The Cultural Collapse Theory



I like the below conversation in the comments:

ActionJackson said:
Roosh sounds like he's getting perilously close to Jewish Question … I guess it doesn't really matter since he's already on the SPLC hit list!

Guest (Response) said:
It's where all intellectually honest men end up when they attain the maturity and wisdom to accept it. They are confronted with the inescapable evidence that jews, acting as a sort of informal international cabal, have been deliberately undermining their host populations for a very long time.

Where most armies are straightforward and declare their intentions with military strength, jews operate insidiously in the shadows, posing as allies while mercilessly wrecking the host from the inside. Because they never own up to their true intentions, they are a far more dangerous threat to western civilization.

How you react to this knowledge determines your character. Do you run and hide from the truth because it is so incredibly unpopular and socially unacceptable, or do you embrace the truth no matter the cost?

As I suspected, Jews are at the root of this issue.

1388824725465.jpg
 
Guy seems like a real scholar.

I publish a free email newsletter for over 30,000 subscribers that has tips on day game, night game, approaching, venue selection, conversation ideas, dating strategy, one-night stand strategy, and sealing the deal.
 
Wait, I don't get it.

Everyone's claiming this article is complete bullshit, but I haven't even seen 1 argument against anything he's said.

Anyone care to elaborate why you think he's so full of shit?
 
Anyone care to elaborate why you think he's so full of shit?

You do realize this is the internet, right? The majority of these {bleeding-heart liberals|racist pig conservatives} just rage against whatever opinions lie on the opposite side of theirs.

Logic and rational debate are generally not forthcoming.
 
Wait, I don't get it.

Everyone's claiming this article is complete bullshit, but I haven't even seen 1 argument against anything he's said.

Anyone care to elaborate why you think he's so full of shit?

I will as soon as the CliffsNotes come out
 
Wait, I don't get it.

Everyone's claiming this article is complete bullshit, but I haven't even seen 1 argument against anything he's said.

Anyone care to elaborate why you think he's so full of shit?

"Religion has been a powerful restraint for millennia in preventing humans from pursuing their base desires and narcissistic tendencies so that they satisfy a god.", Really??? Really??"
 
Wait, I don't get it.

Everyone's claiming this article is complete bullshit, but I haven't even seen 1 argument against anything he's said.

Anyone care to elaborate why you think he's so full of shit?

Whether he's full of shit or not, I cannot say. What I can say is that he seems to be a Neo-Luddite who uses metaphors like "treadmill of technological and scientific progress," which suggests that there is something stable about progress. He makes no account for the randomness of things. He sees a straight line from Eden to Armageddon and is essentially delivering a prelapserian fallacy, which for those who don't have Google means:


  1. characteristic of the time before the Fall of Man; innocent and unspoilt.
    "a prelapsarian Eden of astonishing plenitude"



Such an Eden never existed.

He also talks as if "culture" was ever a stable thing. This is simply not possible. For one thing, each culture is made up of sub-cultures and they are constantly shifting and evolving and mixing with other things. This will continue to do so, building up some social elements that will be stable for a time (Myspace) and then will eventually dissipate (Myspace) before eventually disappearing altogether (please, Myspace, why do I keep bumping into you!)

The whole idea of a "native population" should also be deeply criticized. There never was such a thing on the planet, not even when we were orangutangs - and humans evolved in the first place due to the impossibility of a native population.

No, this fellow should stick to teaching people how to pick up chicks. What kind of girl would want to listen to simplified nonsense about the world like this, I'll never know, but there's probably one or two around his campus.
 
Whether he's right or not(I have no idea), I do find it disturbing that many European countries are opening their borders up to the lowest skilled immigrants.
 
I can't believe there aren't more positive responses on this article. Look at point #2 for example. I see evidence of this all around me, especially on TV where women are being promoted as the ones with the brains and in charge of the family while the beta-male father no longer has control like he once did. Today's father is no Ward Cleaver. Nowadays, it's the mother who is in charge.

2. Elimination of traditional sex roles

Once religion no longer plays a role in people’s lives, the stage is set to fracture male-female bonding. It is collectively attacked by several ideologies stemming from the beliefs of Cultural Marxist theory, which serve to accomplish one common end: destruction of the family unit so that citizens are dependent on the state. They achieve this goal through the marginalization of men and their role in society under the banner of “equality.”[6] With feminism pushed to the forefront of this umbrella movement, the drive for equality ends up being a power grab by women.[7] This attack is performed on a range of fronts:

  • medicating boys from a young age with ADHD drugs to eradicate displays of masculinity[8]
  • shaming of men for having direct sexual interest in attractive and fertile women
  • criminalization of normal male behavior by redefining some instances of consensual sex as rape[9]
  • imprisonment of unemployed fathers for non-payment of child support, rendering them destitute and unable to be a part of their children’s lives[10]
  • taxation of men at higher rates for redistribution to women[11] [12]
  • promotion of single mother and homosexual lifestyles over that of the nuclear family[13] [14]
The end result is that men, confused about their identify and averse to state punishment from sexual harassment, “date rape,” and divorce proceedings, make a rational decision to wait on the sidelines.[15] Women, still not happy with the increased power given to them, continue their assault on men by instructing them to “man up” into what has become an unfair deal—marriage. The elevation of women above men is allowed by corporations, which adopt “girl power” marketing to expand their consumer base and increase profits.[16] [17] Governments also allow it because it increases their tax revenue. Because there is money to be made with women working and becoming consumers, there is no effort by the elite to halt this development.