Mad Max Fury Road



Having been raised on the original 2 (I try to forget that BT exists), I feel this movie is not really a "Mad Max" movie. It is more so a movie that takes place in Max's universe. In reality, Max is a supporting character. No more, No less.

-=Chipmunk=-
 
rusvik said:
What a disgusting bitch this VICE guy is. Would punch in face irl.

To those saying it's not that bad, yada yada, women can be in male spaces blabla, what's really going on is just you being lazy and wanting to not take on responsibility for society in any way, which isn't surprising considering the mix of anti-social personality type and libertarians here. Don't go around trying to pass it off as being above stuff like that, you are just too lazy to care.

To compare, what these Hollywood usual suspects are doing to male cinema is comparable to if chick flicks instead of a happy ending with her getting the elusive player, she actually ends up either alone with cats or with a fat slob beta. That's the same and trust me, women wouldn't like that either.

This is the early time of the reactionary pushback. We're approaching peak degneracy, feminism and chosen ones hegemony, but the pushback is coming and the fact can be seen in any mainstream comment section now. It's growing exponentially.

It will be a day of beauty when the corrupters are put to justice.
Click to expand...

How exactly is your internet rage making the world a better place?

If Furiosa was Furioso, Vice would be publishing articles about how Mad Max is misogynistic and all the women are portrayed as sex slave rape victims who need men to rescue them etc etc.

They would still be driving a shitload of pageviews, and you'd still be here raging about the feminist/homo agenda and how violently masculine you are IRL.

Its a complete non-issue that only came to your attention because polarizing outrage porn drives pageviews.

None of this shit matters.
 
magicink said:
How exactly is your internet rage making the world a better place?

If Furiosa was Furioso, Vice would be publishing articles about how Mad Max is misogynistic and all the women are portrayed as sex slave rape victims who need men to rescue them etc etc.

They would still be driving a shitload of pageviews, and you'd still be here raging about the feminist/homo agenda and how violently masculine you are IRL.

Its a complete non-issue that only came to your attention because polarizing outrage porn drives pageviews.

None of this shit matters.
Click to expand...

Rusvik is the same retard that on one hand talks about the dangers of communism while on the other hand gets offended when a TV show makes Putin look bad despite the fact that Putin himself is former KGB agent working for the CPSU and a post Soviet era dictator that's been holding on to power since the 90s.

Also this moron can't even lift weights right and fucked up his back for life as a result. He's on the shortlist for a Darwin award.
 
Capital said:
See the movie. You're acting fucking hysterical.

There's no evil feminist propaganda in this film. I've seen it twice and I couldn't detect any hidden social commentary you could apply to modern Western societies.

Just because they hired a feminist writer/consultant doesn't mean there's some sort of fucking conspiracy to brainwash the masses through Mad Max. The fact you'd reach for a conspiratorial explanation before a simpler, more plausible one speaks volumes about your biased, myopic worldview.
Click to expand...
^this.

just saw the movie. frankly i don't know why they even bothered hiring a feminist consultant for this movie. I mean, it was just a fun action flick. didn't notice any "evil conspiracy". Now if this were a serious docudrama based on a true story about women being exploited, I could see them hiring a feminist consultant. but for this simple-minded fun flick??
makes you wonder if this was just a clever PR shtick to get people talking, get more publicity/news write-ups by hiring this feminist...
 
sennin436 said:
^this.

just saw the movie. frankly i don't know why they even bothered hiring a feminist consultant for this movie. I mean, it was just a fun action flick. didn't notice any "evil conspiracy". Now if this were a serious docudrama based on a true story about women being exploited, I could see them hiring a feminist consultant. but for this simple-minded fun flick??
makes you wonder if this was just a clever PR shtick to get people talking, get more publicity/news write-ups by hiring this feminist...
Click to expand...

Yeah I saw this movie too and it was absolutely fucking epic. The stunts were some of the best I've ever seen. There was no evil feminist propaganda, unless you think that one powerful man owning several women for the purpose of breeding is somehow okay. Even the MRA conspiratards should realize that this is NOT OK.

