While Paterno definitely does deserve some blame for this, I'm not convinced that this level of vitriol towards him is reasonable.
With the benefit of hindsight it's easy to say that he could have and should have done more but that's a difficult situation. I mean, molesting a child is serious stuff and innocent people have had their reputations and lives ruined over *accusations*.
Even if we assume that the assistant didn't tell him a sanitized version of the events, rushing straight to the police station with secondhand information is just not on in my opinion. The assistant on the other hand is a grown man who should have gone to the police because he's the one who had eyewitness testimony.
Paterno went to his supervisor which was the right thing to do at the time. I agree that after finding out that the department wasn't investigating, he should have followed it up and dug into it more. That being said, phrases like "cover up" are a bit unfair.
It honestly reads more to me like a man who misjudged the severity of the situation and made a mistake. Serves as a reminder of how easily a single decision can change the course of someone's life.
To me, Sandusky's the one who ought to be getting vilified here.
With the benefit of hindsight it's easy to say that he could have and should have done more but that's a difficult situation. I mean, molesting a child is serious stuff and innocent people have had their reputations and lives ruined over *accusations*.
Even if we assume that the assistant didn't tell him a sanitized version of the events, rushing straight to the police station with secondhand information is just not on in my opinion. The assistant on the other hand is a grown man who should have gone to the police because he's the one who had eyewitness testimony.
Paterno went to his supervisor which was the right thing to do at the time. I agree that after finding out that the department wasn't investigating, he should have followed it up and dug into it more. That being said, phrases like "cover up" are a bit unfair.
It honestly reads more to me like a man who misjudged the severity of the situation and made a mistake. Serves as a reminder of how easily a single decision can change the course of someone's life.
To me, Sandusky's the one who ought to be getting vilified here.