Alex Jones on Howard Stern

Alex Jones is a nut...

But the only thing worse than my occassionally listening to his show is that it seems about 6 months after him spouting some crazy rant, it ends up being true...

I would not bet my rent money on what he says is right 100% of the time, but it is scary how often he is right.
 


As someone who doesn't listen to AJ, can someone enlighten me as to what he reported on that was surprising when it turned out to be right?

Is here merely reporting facts or are his theories regarding those facts what turns out to be right?
 
As someone who doesn't listen to AJ, can someone enlighten me as to what he reported on that was surprising when it turned out to be right?

Is here merely reporting facts or are his theories regarding those facts what turns out to be right?

It's go back and look up Alex jones and black helicopters. Then go look up Miami military training from last month. Check into smart meters or the drone program. They all start off the same first the media says they don't exist and AJ is a conspiracy nut. Then when it becomes mainstream they admit they exist and move on. No matter what you views on AJ is, he has a proven track record
 
Worse? lol. No. He makes people QUESTION things and do their own RESEARCH... (How many times did he say Google this or read this? A ton) Which do you prefer? The entire world believing that 9/11 was entirely true as told by the media. Or now a good chunk of the world starting to question it and do more research, and desire the real answers. Let's get real, we all know building 7 was clearly a setup. I'd much rather people wake up and strive to bring about the truth, rather than be told a bunch of lies. Also Alex might not be accurate on everything, but let's be real about this.. When you're trying to uncover stuff people don't want you to know about, are you always going to be right 100% of the time? I mean, there's only so much limited info, you have to theorize and use judgement at some point. But you can't discredit the man, the majority of the things he talks about are true. Overall there's way, way more good being done than bad.

I've heard the attacks on him before with the whole making money off people issue. But without funding do you really think he'd be able to afford 50 staff members to help him promote the website, make videos, the talk show, etc? No. In return all those things help reach even more people and spread messages further and further. Not to mention the hours and hours of research that's being done. These types of things don't just pop up in your face, this isn't the TV where it's all being spoon fed.

I'm not an Alex Jones fan or anything, but after 9/11 I used to listen to him a lot as most of his fans would talk about how he was pointing out how it could be an inside job, etc. (it was funny to me)

People called him crazy. Then he said that we'd go to war with Iraq soon and that it was all a part of the ultimate plan. People thought he was a nut, because Iraq didn't have Muslim terrorists. I don't think ANYONE thought Iraq had anything to do with 9/11, so why would they be an issue? He seemed to know about the Weapons of Mass Destruction excuse far before the media ever mentioned "WMD's" ...like months before anyone mentioned them.

It was over a year later, but we ended up going to war with Iraq and the mainstream media pushed a "terrorist" agenda on that war every time they reported anything about it.

The dude says a lot of crazy shit, but if you listen to the mainstream media and Alex Jones, you're going to get a lot more truth out of Alex Jones when it comes to world events. Unfortunately, that's just a fact.
 
Alex Jones thinks 911 was an inside job orchestrated by our goverment. Cool, I challenge you to find me some hard evidence that we can all agree on.

Tin_foil_hat_3.png

dmnEPC challenged you to 3 instances. Lets say you're trying to put 911 as one instance. What about the other 2? Remember this is what you said:

Alex Jones makes up stories, twists facts, ...

Also remember that you say it is stories that he made up. So these stories have to originate from him. So now ask yourself whether 911 fit the bill.
 
dmnEPC challenged you to 3 instances. Lets say you're trying to put 911 as one instance. What about the other 2? Remember this is what you said:



Also remember that you say it is stories that he made up. So these stories have to originate from him. So now ask yourself whether 911 fit the bill.

good post. Sweepicker just got owned.

headinchaircj1.jpg
 
As someone who doesn't listen to AJ, can someone enlighten me as to what he reported on that was surprising when it turned out to be right?

Is here merely reporting facts or are his theories regarding those facts what turns out to be right?


Most of the stuff he pulls is in the public domain, either declassified, from FOIA requests, or just stuff that has always been out there, but not reported.

The part that gets on people's nerves is when he does stuff like take a U.S. Army document on internment procedures, then go apeshit about how we're all going into FEMA camps.

But with the military, and govt. in general, there's a lot of money spent planning for any possible scenario that could happen- not necessarily what they are planning to do, but how to react, should such a scenario ever arise. They pay people to think of the wildest shit they can think of, then draw up a plan on how to react.

He talked about it in that interview; basically admits he does theatrics because he wants people to be aware of it. Some people do buy into the fear though.

I think the next thing starting to creep into the mainstream (that he's talked about for some time) has to do with what happened in Libya and Syria, and how the "rebels" that the U.S. is helping out were the same guys they were supposed to be fighting against in Afghanistan.

Syria opposition aid: U.S. to give $60 million - POLITICO.com
 
Most of the stuff he pulls is in the public domain, either declassified, from FOIA requests, or just stuff that has always been out there, but not reported.

The part that gets on people's nerves is when he does stuff like take a U.S. Army document on internment procedures, then go apeshit about how we're all going into FEMA camps.

But with the military, and govt. in general, there's a lot of money spent planning for any possible scenario that could happen- not necessarily what they are planning to do, but how to react, should such a scenario ever arise. They pay people to think of the wildest shit they can think of, then draw up a plan on how to react.

He talked about it in that interview; basically admits he does theatrics because he wants people to be aware of it. Some people do buy into the fear though.

For those that made the statements how he makes shit up and twists facts, take note of this post. This is how you frame a proper argument. Had any of you brought this up I would have had to concede. Great post jryan
 
It is stories like these that make me wonder if Alex Jones is right...

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile

The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States.

Although I’ve seen and read several online blurbs about this vehicle of late, I decided to dig slightly deeper and discover more about the vehicle itself.

The new DHS sanctioned ‘Street Sweeper’ (my own slang due to the gun ports) is built by Navistar Defense (NavistarDefense.com), a division within the Navistar organization. Under the Navistar umbrella are several other companies including International Trucks, IC Bus (they make school buses), Monaco RV (recreational vehicles), WorkHorse (they make chassis), MaxxForce (diesel engines), and Navistar Financial (the money arm of the company).​

We keep calling him a crackpot yet he has been warning us about these purchases for a couple of years...
 
It's go back and look up Alex jones~~he has a proven track record

This. No matter what you can say about the guy, a certain percent of the time he is right on point and end up predicting shit that even if right 10% of time it's sucks balls for everyone involved. The bohemia vid or w/e it's called, if real, is some mind fuck shit. Him getting it right some of the time makes it easier to think he's right all the time. Nobody's that guy....

And Vice.com ftw. Not trying to hijack and not precisely related but not mainstream, should be known by more and just so happens to be some of the best content on the net imo.
 
Just finished listening to the whole stern episode.

Like 20figures mentioned, this is important because Jones just got advocation for an hour and a half to Stern's entire listenerbase, which is right in the middle of the mainstream, huge, and not likely to have heard AJ before.

The good news is that AJ did NOT come off as over the top on this episode like he did on peirs morgan. Yes he mentions a ton of conspiracies but he never goes full retard. Whew.

The bad news is that Stern was being uber annoying and kept moving the conversation to the size of his dick, how much drugs and what kinds he's taken, and when he lost his virginity. Really stupid shit that has nothing to do with the topics AJ came for.

Props to AJ for putting up with that shit without hanging up on stern.

Some more bad news is that Stern played a clip of AJ crying ridiculously over having some visions he had, and it sounded pathetic. Really embarrassing, and tells me that of course it was fake shit he did for ratings. (Not very well executed.) But AJ held his ground and explained why real men must cry sometimes.

Overall, I have no doubt that this will bring over a bunch more listeners to infowars. They'll be more liberal than usual, but they will come and be curious. Let's hope some of them find some of jones' stories believable and get their eyes opened.

If AJ's a disinfo agent, he'll be fired for this for sure!

Its the Howard Stern Show and he'll talk about the topics that his listeners are interested in which is about sex, drugs and thinks like that. Not crazy conspiracy theories
 
I think the next thing starting to creep into the mainstream (that he's talked about for some time) has to do with what happened in Libya and Syria, and how the "rebels" that the U.S. is helping out were the same guys they were supposed to be fighting against in Afghanistan.

Syria opposition aid: U.S. to give $60 million - POLITICO.com
From what I can tell, Syria was far more deserved to be invaded than Libya. Gaddafi wasn't the tyrant the media make him out to be. I haven't done enough reading on Syria to give a full opinion, but it does seem to be a lot more shitty + less democratic there. I know Al Jazeera (not unbiased, previously owned by the Qatari Royal Family, but a hell of a lot more unbiased than BBC/US News, imo) supported Gaddafi, but 100% sided with Syria's uprising. Not that that means much, appeal to authority, however it's something worth looking into.
a certain percent of the time he is right on point
Even a broken clock is accurate two times a day.