So your logic is that if these products are promoted via a flog(not splog ya dumbass) which says the offer works, that is the reason for the shaving? Why is it misleading to say the product works on a flog but somehow isn't misleading being all over the landing page of the offer...or are those testimonials and pitch words on the lp just for shits or what, not following you at all here bud.
Your definition of "quality traffic" is consumers who can be billed the longest without realizing it or do not take the initiative to cancel. Well I don't know of a longest potential billing filter to only get this so called quality, in fact I think it's totally outlandish to propose aquiring this type of lead can be controlled. The merchants are jerry-rigging the situation by shaving.
If the products actually worked and customers weren't billed immediately when it says trial, get into impossible to cancel billing cycles then it wouldn't matter how it was promoted as long as the people are interested in the least. How can netflix, columbia house, credit reports and other reputable companies run on incent? Because the customers that end up getting the product or service are mostly satisfied. It's not about the "quality" of the leads, it's the fact that most rebill products in the cpa market are total dogshit when it comes to actual value.
It's either make your own products or get raped from time to time and quickly implement a rotator. The shaving discussion always seems to turn out like an unpragmatic bitchfest ending up being completely ineffectual.
