Fact or Myth: Xrumer Links Pointed to your site - Case Study

stick2Herbs said:
lol u still mad that u didnt get a review copy?
Click to expand...

Nah, but i heard your mad cause you still got my jizz in your mouth. Now go make me a sammich you bitch peasant.

All you gotta do is look at their thread, complaint galore. Thats a lesson to everyone that should have seen they didnt have any valid reviews for their relaunch, even with all the complaints from their hoth 1.0 deal too.
 


eliquid said:
Nah, but i heard your mad cause you still got my jizz in your mouth. Now go make me a sammich you bitch peasant.

All you gotta do is look at their thread, complaint galore. Thats a lesson to everyone that should have seen they didnt have any valid reviews for their relaunch, even with all the complaints from their hoth 1.0 deal too.
Click to expand...

Lol calm down, I was just poking fun at how hard you tried to get a review copy after being rejected :rainfro:

oh and also

I-aint-even-mad-But-i-think-you-are.jpg
 
onthewayup said:
Btw, if you don't know what i'm talking about, visit the HOTH's thread where the OP tried to put the blame on the client that the xrumer profile links caused his site to be sandboxed, and not his package. :jester:
Click to expand...

eliquid said:
I've heard nothing but bad things about Hoth causing people to get deindexed and sandboxed.
Click to expand...

onthewayup said:
Hence this case study. Now, I'm not saying i'm a seo expert, but bullshit is bullshit. Xrumer links directly to your site does not sandbox your site, nor does it deindex your site. Duplicate content - and a good amount of it such as 5HOTHs - does.

Now, with this test, we can finally call bullshit to the myth that pointing xrumer profile links to your site will cause some type of harm** to your site.

** Harm to your site meaning a Deep decrease in rankings, or deindexing.
Click to expand...

stick2Herbs said:
lol u still mad that u didnt get a review copy?
Click to expand...

eliquid said:
All you gotta do is look at their thread, complaint galore. Thats a lesson to everyone that should have seen they didnt have any valid reviews for their relaunch, even with all the complaints from their hoth 1.0 deal too.
Click to expand...

Nothing biased about this study from competing vendors. :p

(Not saying you are, I know ya'll well enough to know, but these comments made me laugh)
 
I've tried these before and my results were that I've been ok just sending 20k links at a time spread apart to a site using one keyword on a month or two old site.

I've tried sending 2k dfb a day two or three keywords to a site for a bit over a month straight and 4 months later it is still having problems from it. but ranking well for the few short days it pops out of the sandbox before going back in.

I think the key to it is just not laser targeting keywords with it.
 
Not to hijack this thread, but I'm doing a few tests myself at the moment. Going to wait till the end to release the results, but if anybody wants anything else tested please hit me up via PM.

(Stuff I am testing at the moment, pinging links vs not pinging them (mattseh tool + linklicious), sending 5mill xrumer links to a new domain, sending 20k links per day to a new domain for a month etc).


I would say I am interested to see the results to this, but I already know that blasting xrumer to your money site is effective. Sure sometimes you hit the sandbox but I've never had a site that didn't come back eventually.
 
This is a good idea. I'm glad you decided to do it to one of your sites before I got the chance to do it to mine. :P

Personally, I won't ping the links in the future even if you DO stay indexed, but thats just because of my belief them slowly coming in might give you more authority then them all hitting at once.

I have a good feeling you'd stay indexed with the 20k, but pinging them, this will answer some questions I've been having for sure!

Thanks OP!
 
eliquid said:
Yeah, i dont do web 2.0's
Click to expand...

A link is a link, which is exactly what this case study is set to prove.

It doesn't matter if you are direct competition, comparable, an alternative, etc. Competition is competition. You sell backlinks, that's all that matters in a customer's eyes.

Anyhoo, I was just making a joke. As I said, I know you both well enough that I know you wouldn't be running your mouth trying to slander someone just because they were competition. They'd have cause.
 
Cool thread. I'm guessing if/when you get penalized it's more due to only using 1 anchor than getting a shit ton of links. 20k links with no constant velocity for one KW and nothing else is just asking for trouble, but maybe you'll prove me wrong.

Are you planning to just let the site sit after that one blast?

I just got another idea though: What happens when you point 100s of duplicate content articles/web2.0s at your competition? Is it really gonna get them deindexed? I kinda doubt it. Maybe it's worth testing on the trashbags niche or something.
 
greyaisha said:
Cool thread. I'm guessing if/when you get penalized it's more due to only using 1 anchor than getting a shit ton of links. 20k links with no constant velocity for one KW and nothing else is just asking for troubleg
Click to expand...

^^My thoughts exactly.

+rep to the op for doing this case study.

If this doesn't get you sandboxed, nothing will.
 
greyaisha said:
Cool thread. I'm guessing if/when you get penalized it's more due to only using 1 anchor than getting a shit ton of links. 20k links with no constant velocity for one KW and nothing else is just asking for trouble, but maybe you'll prove me wrong.

Are you planning to just let the site sit after that one blast?

I just got another idea though: What happens when you point 100s of duplicate content articles/web2.0s at your competition? Is it really gonna get them deindexed? I kinda doubt it. Maybe it's worth testing on the trashbags niche or something.
Click to expand...

i read that on bluhat seo, get your competitors article and dup content spam it with a link back to the competitors site.

the hoth used two of my own ezisting eza articles to create the hoh network. with very bad spins up to 69% match in some cases.

i guess google has some protection in place for websites because competitors can easily attack them with an xrumer profile link bomb. and is prolly common.

theyre probably not aware of dupe content bombs though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom