Obama To Destroy American Nukes While Russians Prepare "Pre-emptive" Nuclear Doctrine

hellblazer

New member
Sep 20, 2008
3,019
86
0
Obama To Destroy American Nukes While Russians Prepare "Pre-emptive" Nuclear Doctrine

So Obama is going to allow Russian military personnel to inspect our nuclear facilities. He just can't wait to destroy our nukes and make a 'nuclear-free world'.

Thankfully, the Russians are onboard with this utopia and are dutifully disarming as well.

Ummm... actually they're not.

They just revised their military doctrine to allow 'pre-emptive nuclear strikes' on enemies, including NATO and/or America.

Nice. But don't worry, folks - I'm just a 'rightwing nutjob'.

--------------------------------------------------

Report: Russia to allow pre-emptive nukes
Oct 14 11:09 AM US/Eastern
By DAVID NOWAK
Associated Press Writer
Comments (18) Email to a friend Share on Facebook Tweet this

MOSCOW (AP) - A top Russian security official says Moscow reserves the right to conduct pre-emptive nuclear strikes to safeguard the country against aggression on both a large and a local scale, according to a newspaper interview published Wednesday.

Presidential Security Council chief Nikolai Patrushev also singled out the U.S. and NATO, saying Moscow's Cold War foes still pose potential threats to Russia despite what he called a global trend toward local conflicts.


The interview appeared in the daily Izvestia during a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, as U.S. and Russian negotiators try to hammer out a nuclear arms reduction treaty by December. It also came amid grumbling in Moscow over U.S. moves to modify plans for a missile shield near Russia's borders rather than ditch the idea outright.


Patrushev said a sweeping document on military policy including a passage on preventative nuclear force will be handed to President Dmitry Medvedev by the end of the year, according to Izvestia.


Officials are examining "a variety of possibilities for using nuclear force, depending on the situation and the intentions of the possible opponent," Patrushev was quoted as saying. "In situations critical to national security, options including a preventative nuclear strike on the aggressor are not excluded."


The proposed doctrine would allow for the use of nuclear weapons "to repel

an aggression with the use of conventional weapons not only in a large-scale but also in a regional and even local war," Patrushev was quoted as saying. He said a government analysis of the threat of conflict in the world showed "a shift from large-scale conflicts to local wars and armed conflicts."


"However, earlier military dangers and threats for our country have not lost significance," he was quoted as saying. "Activity on receiving new members into NATO is not ceasing. The military activity of the bloc is being stepped up. U.S. strategic forces are conducting intensive training on using strategic nuclear weapons."


Russian military analysts said the hawkish former domestic intelligence chief's remarks were mostly muscle-flexing for show, because what he revealed about the proposed new doctrine suggests it differs little from the current one.


One independent analyst, Alexander Golts, said current policy already allows for a nuclear strike to repel an aggression of any sort. Another, Pavel Felgenhauer, said that effectively allows for a pre-emptive strike because the type of aggression that would warrant such a strike is not clearly defined.


Russia' NATO envoy, Dmitry Rogozin, argued the proposed doctrine does not contradict arms reduction efforts. "We are moving toward a reduction in nuclear arsenals," he told Ekho Moskvy radio.
Still, Patrushev's focus on local conflicts could rattle Georgia, the small neighbor that Russia routed in a five-day conventional war with Russia last year.


Analysts also said his description of the proposed policy shows Russia's growing reliance on nuclear arms as its conventional arsenal decays and unpopular military reforms stall. Observers say the war with Georgia exposed frailties in Russia's military, adding urgency to planned reforms.


In a symptomatic setback, a scheduled test launch of the new Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile—which has failed in seven of its 11 test launches so far—was postponed, the state-run RIA Novosti news agency reported. The Bulava has been billed as the future of Russia's nuclear arsenal.
 


Any "Super Powers" Left in the world is definitely not going to disarm, because there's always that paranoid 'what if' cabinet member. Seriously though, if any of our enemies even based out of sorta-3rd-world regions are capable of building a nuke even if they have problems delivering it right now, do you really think we're truly going to give up that ability ourselves?
 
The proposed doctrine would allow for the use of nuclear weapons "to repel

Sitting 5 ft from the screen this looked like "The proposed doctrine would allow for the use of nuclear weapons to rape!"

My bunghole clenched for a second there.
 
Do you really think the US military will show anyone ALL of the nukes? They might show a few review copies or take them to the cafe bar in area 51. Show them all? Nooka plz.
 
Basically you don't need 1,000's of nukes like we have. 10 will do the job if it comes down to it which would pretty much pepper the world with nuclear radiation. In other news I heard Obama is an alien, can anyone vouch that he isn't be showing documented proof? Thanks bro.

Peter Schiff for Senate 2010|Home
 
Russian military analysts said the hawkish former domestic intelligence chief's remarks were mostly muscle-flexing for show, because what he revealed about the proposed new doctrine suggests it differs little from the current one.

So in summation this isn't really news.
 
Most nations signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968. Those without nukes agreed not to make them, while those that had them agreed to work towards getting rid of them. That was 41 years ago and the nuclear powers still remain that way.

It's in these countries interest to at least give out the impression that they are working to uphold their part of the treaty by trying to reduce them. This makes it harder for the nations without nukes to try and justify why they should have them.

Obama has said he knows that they won't be eliminated in his lifetime. Ronald Reagan said it was his dream to rid the world of them.

McCain also wants to destroy American nukes.

McCain offers plan to reduce nuclear weapons - John McCain News- msnbc.com
 
So how many times can we blow up the planet now?

Sigh...you guys are so dumb.

3790865581_8dc23e7c64_o.jpg