quit hating fags

3nyaw

New member
Feb 20, 2014
326
5
0
Just in case you faggethaters dont get it:

Its the first time in history that the gay are openly encouraged to not pretend to be straight, so just in case it is a genetic trait that could possibly be weeded out, they will do the job themselves on the grounds of not banging anything fertile.

embrace it, inbred hillbillies
 


Just in case you faggethaters dont get it:

Its the first time in history that the gay are openly encouraged to not pretend to be straight, so just in case it is a genetic trait that could possibly be weeded out, they will do the job themselves on the grounds of not banging anything fertile.

embrace it, inbred hillbillies

Do you understand how babies are made? You need a boy and a girl, you can't do it with 2 boys or 2 girls. Therefore - it's a recessive gene, and cannot be weeded out. There's always a 25% chance of it showing up. Because it's not like you can have 2 gays combine their sperms and eggs and make a strong-gay-DNA baby - or make sure the baby isn't gay before its birth. And I'm sure if people could fix babies pre-birth - they'd focus on something you suffer from - like Down syndrome. Not a genetic trait noone gives a shit about.
 
205960.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: JakeStratham
Do you understand how babies are made? You need a boy and a girl, you can't do it with 2 boys or 2 girls. Therefore - it's a recessive gene, and cannot be weeded out. There's always a 25% chance of it showing up. Because it's not like you can have 2 gays combine their sperms and eggs and make a strong-gay-DNA baby - or make sure the baby isn't gay before its birth. And I'm sure if people could fix babies pre-birth - they'd focus on something you suffer from - like Down syndrome. Not a genetic trait noone gives a shit about.

no, pleas etell me more about how babies are made. i used to think it involves a boy and a girl. now back to the op..
 
Who gives a flying fuck about people wanting to buttfuck each other in the ass?

who gives a flying fuck about your uber childish mysoginist angst?

which other things can you buttfuck? what do you think warrants the qualifier "in the ass"?
 
who gives a flying fuck about your uber childish mysoginist angst?

Potentialeight should just embrace his closeted homosexual desires. He clearly needs a dick in his mouth. After all he hates women and his worldview is all about the females being subservient to males.

When that idiot is called out for making an illogical statement, he goes herp derp I was only trolling and seeing if you guys would catch on. Yep sure buddy.

That moron should focus on what he does best: mindlessly grind out gambling articles while high on adderall.

Potentialeight: Get back to work you fucking loser.
 
which other things can you buttfuck? what do you think warrants the qualifier "in the ass"?

Hey you shouldn't question someone who calls themselves an expert gambling writer. Clearly he knows what he's doing when it involves any kind of writing.

Too bad this hustler won't amount to anything more than a dude cranking out articles everyday instead of building something more significant.
 
Hey you shouldn't question someone who calls themselves an expert gambling writer. Clearly he knows what he's doing when it involves any kind of writing.

Too bad this hustler won't amount to anything more than a dude cranking out articles everyday instead of building something more significant.

hes an expert poker writer as well i see? can he write me a detailed analysis of wa/wb situations in headsup hands with optimal ranges on flush boards?
 
hes an expert poker writer as well i see? can he write me a detailed analysis of wa/wb situations in headsup hands with optimal ranges on flush boards?

Assuming NLHE, except in weird situations where we've checked down the flop and turn after limps or a single raise pre-flop, or in situations of a monotone flush, a WA/WB when a flush completes typically implies that Hero was the aggressor on the flop and/or turn with a hand that was at or near the top of his flop range (typically sets or top two). The two main cases are whether Hero is in or out of position, but you can break down further cases based on how many bets are left. Let's narrow down one situation to cover instead of looking at them all for the sake of brevity. Assume no rake for the sake of simplicity.

Suppose we're out of position with a bet and a raise left behind with an SPR of something like 2.5, and we're going to have our first bet be two-thirds of the pot. Let's also assume that we have a fair idea of Villian's range so that we don't have to establish Villain's GTO range after four streets of play before we tackle the actual situation.

First we have to establish the structure of Hero's range. We'll start by noting that Hero's optimal bluffing frequency is 28.57 percent (conveniently exactly 2/7), a well-established value for a two-thirds pot-sized bet. Hero's bluff:value frequency should be 2:5 along these lines.

