quit hating fags



So BlueChina and 3nyaw are either a) The same person or B) Fucking each other in the ass.

I vote to put you "people" in a complex somewhere in Siberia so you can't continue to fuck up society any longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vadym
huh uh im so angry omg what do i do..

[ ] not say anything stupid
[ ] rage a bit
[x] accuse two established members of being fake accounts
 
Personally, I don't hate homosexuals any more than I hate, say, the schizophrenic. My feelings would more accurately be described as a mixture of pity and concern.

Pity over their illness, which I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.

Concern over the dangers they bring to society: increased rates of pedophilia, drug abuse, and domestic abuse, and, of course, AIDS. Let's not forget that AIDS became an epidemic on the (bare)backs of homosexual men. Their unrestrained, irresponsible perversity is indirectly responsible for one of history's worst genocides.

There's also concern over the ramifications the normalization of their illness will have on society. I can foresee the rise of pedophile rings as young boys are adopted by male homosexual couples for the sole purpose of being sexually abused.

I also freely admit that I'm uncomfortable with having a known homosexual, 3nyaw, on this forum. Would it be possible to have it quarantined to its own section, so that it can't socialize with us normal, healthy, intelligent people? Or possibly even put down?
 
Jared Jammer said:
Personally, I don't hate homosexuals any more than I hate, say, the schizophrenic. My feelings would more accurately be described as a mixture of pity and concern.

Pity over their illness, which I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.

Concern over the dangers they bring to society: increased rates of pedophilia, drug abuse, and domestic abuse, and, of course, AIDS. Let's not forget that AIDS became an epidemic on the (bare)backs of homosexual men. Their unrestrained, irresponsible perversity is indirectly responsible for one of history's worst genocides.

There's also concern over the ramifications the normalization of their illness will have on society. I can foresee the rise of pedophile rings as young boys are adopted by male homosexual couples for the sole purpose of being sexually abused.

I also freely admit that I'm uncomfortable with having a known homosexual, 3nyaw, on this forum. Would it be possible to have it quarantined to its own section, so that it can't socialize with us normal, healthy, intelligent people? Or possibly even put down?
Click to expand...

Sarcasm level is strong in this. Dark side appeals to you, young padavan?
 
AngryFiver said:
So BlueChina and 3nyaw are either a) The same person or B) Fucking each other in the ass.

I vote to put you "people" in a complex somewhere in Siberia so you can't continue to fuck up society any longer.
Click to expand...

Wrong on both counts you bitter insecure closet case.

Do you still hate your clients btw? I remember you crying about that a few weeks ago and it earned you some red bricks.

Good luck with reselling fiverr services bro. Keep dat hustle going.
 
Jared Jammer said:
Personally, I don't hate homosexuals any more than I hate, say, the schizophrenic. My feelings would more accurately be described as a mixture of pity and concern.

Pity over their illness, which I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.

Concern over the dangers they bring to society: increased rates of pedophilia, drug abuse, and domestic abuse, and, of course, AIDS. Let's not forget that AIDS became an epidemic on the (bare)backs of homosexual men. Their unrestrained, irresponsible perversity is indirectly responsible for one of history's worst genocides.

There's also concern over the ramifications the normalization of their illness will have on society. I can foresee the rise of pedophile rings as young boys are adopted by male homosexual couples for the sole purpose of being sexually abused.

I also freely admit that I'm uncomfortable with having a known homosexual, 3nyaw, on this forum. Would it be possible to have it quarantined to its own section, so that it can't socialize with us normal, healthy, intelligent people? Or possibly even put down?
Click to expand...

Strong post from strong gay porn star username.

Want to meet up for some coffee and chrystal charging?
 
potentialeight said:
Assuming NLHE, except in weird situations where we've checked down the flop and turn after limps or a single raise pre-flop, or in situations of a monotone flush, a WA/WB when a flush completes typically implies that Hero was the aggressor on the flop and/or turn with a hand that was at or near the top of his flop range (typically sets or top two). The two main cases are whether Hero is in or out of position, but you can break down further cases based on how many bets are left. Let's narrow down one situation to cover instead of looking at them all for the sake of brevity. Assume no rake for the sake of simplicity.

Suppose we're out of position with a bet and a raise left behind with an SPR of something like 2.5, and we're going to have our first bet be two-thirds of the pot. Let's also assume that we have a fair idea of Villian's range so that we don't have to establish Villain's GTO range after four streets of play before we tackle the actual situation.

First we have to establish the structure of Hero's range. We'll start by noting that Hero's optimal bluffing frequency is 28.57 percent (conveniently exactly 2/7), a well-established value for a two-thirds pot-sized bet. Hero's bluff:value frequency should be 2:5 along these lines.

Note: Villain's optimal fold percentage is 40 percent along similar lines. We'll need this later.

When Villain shoves over, he needs Hero to fold 30.56 percent of the time for the bluff to be break even, so that's Hero's folding frequency after betting. So here's what Hero's range looks like so far with the strongest hands to the left (with slight variations possible based on issues of combinatorics thanks to hold'em being a cunt):

<--check/raise (value)--|--bet/call (value)--|--bet/fold (value)--|--check/call (inducing etc)--|--check/raise (bluff)--|--check/fold--|--bet/fold--|--check/raise (bluff)>

To sum up the ratios for the betting ranges, there's a 5:2 ratio here of the right-most bet/fold range to the sum of the left-most bet/call and bet/fold ranges. Additionally, the two bet/fold ranges will be 30.56 percent of the sum of the bet/call and both bet/fold ranges.

This is getting long enough as it is, but the next part is to establish the ratios that happen when Hero check/raises and check/folds along similar lines. It's lots of well-established but boring (for most people) math that I don't expect anyone to follow.

Once you have these ratios in place, you get to the crux of the WA/WB situation which is that our profitable value leading range is virtually non-existent (or very thin at best). While all of the frequencies found for Hero's ranges in the above are based on ratios, they all take their specific frequencies from maximizing the number of +EV value bets there are. Every other range is based on this frequency, like from the ratios we looked at above.

Along these lines, the hands available to Hero for a profitable value bet are minimal outside of barreled flush draws that hit. This means we're also bluffing a very small percentage of the time, and we'll be checking a lot more. All of the exact GTO percentages for the range fall out of some simple algebra that comes from knowing what percentage of Hero's range will be profitable to value bet.

TL;DR: Check/raise and check/call more OOP.
Click to expand...

You just did $34.68 worth of work for free son. You got out played.
 
Hey what's up you gay retards I see you wrote a whole lot of shit and I didn't read any of it aaahahahahahahahahha
 
Industrypariah said:
Always trying to save face I see.

Hint: It's not working.
Click to expand...

iGOtu86.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom