I like boobs more than the next guy, but I dislike that breast cancer gets 99% of the "cancer publicity". Do we really need hundreds of millions of dollars raised for a cancer that can be found and properly treated if women were getting screened at an early age?
My wife's sister died of a horrible blood cancer probably none of you have heard of. Multiple Myeloma. At the age of 45 none the less. The same year she lost her brother, 46 to colon cancer. The next year my aunt died of lung cancer, non-smoker, at the age of 60. Yeah, all cancer sucks, but the favoritism toward a few types of cancer gets old after a while.
The photos are very saddening, and I feel horrible for her husband. I'm sure he feels differently about breast cancer than I, but the fact is that women shouldn't be dying from it these days. I don't see it as the priority cancer that needs a cure at this point.
You really see this as publicity for breast cancer? I don't.
We're not talking about the government pumping X amount of money into a nationwide breast cancer awareness campaign here. We're talking about an average joe who documented his wife's battle with cancer through photography. It happened to be breast cancer this time, but it could have been any other type of cancer.
In fact none of the photos he took show breasts or a mammogram or anything like that. If you didn't read the title of the page you could have guessed any type of cancer. Amirite?
Watching this didn't make me think breast cancer was any worse than other type of cancer. It just made me want to increase my monthly donations to the Canadian Cancer Society.