The main theme of the movie was that a person shouldn't own another person. What is wrong with that? They pull it off in such an ass kicking way.

Hopefully the pre-judgmental morons on here boycotting the movie will actually check it out and realize what a bunch of idiots they were. Being a free person is pretty much a libertarian concept after all. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the theme of the movie, and there is non stop action from start to end.
 
potentialeight said:
Gender roles are determined by nature sweetheart, not me.
Click to expand...

It's not nearly as black and white as you make it out to be. This is ultimately your opinion, and there's growing evidence to the contrary.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines gender roles as "socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women."

Last I checked a social construct isn't determined by nature.

How does a transgender person fit into your narrow definitions?
 
bluechinagroup said:
The main theme of the movie was that a person shouldn't own another person. What is wrong with that?
Click to expand...
well, maybe one of the sub-themes perhaps?? ;)

I'm thinking what's the common theme/thread in most of these MadMax films.
1. Road Warrior (Mad Max 2) - story about a powerful/charismastic gang/cult leader Humungus (the muscle-bound guy in the hockey mask) who tries to control or goes on raid parties to control one of the scarce resources in a post-apocalytic world - gasoline.
2. Beyond Thunderdome (Mad Max 3) - story of powerful/charismatic cult leaders in their power struggle to control Bartertown. Aunty May (tina turner) vs the Master Blaster team (midget + big muscle-bound freak).
3. Mad Max Fury Road - story of a powerful/charismatic cult leader Immortan Joe who controls water in the middle of a dessert, etc, etc.

hmmm...
 
I'm biased, but I saw it yesterday and did not see anything that would make all this hype for gender wars (not that I saw it for that reason, but I like action movies). There was no mention of utopia at all. In fact the women needed mans help in order to do anything -- not that anyone would be able to do it alone. So stupid.

Good movie for anyone who wants to see it.
 
Just saw the movie the last night. Fucking amazing! Pure bliss.

The only nauseating scene is the very last one where they take proles with them. So stupid and political correct. Otherwise, the feminism there doesn't bother me. It's nice to watch powerful women.


.
 
homosexuality is a hiccup in the genetic code.. that is reinforced thru repetative behavoir and thoughts.
 
bluechinagroup said:
It's not nearly as black and white as you make it out to be. This is ultimately your opinion, and there's growing evidence to the contrary.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines gender roles as "socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women."

Last I checked a social construct isn't determined by nature.

How does a transgender person fit into your narrow definitions?
Click to expand...

Transgender is just a social construct. Gender roles are determined by nature. Where are all of the transgender lions? Why do lions have such rigid gender roles?
 
potentialeight said:
Gender roles are determined by nature.
Click to expand...

So you're just going to keep repeating this like a broken record despite the World Health Organization contradicting your statement?

So are you saying the WHO is wrong by saying gender roles are "socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women."?

This is just your opinion. Stop passing it off as fact.
 
potentialeight said:
Transgender is just a social construct. Gender roles are determined by nature.
Click to expand...

If you take out the politics - trying to claim something as complex as gender roles is "just biology", or "just a social construct" are both obviously false.

Gender roles (and human personality in general) is influenced by our biology, but human biology is wired to adapt heavily based on our environment - especially social factors.

Humans are more socially malleable than any other animal. So "nature" itself has predetermined that "nurture" is going to have a significant impact on our behavior and personalities.

A boy raised feral by wolves is still going to be human - but he's not going to behave the same as a boy raised by upper middle class yuppies.

We're basically meat computers...our software can't be abstracted from our hardware. Biology and environment both affect who you are.

potentialeight said:
Where are all of the transgender lions? Why do lions have such rigid gender roles?
Click to expand...

...because lions have different biology than humans? Lions can't perform surgery either, but that doesn't mean opposable thumbs are a social construct.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom