1.6TB / second internet?
- Thread starter Kiopa_Matt
- Start date
:laughing-smiley-007 Needless to say, it does not take much time to be lured to bad things. I have seen many decent ones surrendering to the temptation.
It's 1600% faster than Google's shitty fiber service. Coming to a home near you!
In 10 - 15 years.
I have 40mbps and it's overkill as it is. My problem isn't speed, it's bandwidth allocations. Especially a couple years ago when Comcast would literally disconnect your internet if you went over 250GB. As part of their rebranding to xfinity, last year they changed it to where they just charge extra $ per 50GB you go over, but we use 500GB+ easily (it's amazing how much b/w Netflix uses).
I just typed up this huge reply about why all of you guys are wrong, and then my dial-up dropped connection 
Consider yourselves lucky.
Consider yourselves lucky.
No. Jeffrey and Dwight alone produce more than 1.6 terabits of gay porn per second, and that's not even counting their weekly threesomes with I2E.
Fuck Prism's, I've got peoples working on Kaleidoscopes within Kaleidoscopes to dodge them Prism's!!!
Lulz
I'm just snipping your post, Fatbat, to make a point. You covered quite a few other issues with your post.
I actually foresee developing nations having these speeds before developed nations. Look at how most 3rd-world countries went straight from needing satellite phones to place calls to using cellphones. They didn't really even bother with landlines.
The problem we have is that we are already developed. "We" complain about download caps and annoying company policies which keep innovations at a minimum because it is just "cheaper" to try and get a few more bits per second out of what is already there while the company just raises prices. These are first-world problems.
First-world nations have too much infrastructure to get fiber-optic lines everywhere, not to mention the telecoms preventing access to new carriers so they are pseudomonopolies. Third-world nations are where it's going to be in bulk. For one, it's going to be easier for installing it the first time. Then, once the lines are in place all they have to do is change out the crystal and laser on each end to improve the speeds. We can't do that in first-world because it'd require the companies to remove all the lines that are already there while laying the new.
Once third-world nations get all the good technologies and drive up new innovations to do with their newfound speed, then you'll end up seeing enough market pressure to get the first-world nation's infrastructure improved.
^^ You may very well be right, and I think we'd likely see these kinds of speeds in Scandinavian countries as well, since they've already strung fiber everywhere and have such low populations. I've got Swedish friends sporting 200-300mb fiber connections already.
