Yes a 0.58 CTR on Facebook.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aequitas

New member
Feb 19, 2007
2,954
73
0
Canada
Beat that shit....

018.png


hahaha ok ok so thats cheating a bit since its a new campaign but come on what are you guys doing these days for CTR?

You don't gotta post any details about the offer I just want to see who's got the best CTR (Just for fun)
 


10,240 impressions, 89 clicks, .87 CTR .48 max bid, .15 avg. cpc

Ohh your beating my ass I just got an increase on my CTR with this same one I posted above but now its at .77

0156.png


And yes for anyone asking I'm playing this game by being cheap since "10,240 impressions, 89 clicks, .87 CTR" obviously destroys my image, I'm still going to say were in a close run.
 
The highest I've got was a 0.15%.

But then again, I'm a FB noob and suck at writing adcopy anyway.

Let us know if it actually keeps up tho :)
 
The highest I've got was a 0.15%.

But then again, I'm a FB noob and suck at writing adcopy anyway.

Let us know if it actually keeps up tho :)

Do what I do and look for similar offers copy the headline, and re-write your ad text to support your own message.
 
Hey look at that on another split test for this same offer I just got....

CTR of 0.52 a cost of 0.15 - a single click and a conversion worth $2.55 cents.....

Thats like what a 1600% ROI

Facebook money making 1 oh 1.

Yes this is a useless thread kill me tomorrow cause its 5am here and I haven't slept in a month.
 
Beat that shit....

018.png


hahaha ok ok so thats cheating a bit since its a new campaign but come on what are you guys doing these days for CTR?

You don't gotta post any details about the offer I just want to see who's got the best CTR (Just for fun)

are you the guy doing that google money blog
 
Spoke too soon..Just hit a personal record :)

0.10 CPC 107,405 182 0.17
0.37
0.63
67.92

0.17% ctr targetting males 18-23 only..

Probably nothing to brag about. Probably shouldn't have set such a high CPC Bid in the first place. but wtvr. stfu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.