Note: Villain's optimal fold percentage is 40 percent along similar lines. We'll need this later.

When Villain shoves over, he needs Hero to fold 30.56 percent of the time for the bluff to be break even, so that's Hero's folding frequency after betting. So here's what Hero's range looks like so far with the strongest hands to the left (with slight variations possible based on issues of combinatorics thanks to hold'em being a cunt):

<--check/raise (value)--|--bet/call (value)--|--bet/fold (value)--|--check/call (inducing etc)--|--check/raise (bluff)--|--check/fold--|--bet/fold--|--check/raise (bluff)>

To sum up the ratios for the betting ranges, there's a 5:2 ratio here of the right-most bet/fold range to the sum of the left-most bet/call and bet/fold ranges. Additionally, the two bet/fold ranges will be 30.56 percent of the sum of the bet/call and both bet/fold ranges.

This is getting long enough as it is, but the next part is to establish the ratios that happen when Hero check/raises and check/folds along similar lines. It's lots of well-established but boring (for most people) math that I don't expect anyone to follow.

Once you have these ratios in place, you get to the crux of the WA/WB situation which is that our profitable value leading range is virtually non-existent (or very thin at best). While all of the frequencies found for Hero's ranges in the above are based on ratios, they all take their specific frequencies from maximizing the number of +EV value bets there are. Every other range is based on this frequency, like from the ratios we looked at above.

Along these lines, the hands available to Hero for a profitable value bet are minimal outside of barreled flush draws that hit. This means we're also bluffing a very small percentage of the time, and we'll be checking a lot more. All of the exact GTO percentages for the range fall out of some simple algebra that comes from knowing what percentage of Hero's range will be profitable to value bet.

TL;DR: Check/raise and check/call more OOP.
 
Back on the topic of the OP, I think it's completely possible that homosexual behavior would give members of our species an evolutionary advantage, especially considering how social we are. We see evidence for that in the present with how bisexual males tend to have a lot more female sexual partners than straight males. That tends to fly in the face with the idea that homosexual behavior having a genetic component would cause them to "breed themselves out" as people with a lack of understanding of biology tend to think.

there are more ways to buttfuck?

MvZJMZG.gif

I mean you could probably buttfuck someone in the pussy if you were into chopping people up.
 
Just in case you faggethaters dont get it:

Its the first time in history that the gay are openly encouraged to not pretend to be straight, so just in case it is a genetic trait that could possibly be weeded out, they will do the job themselves on the grounds of not banging anything fertile.

embrace it, inbred hillbillies

Is this your first time "coming out" on a public forum?
 
I read an article some time ago, actually (I don't recall the source, alas, but it was BBC, most probably). That article gave results of 16 huge sociological surveys, conducted for around 20 years. Males were interviewed in hospitals by attractive open gay doctors, so that they had perfect opportunities to reveal themselves if they wanted to. Each round of surveying involved interviewing around 20 000 males in the US and the UK.

Throughout 20 years, percentage nearly did not change. Nearly 2% of respondents were open gays and around 5% of respondents disclosed that they were gays but lacked confidense to admit it.

Thus said, article author suggested that percentage of gays nearly does not change, some cultures and countries are just more tolerant to them , so they can follow their desires without risk of dire consequences.

Europe, Australia and USA are tolerant in general, China even endorses gays, as gay couples don't have children and it helps solve overpopulation issues (70 millions of open gays in China); Russia removed being a gay from their criminal code not so long ago (in Soviet times gays were often put into jail for no other reason); in many African countries declaring you are a gay is equal to commiting suicide - you will be executed shortly. In Southeast Asia and South America situation depends on the regime and culture (you all know about Thailand situation)

I will not even mention multiple scientific researches, showing that nearly all mammal species have around 7% of gay males. Religion of Ancient Egypt and Aegeic Greece is also full of gay moments and stories.

Thus, conclusions:
1) being a gay is natural
2) It has always been that way, even in prehistoric or ancient times
3) percentage of gays REMAINS STABLE THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF TIME - nearly 7% males
4) It will remain that way in the future
5) Though overall quantity of gays does not change, increasing amount of open gay couples frustrates heterosexual men and becoming more tolerant is the only way for both parties to co-exist.
 
Homosexuality can lead to social complications though ...


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxFPVHJkDsQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxFPVHJkDsQ[/ame]