Do you believe some individuals should be on a watchlist?

pewep

pewep

Banned
Nov 30, 2009
2,249
36
0
Do you believe some individuals in this country should be on a watchlist?

It's a simple question. For example all the people that have been shooting up/bombing theatres, churches, innocent folks....if the FBI had intel on them, would you agree that they need to be on a watch/kill list?

This is a very large country with PLENTY of wackos. And if you disagree, how would you deal with the growing number of lunatics?
 


No, because sooner or later everyone will end up on this list. This list has probably already been created. Don't you ever see the number of faces that come up on a screen when they're hunting for someone in the movies (CIA, FBI, etc).
 
  • Like
Reactions: pewep
So if it's an ineffective way of distinguishing between real threats and nonexistent ones, what other method would you propose?
 
THIS THREAD IS NOW ABOUT TOOTSIE ROLLS!

Tootsie_roll_small.jpg


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYfW53iE3Us]69 Boyz-Tootsie Roll - YouTube[/ame]
 
pewep said:
So if it's an ineffective way of distinguishing between real threats and nonexistent ones, what other method would you propose?
Click to expand...

It really comes down to not trusting a government with that type of list. Whats stopping them from adding someone to the list and immediately pulling the kill switch? You have to trust your government before you can trust them with your own safety.

My personal solution is citizenship in countries that don't extradite. It isn't cheap but it can be done.

Edit: So for you 1,000 post will you be posting a trolling guide?
 
CCarter said:
I feel like have these threads are pewep talking to himself and his alternative egos...
Click to expand...

shut up bitach b4 i slap da taste ri oucha mout

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk4DXpB_bDk"]Black Woman Goes Crazy at Sea World!!!.. - YouTube[/ame]
 
привет;1848355 said:
I think having a watchlist is just trying to put a bandaid on your finger when you cut yourself instead of practicing safer knife handling. What's to stop all the whackos from killing people? Maybe fix our sickening and empty hypocritical society.

Also you have to realize the government wants stuff like this to happen, if everything was peaceful people would start to question "hey why do we need this huge government controlling aspects of our lives and taking our income for it when we don't need them at all?" So with all this encouraged chaos via a fucked up society, they are essentially creating power for themselves to enforce and govern.
Click to expand...

Its much easier to kill than change an entire society.
 
No, that's the last thing you need, because it'll only have the opposite effect. Stop with the stupid conformity shit in society, and people would stop going crazy.

I just found this out about a week ago, but I guess we now have physch wards in our high-schools. Well, they don't call them physch wards, but that's what they are. My sister-in-law basically works triage at one. When kids first come in, she gets acquainted with them, and makes an initial assessment -- if it's just anxiety, or if they're going to go on a shooting rampage, or beat their parents head in with a bat, or whatever.

Loads of crazy kids she said, and most of them are from well off families with two loving parents, etc. Since when did our society move in the direction of requiring physch wards in our high schools?
 
Usually the Feds or local authorities know who the problems are. They manipulate and antagonize them to encourage violence and keep the police state that employs them and reinforces their world view.
 
pewep said:
It's a simple question. For example all the people that have been shooting up/bombing theatres, churches, innocent folks....if the FBI had intel on them, would you agree that they need to be on a watch/kill list?

This is a very large country with PLENTY of wackos. And if you disagree, how would you deal with the growing number of lunatics?
Click to expand...

Do you realize that violent crime has been decreasing for years? There is no "growing" threat, it just seems that way because of the Internets. Besides, governments kill far more people than any deranged lunatic could ever dream.

We really need protection from the government, but you (and your ilk) want the wolf guarding the hen house.
 
Everyone should have there own personal watch list. Im startin mine today... im the first on the list.
 
I see a whole lot of people giving reasons why it's a bad idea (and I get it) but nobody is offering any palpable alternatives. And "changing society from the ground up" is nowhere near practical. If you insist upon that as the only alternative, then we might as well keep the watch list.


And gunman, stop arguing semantics with me. Yes the violent crime % has gone down but the population has increased, therefore I am right. There are MORE lunatics, albeit a smaller percentage of our populous.
 
I'm not really trying to argue one way or another here and my opinions on the matter would surprise most of you guys. You guys are all about anarchy and overthrowing the establishment however you never look at the very fine details- the millions upon millions of thing you'd have to implement systems to because there is no autonomous solution to them (and which government addresses daily).
 
pewep said:
And gunman, stop arguing semantics with me. Yes the violent crime % has gone down but the population has increased, therefore I am right. There are MORE lunatics, albeit a smaller percentage of our populous.
Click to expand...

You want to be protected from people like the batman shooter and the guy that killed his boss at the Empire State building, but I would rather be protected from people like Hitler, Stalin, Obama, Mao etc. I base my argument on numbers, you base your argument on emotions.

Fuck you and your watchlists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom