I would like to talk about baby penis

Circumcision is genital mutilation, period.

Parents do not have the right to remove parts of their infants' bodies, period.

Hell, if I still had a foreskin, it would probably be so sensitive I'd cum before I even got my pants off.

Actually, you'd feel 50% to 100% more pleasure, without needing to be close to orgasm to feel it, and it wouldn't make you any more likely to fire off prematurely.

Premature ejaculation is much more common in mutilated men because they need to get close to orgasm to feel much whereas an unmutilated guy can get plenty of pleasurable sensations when they are nowhere close to orgasm.
 


In the UK it's unusual for guy's to be circumcised (apart from religious/health reasons).

I did get the chop (I had bendy boners, so health reason) and I'd have no problem with my son having it done... why? Cos when I got my first BJ the girl doing it thought it was Christmas - I think she enjoyed it as much as I did!

Word quickly got around too :pimp:

Seriously. Well worth the few weeks of misery as a child.
 
Here are the facts..







Sounds like good reasons to have them circumsized.

That is true only when the boy child does not keep himself clean. I'm not circumsized and was taught by my father the proper way to keep my tool clean.

Also males that are not cut experience more feeling in that area. :)
 
Other than the off chance that they fuck it up, what are the reasons to keep it?

The main thing I have seen is retarded men crying that they do not feel like a real man because a tiny piece of skin was taken from them. Doing anything to get it back (their man hood) when we all know their problem is not foreskin its being a wiped pussy.

Circumcised penis, look better, are more socially accepted, look longer(lol), are easier to clean, and may make you more disease resistant. Just wait to see how pissed you teenager gets because girls wont suck his dick because it looks weird. Because girls are not shallow at all...

I have NEVER had that problem. And yes I'm probably older than your parents. (58)
 
That is true only when the boy child does not keep himself clean. I'm not circumsized and was taught by my father the proper way to keep my tool clean.

Also males that are not cut experience more feeling in that area. :)


dog_penis.jpg
 
Other than the off chance that they fuck it up, what are the reasons to keep it?

The main thing I have seen is retarded men crying that they do not feel like a real man because a tiny piece of skin was taken from them. Doing anything to get it back (their man hood) when we all know their problem is not foreskin its being a wiped pussy.

Circumcised penis, look better, are more socially accepted, look longer(lol), are easier to clean, and may make you more disease resistant. Just wait to see how pissed you teenager gets because girls wont suck his dick because it looks weird. Because girls are not shallow at all...

+1

Should a parent be able to decide for a baby what it's name will be? Or should a baby decide for itself when it's not a baby?
 

LOL this pic is used for any topic now I guess, I don't remember discussing this at length on wf...?

Anyways. Circumcision makes me extremely uncomfortable. (This being said after my two boys have had it) It's extremely cruel, bizarre and unnecessary. I left the first baby's choice up to the father (I figured he had a penis he should know, right?) but it never sat right with me. Then when the second one came along I thought it would be weird to have one cut and the other not.

But if I could do it again, I wouldn't.
 
Why get circumcised unless you have to? It's there for a reason...

Look up female circumcision sometime, it's arguably just as "hygienic" since women are prone to yeast infections. Except you don't hear us men bitching and moaning about how gross a pussy can smell, because we'll just tell the ladies to take a shower instead of cutting off their junk.
 
Circumcision is just not right but forcing it on a baby is even worse. Here's why.

Would you trust evolution / nature's decisions about how the penis should be like OR would you trust a bunch of human doctors? The decision is yours as long as it is about your penis BUT you should not force it on the baby just because doctors recommended so.
 
Circumcision is just not right but forcing it on a baby is even worse. Here's why.

Would you trust evolution / nature's decisions about how the penis should be like OR would you trust a bunch of human doctors? The decision is yours as long as it is about your penis BUT you should not force it on the baby just because doctors recommended so.

You're a fucking monster if you've had your son circumsized. 3.7 billion years of evolution has not produced a single bare tipped penis but your dumbass thinks your son should lose his foreskin. Kill yourself USA.

This is a retarded fucking argument. You think that evolution takes care of everything? Why do you think we still have appendixes?

