Dru the blinger...

Status
Not open for further replies.


Tag Heuer is also awesome.. I have this one:

jomashop_1914_52447458


I think I'm actually going to go with the green Rolex here:

ro16610v.jpg


I'll bring both of them to Vegas to sport em out to ya!
 
Well i never brought myself to spend that kind of cash on a watch,,, 600-700 is usually my limit, i work from home and only wear them when i go out somewhere. I have Seiko's and Bulova,, the wanna be rolex, tag...lol.

Well maybe i will get the urge,,, nothing says i dont keep up with time like watches i don't wear daily.
 
You guys are insane... I would have to have such a rediculous amount of money before I spent thousands of dollars on a watch.

I'm slummin' it with a Freestyle - Shane Dorian.
76130.jpg
 
I can't get this damn watch to come out well, it must be the lighting, and my tweaky hands made it blurry. It's a Franck Muller.

*Full Disclosure: This was a graduation/birthday gift from a very loaded relative.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0786.JPG
    IMG_0786.JPG
    43 KB · Views: 32
z00pedup said:
dam thats out of focus.. but you can see the quality

nice addition to your collection
Click to expand...


I don't know WTF it is so blurry. I am just putting the camera close to it, trying with flash on and flash off. I have a Canon Elph digi cam, if someone wants to recommend some settings or mode or something to get this to come out right I can take a better pic.

I really only wear the Breitling, and not very much, maybe 3-4X a week. I wear it when I go out to nice dinner as well, every Friday.
 
engaged, take the picture in macro mode(the mode with the flower) and make the room VERY bright, but dont use flash. when I mean very bright, the brighter the better.

I think the blurriness might be because of two things: it's not in macro mode(or close up mode) and 2 because your shutter is open too long(and how long the shutter is open, at least in auto mode, is determined by how much light there is in the room.) try that out
 
Ok, still looks pretty shitty, but I tried my best.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0788.JPG
    IMG_0788.JPG
    88.8 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_0792.JPG
    IMG_0792.JPG
    69.2 KB · Views: 28
By the way, the F.M. time is not set. I need to get an autowinder to keep these things ticking since I don't wear them enough to keep them powered.
 
Oh 1 more thing, I think we've proved I have better tase in watches (Jon too) over Shoemoney. I don't know what's with his Movado thingy, but man, they are women watches.
 
engaged said:
Oh 1 more thing, I think we've proved I have better tase in watches (Jon too) over Shoemoney. I don't know what's with his Movado thingy, but man, they are women watches.
Click to expand...

The Breitling is nice, but that other one, not a good lookin watch,imo. I'm glad a relative bought it for you, you would need a slappin to spend $25k on that.
 
John said:
funny, I don't even own a watch.
Click to expand...

Come on John get with the program man! Its the in thing man:rasta:

Ohhh my show and tell, my turn

Check out this fine time piece! Cost about $5.00 to get it out of the fucking claw machine down there at the pizza shop.:338:

But what a fine time piece she is, genuine Japan quartz movement, glow in the dark hands, oh and numbers.........

watch.jpg


On a serious note I spent XXXX on a Tag a few years ago, lost it one night at a party and swore to never spend any more than $20.00 on a watch again
 
Here's my classic, I've had it for 15 years, but rarely wear it:

RolexBittiDatejust16233.jpg


Here's the one I prefer to wear, when I do wear a watch ($79 at Target):

amw320r1ev.jpg


And my back-up, rarely worn, but I'm a PUMA fan:

65769255.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom