Unified Field Theory

Status
Not open for further replies.
SeoReborn

SeoReborn

New member
Mar 5, 2008
2,216
28
0
London UK
If you like hidden truth, you would like this one. Its a theory of EVERYTHING, the theory of the universe and how everything links together. From physics to religion. Have you to tell you, there is so much in this that its impossible to summarise. You need to watch it. Its EIGHT hours long, but try 30 mins of it, and you'll be hooked.

<embed id="VideoPlayback" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=6151699791256390335&hl=en&fs=true" style="width:400px;height:326px" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> </embed>

<embed id="VideoPlayback" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-1895475242307393956&hl=en&fs=true" style="width:400px;height:326px" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> </embed>
 
  • Like
Reactions: riddarhusetgal


Watching now thanks! I love physics :)

At first I thought this was about "the secret" pseudo-science bullshit
 
This is the shit! +rep for the post. I've been studying string theory and m theory for fun <geek alert>, lol
 
@SEOReborn - do you read any of Charles Haanel's work? I'm am an absolute believer in the fallacy of newtonian physics and when people wake up to the reality that everything is energy (including thought) and that everything is connected, the better off we can all be. More money, better sex, world peace, whatever you want. Anyway, I'm down with swapping books with any WF member who is interested in using both sides of the brain (if you know what I mean :P)
 
I skipped through this and it just sounds like pseudoscience at its best. Complete BS. Hollow earth theory? That's fucking more retarded than "intelligent design".
 
pat J said:
I skipped through this and it just sounds like pseudoscience at its best. Complete BS. Hollow earth theory? That's fucking more retarded than "intelligent design".
Click to expand...

Ah, right, this is the nut with the hollow earth theory, thought his name (Nassim Haramein) was familiar.
 
Dan Grossman said:
Haven't we known that everything is energy since E=MC^2?
Click to expand...

Um, Ask the average guy or girl at the super-market if the ground they are standing on is "solid" or not and you will get the answer ;)

Stated another way, perhaps we've known that (above) but the implications (even after 50+ years) hardly permeate people's consciousness - IMHO. Sort of like several hundred years ago when the scientific community stopped bickering about the world being round but the average person still thought you could "fall off the edge of earth" - and behaved as so....

The implication to me is that matter and energy are interconvertible and interchangeable and if matter can be changed into energy, energy must be capable of being changed into matter (the U Chicago experiments on black matter have been conclusive I think....)

Thought is energy thus the line between the physical and the non-physical doesn't really exist.
It's not really pseudo-science to me (as some would have us believe), but just fact.

If everything=all thing, i.e. [thing1......infinity(thing)]

and

thought is included in that subset of [thing1....infinity(thing)]

then thought must = energy
and
thought = energy (something that is interchangeable and interconvertable) but all is = MATTER!

hence
thought = energy at a very high vibration or rather thought = mass at a very vibration...

......NB: <geek alert="">, lol</geek>
 
I dunno, maybe that's why I'm in a master's program at university, I thought that implication was obvious. Of course thought is energy, it's just a bunch of electrons moving around between neuron cells in your brain. And of course energy can be turned into matter, how do you think the large hadron collider is supposed to find new types of particles from high energy impacts? Some of the energy from the billions of collisions will become particles, with mass.

The whole big bang theory is that everything started as energy, and only as things started cooling off did particles (having mass) start forming from that energy (in order... protons and neutrons before hydrogen and helium atoms, etc).
 
If thought is energy then it can have an effect on our physical environs. I don't think the "average" person would accept that as fact even though the theory of relativity purports this.
Anyone want to chime in?
The big bang "theory" (I call it a "theory" since many of the leading scientists don't agree) fails to explain how "energy" came to exist in the first place. Which is quite silly to me.

Actually, Perry Marshall (you know the guy who wrote one of the only Adwords ebooks that's probably worth something) has some kick ass theories on this (Patterns vs. Designs and the associated implications as these concepts relate to the big bang theory)
Intelligent Evolution Quick Guide

. If I can find the link I will post it. It's a great intersection between physics and metaphysics if you ask me. I like the scientific nature of it even though it gets a bit too religious at times....

But to get back to my point, no I don't think that most people go around thinking "damn, thought=energy which means that my thought can effect the matter around me..."
The PEAR center at Princeton produced some scientifically-tested data on this which was kick ass in my book.

Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (Princeton Engineering Anamolies Research Center)

good stuff. they have a video too you can watch parts of it on google....
This is absolutely scientific stuff run by the guy who was the head of the engineering department at princeton.

I am always into science that's considered too "out there". A while back I gave my brother a book for his college graduation called "Great Failures of the Highly Successful" and in it you read how almost every single great advancement in science was ridiculed.

Who was it that said,
All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self evident.

watch

YouTube - The PEAR Proposition - (t)

(P.E.A.R. video on thought affecting the unified field)

(hey how do you embed?)
 
See, you're taking it too far and now you're "out there" too. The fact that thoughts are energy doesn't mean your thoughts have an effect on anything outside your head.

You can explain the complexity of what exists in our universe without going to the intelligent design nuts.

Here's some reading for you:

  • At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
  • Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos
  • Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
  • Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
 
All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self evident.

Try stretching the neurons a little :P . An open mind literally means weighing the facts on their merit alone vs. our own pre-conceived notions. It's like trying to convince a Swede that all southerners aren't gun-carrying bigots who go to church everyday and spit tobacco.....or, like trying to convince a red State Palin aficianado just how many card carrying democratic socialists living in Stockholm live a life of material abundance and political freedom they would/could scarcely dream of - while paying 60% in taxes each year!
;)
 
PS
..think I'm going to check these out -

  • At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
  • Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos
 
Dan Grossman said:
See, you're taking it too far and now you're "out there" too. The fact that thoughts are energy doesn't mean your thoughts have an effect on anything outside your head.

