let me know and I will correct the problem. But like I said, he wants to trash my thread for some reason, so he didn't contact me, he just trashed me.
 
Regardless of what he did you can handle it in a more professional manner. you could have easily approached it in a more constructive manner and helped him through the issues, whether he's lying or not, that would have shown all to-be customers that you're willing to satisfy their needs no matter what the cost.

Dont forget, now every potential client is going to come in this thread and see you outed a clients (whether he's aid or not) site and keyword as well as you trashing him and all french people.

There's a certain amount of respect every member deserves which you should afford him regardless of the situation.

He did exactly what he should have done, he posted his honest review. Whether you like it or not he's writing about the service he received.

If he had contacted you ahead of time it wouldn't have been 100% honest to all perspective clients.

The fact that you've sworn repeatedly and insulted his country is totally unprofessional and in my mind should warrant a ban for you and the deletion of your service permanently.

Just my .02

D
 
Regardless of what he did you can handle it in a more professional manner. you could have easily approached it in a more constructive manner and helped him through the issues, whether he's lying or not, that would have shown all to-be customers that you're willing to satisfy their needs no matter what the cost.

Dont forget, now every potential client is going to come in this thread and see you outed a clients (whether he's aid or not) site and keyword as well as you trashing him and all french people.

There's a certain amount of respect every member deserves which you should afford him regardless of the situation.

He did exactly what he should have done, he posted his honest review. Whether you like it or not he's writing about the service he received.

If he had contacted you ahead of time it wouldn't have been 100% honest to all perspective clients.

The fact that you've sworn repeatedly and insulted his country is totally unprofessional and in my mind should warrant a ban for you and the deletion of your service permanently.

Just my .02

D

No he didn't do what he should have done, he doesn't even fully understand English. He should have contacted me with the issue beforehand and let me know what the problem was, as I told him to do.

He posted his "honest review"? What because he said it was honest? How the fuck do you know if it was honest? I know it wasn't, because I am the one that provided the service, you don't know shit, you are just in this thread for no reason at all trying to make it your business.

Your .02 can suck my dick.
 
Regardless of what he did you can handle it in a more professional manner. you could have easily approached it in a more constructive manner and helped him through the issues, whether he's lying or not, that would have shown all to-be customers that you're willing to satisfy their needs no matter what the cost.

Dont forget, now every potential client is going to come in this thread and see you outed a clients (whether he's aid or not) site and keyword as well as you trashing him and all french people.

There's a certain amount of respect every member deserves which you should afford him regardless of the situation.

He did exactly what he should have done, he posted his honest review. Whether you like it or not he's writing about the service he received.

If he had contacted you ahead of time it wouldn't have been 100% honest to all perspective clients.

The fact that you've sworn repeatedly and insulted his country is totally unprofessional and in my mind should warrant a ban for you and the deletion of your service permanently.

Just my .02

D

^^^ THIS ^^^
You did a good job with my project, but now you're handling yourself like a little kid.
 
Review package completed and delivered to SeoHug yesterday, so a review should be submitted shortly.

Thanks

This whole Wickedfire experience is going to shit. My other reviewer, SeoHug, will not respond now after I delivered the package over 12 hours ago. He has been online and offline since then and has not responded to my emails or my private messages.
 
Review

I would like to thank Lizardtime for letting me have a review of this service at 75% discount price. Payment sent Transaction ID #5F7547****63745E.

I will go through the tab of the report and the checking I've done to try to explain things better.

# Accounts created
The first tab in the xls had username and password of all accounts created. So you can go back in and make any changes or updates to keep the bots interested.

# Web 2.0 Profiles: 35 out 39
Nice selection of sites that allow visible profiles. Each profile have a small blurb text, but it's the same in all profiles.
Domain PR of Web 2.0 domains:
1x PR8
3x PR7
16x PR6
10x PR5
3x PR4
3x PR3
1x PR2
1x PR0
1x N/A

# 20 Spun Article Submissions
Only 4 articles from 3 article directories were in the report. The others are pending moderation. No link or method supplied to check if they got published or not. A unique tag to search for them could have been used here.
There are some coding issues causing html tags to show up in the article such as <strong>widget widget</strong> in between paragraphs.
Articles are not readable, but it's not issue for me, expect they will have a hard time passing moderation - 30 of them pending.
Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of within.

# Social URLs: 12 found out of 35 (Ouch!)
Wordpress.com, Gather, webpaint...etc

# Web 2.0 Properties - direct link to money site:
12 out of 19 found
The others got deleted.
Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of within.

# Web 2.0 Properties - direct link to web 2.0 profiles:
Did not check all of them, but the few I did were there.

# Comments and forum profiles
I run a quick manual check on them and many were not there. I didn't check the moderated comments tab as they may take time to show up. Not problem for me, as I've got ammo to drip feed them later.

Pros:
- Excellent communication and constant updates until report is delivered
- Good selection of Web 2.0 profiles from high PR sites
- Accounts with username and password provided if you want to go in
- Nice diversified links, although not sure it will do the trick.

