Let me clarify that for you.
"Your argument is invalid because youre stupid."
Is only ad hominem if the latter part is not true.
If its impossible for you to be right by way of you lacking the mental capacity to talk about the topic, then thats not a rhetoric device. Its just the reason. (Try occams razor cause its a fan favourite)
Assume you are just a point trying to talk about the universe. You are essentially a singularity. You can only experience points (and they all look the same locally because the concept of locality works that way for points). All the concepts that make the universe the universe you cant experience because you are a singularity.
Me saying "you cant know. youre just a point." is the correct argument, not some ad hominem bullshit like you guys want to convince yourself of.
The fact of something being an absolute truth obviously supercedes the concept of rhetoric device. By way of logic.
"Your argument is invalid because youre stupid."
Is only ad hominem if the latter part is not true.
If its impossible for you to be right by way of you lacking the mental capacity to talk about the topic, then thats not a rhetoric device. Its just the reason. (Try occams razor cause its a fan favourite)
Assume you are just a point trying to talk about the universe. You are essentially a singularity. You can only experience points (and they all look the same locally because the concept of locality works that way for points). All the concepts that make the universe the universe you cant experience because you are a singularity.
Me saying "you cant know. youre just a point." is the correct argument, not some ad hominem bullshit like you guys want to convince yourself of.
The fact of something being an absolute truth obviously supercedes the concept of rhetoric device. By way of logic.