You can explain the complexity of what exists in our universe without going to the intelligent design nuts.

Here's some reading for you:

  • At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
  • Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos
  • Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
  • Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Click to expand...

---
PS
Not to beat a dead horse but did you actually SEE any of the research done at PEAR before drawing this conclusion?

1) The research was funded by Dupont Corporation (ever heard of dousing? Maybe not but oil and gas companies pay "out there" consulting millions of dollars each year to do this - it's a matter of fact)

2) The research was conducted by the head of the Princeton Engineering Department - I don't have to tell you what a top tier program this is

3) Please keep in mind that most of what we "accept" as fact was very, very far out just 50 years ago. If thought is energy and you accept as fact that E=mc^2 please tell me how something that is energy (i.e. thought) can not effect the unified field....
 
James Clerk Maxwell proposed the first field theory, for electromagnetism, in the middle of the 1800s. Early in the 20th century, Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity - dealing with gravitation - became the second field theory. The term unified field theory was coined by Einstein, who was attempting to prove that electromagnetism and gravity were different manifestations of a single fundamental field. When quantum theory entered the picture, the puzzle became more complex. The theory of relativity explains the nature and behavior of all phenomena on the macroscopic level (things that are visible to the naked eye); quantum theory explains the nature and behavior of all phenomena on the microscopic (atomic and subatomic) level. Perplexingly, however, the two theories are incompatible. Unconvinced that nature would prescribe totally different modes of behavior for phenomena that were simply scaled differently, Einstein sought a theory that would reconcile the two apparently irreconcilable theories that form the basis of modern physics.
 
riddarhusetgal said:
@SEOReborn - do you read any of Charles Haanel's work? I'm am an absolute believer in the fallacy of newtonian physics and when people wake up to the reality that everything is energy (including thought) and that everything is connected, the better off we can all be. More money, better sex, world peace, whatever you want. Anyway, I'm down with swapping books with any WF member who is interested in using both sides of the brain (if you know what I mean :P)
Click to expand...

I'm have not read any of Charles Haanel's work.

The problem with physics is that it proposes a closed system while a close system does not exist in the real world. Also it does not take account of conciousness. I do believe there is much more than physical matter, and what we see and experience is less than 0.0000000000000000000000000000001% of "entire" reality. Have been trying to astral project with meditation and had some success but have put it one hold for the time being due to work load. Oh and yeah, I do believe our thoughts influence the world around us.

@those who think this is "out there bs". What we take for fact now was a theory before. Theories in physics is a model of reality and is the "best" model by which the majority agree upon. It is then taken as fact. Infact some theories that have been taken as fact have not sound scientific backing. They only became fact because they were not challenged over many years. To grow as a society and advance ourselves we need to challenge those theories and bring about newer better models. Like Nassim said in the video, if everyone just keep on restating the same theories, same models all the time, there would be no advancement at all would there?? Look how long it took people to even contemplate the idea that the earth revolved around the sun or that the earth isn't flat. They took their theories as fact, hence slowing down our understanding of the world.
 
riddarhusetgal said:
watch

YouTube - The PEAR Proposition - (t)

(P.E.A.R. video on thought affecting the unified field)

(hey how do you embed?)
Click to expand...


The Global Conciousness Project measures the movement or "ocean" of consciousness through changes in random number generators that are set up around the world. Eight years+ of data looking at 204 major world events has shown that a kind of "coherence" takes place associated with these incidents, in which the numbers become less random. The overall odds against chance of this occurring are roughly 300,000 to 1. Further, these types of results were mainly associated with populated areas, indicating that consciousness was the variable in the changes.

Dean Radin of the Institute of Noetic Sciences said "Our perceptions of reality are a construction-- we don't see the way the world actually is," and experiments have shown that slight changes to expectations cause people to see completely different things.

Global Consciousness Project -- consciousness, group consciousness, mind
 
Dan Grossman said:
See, you're taking it too far and now you're "out there" too. The fact that thoughts are energy doesn't mean your thoughts have an effect on anything outside your head.

You can explain the complexity of what exists in our universe without going to the intelligent design nuts.

Here's some reading for you:

  • At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
  • Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos
  • Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
  • Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Click to expand...

If thoughts don't have an effect on what goes on outside your head, why, in quantum interference experiments (like the double slit experiment), does an atom appear either in box A, or box B, or both, depending on what the conscious observer decides they want to prove?

I was deeply sceptical of all this stuff (I detest pseudoscience) - but two books have really changed my understanding. Quantum Psychology by Robert Anton Wilson and The Quantum Enigma by Bruce Rosenblum.

Semi-related, I've been reading a lot of Taoist stuff of late and the Chinese were really spot on with a lot of things. Which goes to show what you can achieve without the Internet or Television to distract you. :updown:
 
See this is what I am talkin' about - I'm have a neuroplasticity orgasm here....lol
I'm going to look up the books mentioned here and + them to the ole amazon.com wish list.

It takes alot of exposure (travel helps too) for the 'average' person to get out of the frame of mind where they'll consider looking into stuff that's "out there".

200 years ago, when Emanuel Swedenborg the Swedish scientist and mystic said "someday, man will fly - even to the moon", they thought he was "out there" at best and "crazy" at worst.

Einstein had a dream and told some colleagues who weren't diplomatic enough to call him "out there" they said he was crazy.

In the dream he was riding on a beam of light. Then friends said to him "let me get this straight, you want to trash 200+ years of Newtonian physics because you had a cockeyed story of yourself riding on a beam of light?!" (para-phrasing of course...)

The rest was/is history.

I could go on about some of Tesla's work but you guys probably already know about it....
Take care all - as above so below, as within, so without....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom