Another Law Against The Right To Assemble
- Thread starter Fiver
- Start date
Obama is what happens when you get a nigger in power that thinks he's whiter than George Bush
This is 2-week old news, but yeah, it's damn important. Listen to the Judge break it down correctly for you:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9d80FsWuEQ]Judge Napolitano - Obama Makes Free Speech A Felony!!! BILL H.R. 347 - YouTube[/ame]
There really are only two ways to do anything about this:
1. Get Ron Paul in the white house.
2. Get a million or two armed friends and go to the white house yourself.
Everything else is just wasted breath.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9d80FsWuEQ]Judge Napolitano - Obama Makes Free Speech A Felony!!! BILL H.R. 347 - YouTube[/ame]
There really are only two ways to do anything about this:
1. Get Ron Paul in the white house.
2. Get a million or two armed friends and go to the white house yourself.
Everything else is just wasted breath.
Wouldn't it be easy and accurate for news sites to write about this with headlines like "Obama would have arrested Martin Luther King Jr" and so forth?
I personally don't see what the big deal is, the government is just trying to protect the american people.
It certainly would... Which proves exactly how much the MSM is Obama's little Bitch.
DERP DERP OBMAMA TOOK AWAY MY RITE TO SIT ON THE VICE PRESIDENTS DESK WITH A COUPLE SIX SHOOTERS AND SHOUT AT HIM WHILE HE TRYING TO WORK
You know that the first step to solving your problem is to admit you have one, right JCash? Sometimes you troll just a bit too far.
Only because people do not know how to "keep" their rights.
Heck, it was a thread just recently and people can't even define what "rights" are...lol.
Logic defies them, but then again, people like to pontificate on subjects such as this but fail to reason as why "God" is an imperative part of the discussion. Not reason as "logically understand", but reason as having actually studied the subject and the importance of historical and social context of these ideas, but having only perceived knowledge of the subject from current educational standards. But keep on keeping on.
Heck, it was a thread just recently and people can't even define what "rights" are...lol.
Logic defies them, but then again, people like to pontificate on subjects such as this but fail to reason as why "God" is an imperative part of the discussion. Not reason as "logically understand", but reason as having actually studied the subject and the importance of historical and social context of these ideas, but having only perceived knowledge of the subject from current educational standards. But keep on keeping on.
Kinda hard to stay on top of things when the guv doesn't want me to know about it in the first place.
creepy shit. I want to write about how the SCOTUS will fix this and how this is so blatant that even a corrupt, bought and paid for SCOTUS can't support it. However, nothing will happen. No one will notice. No one will care. Move to Thailand, it's all over.
Only 3 people voted against HR 347, and Ron Paul was one of them. I think you're referring to the amended vote the day prior, which was irrelevant as it was going for a final vote on 2/28 which is linked to above. For anyone that is curious. these are the only 3 people that voted against the final amended version of the bill which passed:
Nay GA-10 Broun, Paul [R]
Nay MI-3 Amash, Justin [R]
Nay TX-14 Paul, Ronald [R]
Rand is a Senator. This was a House bill.
edit: I don't know how Rand voted on the Senate version but he seems more "establishment" than his dad so nothing would surprise me.