I'm glad that my parents decided to have me circumcised early enough so that I wouldn't remember it. I think it's great, and believe me I have enough feeling in the tip of my dong as it is. Also, who cares if you're circumcising a baby? If it doesn't emotionally scar them or disfigure them long term (in fact the opposite- at least where I grew up, people would call you uncut cowboy if your dick wasnt chopped) then whats the big fucking deal? Sure it's hard to watch a baby being hurt, but it's for their own good. Man the fuck up.
 
Right. And I bet you let your kid decide what they want to eat from the moment they can point at food, right?

What an asinine opinion. Your JOB as a parent is to impose your biases on your children. It's called PARENTING.

You took the underlined part of the sentence out of context and created a straw man argument.

I disagree with irreversible body modification imposed on minors by parents, then suddenly I am taken down a slippery slope in which I advocate that CHILDREN CAN DO ANYTHING (since all parental authority is biased).

--

Not long ago I was completely ignorant about the issue. I came across a huge thread on the Richard Dawkins forum about circumcision, and from there I felt compelled to look into it deeper.

It became clear that circumcised males usually advocate circumcision. Intact males advocate genital integrity. Both sides are biased and come up with backwards justifications for their position.

Both sides had medical and scientific data to back their claims but I eventually found the intact side to be more convincing. Pro-circ arguments failed to recognize the foreskin as a functional part of male anatomy. Circumcision severs nerves, plus 15 square inches of erogenous tissue. Foreskin protects the inner glans like the eyelid protects the eyeball etc.

I’m not bringing this shit up as an attempt to prove I’m right. The hope is that parents will take the time to investigate the medical data in detail, instead of scratching the surface or being pushed around by doctors and nurses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdExhibitJason
my wife is an RN who has horror stories about uncircumcised guys.. "it's a field day for bacteria" i'll leave it at that.

28 years as an uncircumcised male. Never had an issue here. Neither has my son. Neither did my Dad. Neither have my cousins.

See, there's this stuff called soap. And some other stuff called water. When used together, they fight bacteria. It's pretty cool.
 
Have you heard of the face lotion? That shit is nasty, some mom cuts the tip of sons dick off and then goes back to buy it at the department store to get rid of some crows feet.

And if it is so beneficial to males why doesn't anyone do it to woman? If I wanted to do it to my daughter Im sure people would flip the fuck out.

I have no idea really which way is really better (nor do I pretend to), but if you gave me the scissors there is no god damn way.
 
lol at my timing.

I spent the day today in an ambulatory room at the hospital, my GF had to get a procedure done... so I'm sitting there in pretty big room, a good 40-50 people, and out of them a good 10-15 babies in tow, crying, screaming, yelling, good times...

... As if getting there after being up since midnight due to insomniaville from campaigning and listening to babies cry isn't bad enough, I casually see a doc call "baby taylor", the couple beside me put up their hands, the doc comes over and starts talking about the procedure the baby is about to get - yep you guessed it.

I start looking around again and note all babies being called are male names - lol - poor lil' buggers. The docs quotable lines "So today's his lil' big day, he's just dying to do this isn't he" as if to show a signal of humor mixed with a touch of "maybe let him decide someday?". So yeah, I was around a baby onion ring maker all day today.

I'm uncut too, 32 yo, growing up I was a lil' insecure as a kid with the ladies but now I wouldn't think of it - and the ladies tell me it's 'in' now anyway. Hygiene wise, you raise him to wash up properly he'll be just fine.
 
I love how the same people who are OK with a woman deciding whether or not to kill their baby, think that parents shouldn't be allowed to decide whether or not their child gets rid of their foreskin or not.

Both of my boys got the chop. Not because I gave a fuck one way or the other but because by losing the foreskin their wasn't a "down side". On the other hand, if they were running around with dog dicks, and decided to be lazy little fuckers when they got a bit older, they could get an infection. Plus, from what I've heard and been told, most ladies prefer sucking dick that they don't have to yank a couple inches of excess skin from to get a good lip lock on, and I wanted to make sure they got as much twat as possible when they got older.