Cons:
- Web 2.0 profiles bio is identical, which will void their juice
- Number of submitted article 4 instead of the promised 20. Follow up when the others get published will help.
- Many social URLs got deleted and I feel the rest will follow.
- Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of contextual.

SERP changes:
Still too early, but will watch it in the next few weeks and report back of any movements here.

Overall:
In my opinion, the provider should increase the LIVE comments and profiles many, many times to back the props and make this worth the money. Some care should be applied to social URLs and web properties to make them stick as the number of deleted ones is quite high, even with the provider over delivering.
The best part of this package is the Web 2.0 profiles and the web 2.0 properties linking to them, but mesures should be taken on other aspects to make this worth the asking price.
 
I would like to thank Lizardtime for letting me have a review of this service at 75% discount price. Payment sent Transaction ID #5F7547****63745E.

I will go through the tab of the report and the checking I've done to try to explain things better.

# Accounts created
The first tab in the xls had username and password of all accounts created. So you can go back in and make any changes or updates to keep the bots interested.

# Web 2.0 Profiles: 35 out 39
Nice selection of sites that allow visible profiles. Each profile have a small blurb text, but it's the same in all profiles.
Domain PR of Web 2.0 domains:
1x PR8
3x PR7
16x PR6
10x PR5
3x PR4
3x PR3
1x PR2
1x PR0
1x N/A

# 20 Spun Article Submissions
Only 4 articles from 3 article directories were in the report. The others are pending moderation. No link or method supplied to check if they got published or not. A unique tag to search for them could have been used here.
There are some coding issues causing html tags to show up in the article such as <strong>widget widget</strong> in between paragraphs.
Articles are not readable, but it's not issue for me, expect they will have a hard time passing moderation - 30 of them pending.
Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of within.

# Social URLs: 12 found out of 35 (Ouch!)
Wordpress.com, Gather, webpaint...etc

# Web 2.0 Properties - direct link to money site:
12 out of 19 found
The others got deleted.
Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of within.

# Web 2.0 Properties - direct link to web 2.0 profiles:
Did not check all of them, but the few I did were there.

# Comments and forum profiles
I run a quick manual check on them and many were not there. I didn't check the moderated comments tab as they may take time to show up. Not problem for me, as I've got ammo to drip feed them later.

Pros:
- Excellent communication and constant updates until report is delivered
- Good selection of Web 2.0 profiles from high PR sites
- Accounts with username and password provided if you want to go in
- Nice diversified links, although not sure it will do the trick.

Cons:
- Web 2.0 profiles bio is identical, which will void their juice
- Number of submitted article 4 instead of the promised 20. Follow up when the others get published will help.
- Many social URLs got deleted and I feel the rest will follow.
- Anchored keyword at the bottom of article, instead of contextual.

SERP changes:
Still too early, but will watch it in the next few weeks and report back of any movements here.

Overall:
In my opinion, the provider should increase the LIVE comments and profiles many, many times to back the props and make this worth the money. Some care should be applied to social URLs and web properties to make them stick as the number of deleted ones is quite high, even with the provider over delivering.
The best part of this package is the Web 2.0 profiles and the web 2.0 properties linking to them, but mesures should be taken on other aspects to make this worth the asking price.

Thanks for the review.

I have had luck with social sites staying up, about 20 should have stayed.
I will check your urls in 3 days and replace any that have been removed with better ones that should stick.
 
If your work with lizardtime, take care.
See what he just sends me :)

I think it is the best review of is professionalism

lizardtime said:
I decided to do a test. I am going to check the rank of your keywords, then I am going to use scrapebox and scrape about 100,000 porn blogs, and then blast your url to them.

This test will tell us if "bad neighborhoods" really exist and what the penalty by google is.

Since you wasted 4 hours of my time, its the least I can do. I'll start tonight.
 
If your work with lizardtime, take care.
See what he just sends me :)

I think it is the best review of is professionalism

Please report back and let us know the effect. It should be interesting... wonder if I could sell the results in an ebook to make up for the money / time you wasted of mine.

You want to talk professionalism? I told you before your supposed review was ever created to let me know if you had any issues... you didn't, you just blasted away not caring to have any supposed issues corrected, then I messaged you and asked what I could do to help with it and you never respond. You just wanted to get off without paying a dime and could care less...

Well, I guess I am not professional, but neither are you, so who gives a shit at this point.
 
the next pm :smokin:
I'll follow along with the results and keep you posted, but I am sure you will know the results as we go.

This was a great idea, lets hope it works and you tank for all keywords off of googles charts.

But of course, I know nothing about SEO right? So it shouldn't matter... thats what you said at least.

Professionalism?? How about you pay for the work you ordered?
 
If your work with lizardtime, take care.
See what he just sends me :)

I think it is the best review of is professionalism

I offered discounted reviews so 1) I could have some reviews and feedback to keep the thread alive and 2) so I can make tweaks and changes to make the service better for customers. But you come in and act like it was the worst piece of shit you had ever seen and totally fucked the thread/service. So I will get banned, my service will get fucked, and your website will get fucked (maybe?? but I "don't know anything about SEO", so maybe not??)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.