CBS calling for Scrapping the US Constitution!

lukep

He Hath Arisen
Sep 18, 2010
7,687
207
0
On the blockchain
This opinion piece aired on CBS recently is making an argument for retiring the constitution!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSlUKvpIeUc]Unconstitutional Constitutional Law Professor - YouTube[/ame]

Wow. Sounds like the Libs are getting really bold after how this 2nd amendment stuff played out...

For extra chuckles, check out his list of the "greatest presidents."
 


I'm all for dropping the constitution, as long as it also means dropping the state.
 
Yeah, if it wasn't created this year it sucks!

Ancient people didn't have the thought process to rule a nation, they didn't even have the internet! They couldn't even make computers or cars for that matter! What idiots!
 
You know the country is fucked when the guys that want to protect the constitution are radical terrorists and the guys that wanted to scrap it are mainstream
 
tumblr_m4r0ttHyBP1qefm89o1_500.jpg
 
You're not protecting us against tyranny with that assault weapon: Editorial

For those who strain to understand why anyone needs an arsenal of Uzis in his garage, here’s the standard argument: What restrains the American government from imposing all-out tyranny isn’t the rule of law, but a small contingent of gun hoarders.

You know who: the tin-can-shooting survivalists, armed with a stockpile of weaponry, a backpack full of food, a rabid fear of the United Nations and the utmost conviction that President Obama is secretly a communist. The Antichrist. Or both.

When these people hear “balance of power,” they’re not thinking the three co-equal branches of our federal government. No, what they’re thinking is the “jackbooted government thugs” vs. “my stash of rifles.” Because that’s what makes the United States government pause and reconsider its evil plans — right?

Never mind the independent judiciary, due process of law, democratic elections or founding principles such as the separation of church and state. As far as these guys are concerned, all that stands between civil society and total apocalypse is the Second Amendment. And by necessity, that includes everybody and their neighbor’s right to own rapid-fire, military-style rifles with body-armor piercing bullets. Assault weapons ban be damned.

But wait: If you’re truly locked in an arms race with the federal government, why stop there? Think about it: If you actually believe that the U.S. military would go along with a totalitarian scheme to gut American freedoms, hatched by some Grand Poobah in the White House, what good will your Bushmaster do against a professional fleet of shoulder-fired grenade launchers?

You’re going to need a bazooka, too. And if those “government thugs” that National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre warned us about, who “harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens,” decide to drive their armored battle tanks past the perimeter of your driveway, mortar rounds won’t do much. You’ve got to get yourself a military fighter jet. Or maybe a few missile-launching drones.

When civilization crumbles, you’ll be fighting your neighbors, too. So if the guy next door tramples your daffodils with his own personal armored tank and all you’ve got is a couple of Uzis, what does that make you?

Just another angry gunslinger planning an armed revolt against his own government, with a garage full of assault weapons and mags that nobody had better confiscate.

Does that sound like a “patriot” or a terrorist to you?

LOL at the comments:
You're not protecting us against tyranny with that assault weapon: Editorial | NJ.com
 
Lysander Spooner argued that the Constitution has absolutely no authority. I think his argument is sound.

The "Constitution" helps maintain the delusion is that there are limits on the state. Does anyone really believe that? That the state is restrained by what the Constitution says, and the President via veto and the Supreme Court will enforce the Constitution against the President, Congress and bureaucracies?

If so, PM me ASAP. I have a space station near Alpha Centauri to sell you.

I don't understand why Luke made this thread. I also don't understand how anyone can be outraged about anything the state does at this point. For the most part, it's irrelevant to our day to day lives, and it's completely ridiculous to be worked up about something none of us have the power to influence.

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.
 
The guy says, "Let's abolish the that irrelevant piece of shit from 200 years ago written by toolbag lawyers, but not really- let's keep parts that are important. Oh and by the way, the 2nd amendment is what I'm talking about here because it just stifles gun debate."

So basically he's arguing to amend the Constitution to eliminate parts of the bill of rights that he thinks are outdated, but do it without the whole process of ratifying the amendments, not to get rid of the document or the illusion of limits on the state.
 
I get that mic, my point is that every day, someone somewhere, says something, or proposes something, or legislates something, that may possibly, directly or indirectly, compromise someone's version of liberty.

And yet, my life goes on. Your life goes on.

No amount of bad ideas, or waving magic congressional wands over legislative parchment, will change 95% of our existence.

And even better than that, when things get bad, we can just move on (that's actually how America was founded). There is an amazing solution out there for libertarians called perpetual traveling.

None of us (in the west) are truly hostage to the stupidity, legislation etc of any government if we don't want to be.

I'm not saying we should have to go our own way (as some idiot statists on this forum have tried to argue) but we do have that option.

I am all for fighting a good fight, but I don't believe in martyrdom.

In the spirit of Doug Casey, I'd like to fight the state from an exclusive condo in Argentina, drinking whiskey, smoking a cigar and watching a polo match. YMMV.
 
Wow. Sounds like the Libs are getting really bold after how this 2nd amendment stuff played out...

I didn't watch it, I don't care, but in the much of the world rewriting constitutions, restructuring governments, is all expected and par for the course. Those countries rarely bomb the fuck out of anyone else.

Food for thought.
 
the worst thing about the world is that everyone is always trying to fix it.

the road to hell is... yadda yadda something something...
 
I don't understand why Luke made this thread.
It's simple. Like the rest of my 'alarmist' threads, here, I'm pointing out evidence of how fast the USA's deterioration is coming along. It's rapidly, if not exponentially, accelerating... Of course some may call this "gloating." ;)

I thought this was a pretty big story, actually. Think about it for a sec... This old fucktard is a "constitutional law professor" -which means dick to me but there are a lot of fucktards in this nation who would call him a "tenured defender" of the constitution. ...Yet he's clearly calling for it to be... Destroyed!

That's incredible. According to the law, he's literally a traitor and should be shot by any one of the millions of armed troops who swore a duty to defend the constitution against enemies both foreign and domestic.

I won't be surprised one bit if a soldier, or ex-solder snuffs him soon.

Yep, things are really starting to heat up now. And Bitcoin's up to $19.25 right now so it's pretty clear I've made some good choices lately. :banana_sml:
 
Suddenly Ass, do you need to be in every fucking thread? How about staying out of threads where we're actually having a serious discussion.
 
Umm... no offense, but I think getting rid of the constitution would more or less just be a formality at this point. It wouldn't actually have any effect though, as I think the constitution has been shredded for a while now.
 
Suddenly Ass, do you need to be in every fucking thread? How about staying out of threads where we're actually having a serious discussion.
That was the Gayest thing I've ever seen written on Wickedfire.


Umm... no offense, but I think getting rid of the constitution would more or less just be a formality at this point. It wouldn't actually have any effect though, as I think the constitution has been shredded for a while now.
As offensive as that is to most murikans, of course you are correct... But it's their Primary law document, you know? The thing every soldier, judge, and president swears to protect... What a dangerous game that would quickly become for those little-brains.
 
Most people who hold the Constitution dear are really more concerned with the Bill of Rights, which this guy jumps effortlessly between as if they are the same.

The Constitution controls the structure, duties, and basic low level procedures of the government. Those realistically could be made better, and early on he makes that case.
Changing the Bill of Rights though? Go fuck yourself.

that jackass said:
It's our country, we live in it, and we have the right to the kind of country we want
Fun fact: No you don't. Not if it means taking rights from other people.