I think the USA was exceptional in some ways in the 50s and 60s.
I grew-up in the Cold War era and spent three years in the army training to kill Russians. However, I think this was a great move by Putin. Irrespective of his motives (and they are geopolitical for sure) his statement might just put a break on Barry going gung-ho.
I was online with one of my friends in Damascus today and she said people are feeling a bit more positive now, but they are still petrified of American rockets falling on their heads.
I agree with this, and as I said, exceptionalism is part of the American brand. Even if it's a myth, myth-making is what branding is all about.
There are a few things that get in the way of a sane and sensible US foreign policy.
People like the tri-cornered hat types (Tea Partiers) and retards like right-wing squawker Sarah Palin wrap themselves in American exceptionalism. Any challenge to the brand encourages their contracted talking heads to spew on Fox News.
Then there's the useless US Congress, especially those representing red states. They will defend the brand to the death as "what America is about." Odds are the congress critters have their own patriotic squawkers at town meetings making loud noises about American pride and strong defense. It's also economic: military bases are important employment centers in many small towns.
Lastly, there's the multi-trillion-dollar defense industry. They don't like peace; they have a vested interest in the boom-boom. War = good. Peace = bad.
Not to be a cynic, I know it was a coincidence that Halliburton, Cheney's company, was the no-bid winner of military contracts serving Iraq and Afghanistan.
Boom-boom. Cheney = rich-rich.
Cheney, neocon of note, is probably gritting away at his dentures, enraged there will probably be no boom-boom in Syria. He's likely writing an editorial about it as we speak.