FTC Sweep - full info and documents
- Thread starter papajohn56
- Start date
- Status
They could try but since cloaking is easily detectable and the ad agency would just keep any money deposited if someone tried and blacklisted the client details I think it would be a pretty stupid idea on the cloakers part if the ad agency was at all competent or serious about stopping it. If you're just some guy spending a few hundred a day on sonar or something you'd probably be fine but who knows, if they had someone working there who knew how these things worked they would have a way to automatically check for cloaking or redirects even on approved ads.... What is probably more likely, they will remove all the bad ads first and then start only approving ads that are not against the rules ignoring any cloaking that goes on after that because they were not "aware" of it, collecting more revenue and only actually doing something about it when it is "officially" brought to their attention when they get called out on it by the FTC or something because hey they didn't know that was going on right? So maybe cloaking would be viable for a few months after they start disapproving these types of ads or maybe longer, who knows. All just speculation though but will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
The US Government is BROKE, so now its time to squeeze a few pennies!
I think thats how you should have said it.
Not to mention that if they follow the same route, they would have to go after 99% of the companies that run TV commercials. I am yet to see whitening toothpaste that will actually make your teeth whiter, not to mention the miracle herbal remedies that are advertised 24/7.
I just got 2 new LP ideas to replace "advertorials" $500 PayPal for anyone who proves they drove traffic to these
1. The FTC Scam Scam... Create an FTC Scam Warning page. Write content about have you seen any of these ads, or bought any of these products? Well most of them are scams because they don't work. The only 2 products proven to work and legit are acai X combined with Colon C.
2. Big Conglomorates Don't Want You to Lose Weight - Play on peoples misstrust of the government by saying the FTC is in the pockets of huge diet companies that don't want products that work so well with permenant results on the market so they are trying to kill off Acai and Colon.
1. The FTC Scam Scam... Create an FTC Scam Warning page. Write content about have you seen any of these ads, or bought any of these products? Well most of them are scams because they don't work. The only 2 products proven to work and legit are acai X combined with Colon C.
2. Big Conglomorates Don't Want You to Lose Weight - Play on peoples misstrust of the government by saying the FTC is in the pockets of huge diet companies that don't want products that work so well with permenant results on the market so they are trying to kill off Acai and Colon.
More documents for the interested (case files):
Copeac: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. IMM Interactive, Inc., a New York Corporation formerly known as Intermark Communications, Inc., also doing business as COPEAC and Intermark Media, Defendant
Coulomb Media Inc: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Coulomb Media, Inc., a corporation and Cody Low also known as Joe Brooks, an individual and an officer of Coulomb Media, Inc., Defendants (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan), Cas
DLXM, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. DLXM LLC, also doing business as DLX Marketing, a New York limited liability company, and Michael Volozin, also known as Mikhail Volozin, individually and as an officer or director of DLXM LLC, Defendants
Charles Dunlevy: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Charles Dunlevy, individually, Defendant (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia), Case No. 1:11-cv-01226-TWT
Zachary Graham: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Ambervine Marketing LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Encastle Inc., a Texas corporation, and Zachary S. Graham, individually and as officer of Ambervine Marketing LLC and Encastle Inc., Defendants (U
Beony International, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Beony International LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Mario Milanovic, individually and as an owner and/or member of Beony International LLC, and Cody Adams, individually, Defendants
Circa Direct, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Circa Direct LLC, and Andrew Davidson, Defendants (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey), Case No. 1:11-cv-02172-RMB-AMD
Tanner Vaughn: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Tanner Garrett Vaughn, individually and doing business as Lead Expose, Inc., and Uptown Media, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle), Case No. 2:11-cv-
Copeac: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. IMM Interactive, Inc., a New York Corporation formerly known as Intermark Communications, Inc., also doing business as COPEAC and Intermark Media, Defendant
Coulomb Media Inc: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Coulomb Media, Inc., a corporation and Cody Low also known as Joe Brooks, an individual and an officer of Coulomb Media, Inc., Defendants (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan), Cas
DLXM, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. DLXM LLC, also doing business as DLX Marketing, a New York limited liability company, and Michael Volozin, also known as Mikhail Volozin, individually and as an officer or director of DLXM LLC, Defendants
Charles Dunlevy: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Charles Dunlevy, individually, Defendant (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia), Case No. 1:11-cv-01226-TWT
Zachary Graham: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Ambervine Marketing LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Encastle Inc., a Texas corporation, and Zachary S. Graham, individually and as officer of Ambervine Marketing LLC and Encastle Inc., Defendants (U
Beony International, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Beony International LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Mario Milanovic, individually and as an owner and/or member of Beony International LLC, and Cody Adams, individually, Defendants
Circa Direct, LLC: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Circa Direct LLC, and Andrew Davidson, Defendants (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey), Case No. 1:11-cv-02172-RMB-AMD
Tanner Vaughn: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Tanner Garrett Vaughn, individually and doing business as Lead Expose, Inc., and Uptown Media, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle), Case No. 2:11-cv-
I have some insider info on one of the guys doing a BIG SCAM again which is currently ONGOING who tried and did use me as a 'fall guy' position just recently.... i jumped out of that situation once I started realizing EXACTLY what was happening.... I'm about ready to reveal his name, operation timeline / how he's doing it and the address he is operating out of ( i believe is his place of residence)
the reason I'm about to reveal what he is doing is because he has no urgency to remove EVERYTHING my name is tied to in which I keep asking him to do so IMMEDIATELY. these 3 guys were already sued for 6 million by the ftc and another suit for over 20 million and here they are doing it all over again. SCUM BAGS
the reason I'm about to reveal what he is doing is because he has no urgency to remove EVERYTHING my name is tied to in which I keep asking him to do so IMMEDIATELY. these 3 guys were already sued for 6 million by the ftc and another suit for over 20 million and here they are doing it all over again. SCUM BAGS
Way to blow your first post, admit to being disgruntled, and doing nothing about it still... Registered your account in April here, and decided to make your first post without anything following it or backing it up, trying to leverage attention here on a topic that's over four years old?
Find some place else to do it. You're banned. Don't bother with another account, I'll ban that too. Seriously, you can do this on Facebook, more people will care about your pity party there.
- Status