i don't think you guys realize what you're asking for.

Let's calm the "drama and tears" and just focus on the core issue here. Shall we?
The issue is the conflict of interest. Whose side is Nicky on? Wickedfire members want their private data, including IPs, protected. LPLockdown customers are paying Nicky $50/month to collect this data to be used on their behalf for cloaking. They would surely want it to come from Wickedfire too, as this is perhaps the most relevant group of people to cloak against.
Nicky has to decide and declare clearly whose side he is on. Because that's what is going to determine whether he will or will not scrape IPs from mod control panel. Here are the options:
1) Step down as a mod and keep selling whatever he wants
2) Announce on his blog that LPLockdown specifically does not and will not include Wickedfire IPs, because for him his Wickedfire mod role comes first before his paying customers
3) Keep ignoring the conflict of interest and acting like a complete douchebag
So far he has been going with Option #3. Sure he has a product to sell, but what is troubling is that Mods seem to be supportive of this douchebaggery. Admins made it clear that IP collection is not OK by turning off pixels in signatures, but have not stepped in to forcefully resolve the conflict of interest. I hope everyone should realize by now that the issue will not just go away, given how this thread got inflamed after everyone thought LPLockdown drama was over.
This is not just "shades of gray that Wickedfire thrives on". This is a real issue of trust because there is conflict of interest.
First, you came back with a claim about a red herring. The position you keep promoting is both a strawman and a red herring. It doesn't address what I have said at all. In fact, it seems to completely ignore the point I have made repeatedly, and clearly.
I never claimed he should be demodded. See, the problem is, yes, we have different premises. You must not have read my post in the LP Lockdown thread, that was made directly to you, and was re-posted by someone else here.
This is the strawman. There are a couple mods who keep pushing that people are claiming something they are not. Why? I have no idea. Forget Uber, he has low impulse control (which is typically a sign of low intelligence). He doesn't represent anyone but his own butt hurt. He certainly does not represent me.
I don't care if Nicky is a mod or not. I think it is a big tactical error on his part to be indignant and taunt people without addressing the fundamental issue folks have a problem with. That of course only matters if he is going to continue to be a public persona with his blog and possibly his service offering. If he is just going to do his own thing, then he can give the world the finger. But this bad boy businessman act only works when you are already at the top and people need your connections and capital. Not when you're building your business. But that's for him to figure out. Maybe he can be the first person to make it work, and if so, my hat is off to him.
WRT to breaking the rules, can you clarify for me whether it is acceptable to put 1x1 transparent pixels in all my posts or not? If I do so from now on will I be banned?
Stanley changed the sigs but it doesn't fundamentally address what Nicky did. Was it wrong, yes or no? If no, then I assume we can all put pixels in all of our posts from now on. If yes, then where is the accountability?
I think some folks are underestimating the intelligence of people on this forum. If there was a direct, concise and clear response, then people would mumble and grumble and it would go away.
But this "run out the clock" approach to addressing if something wrong was done or not, is encouraging the criticism to persist and to spread. That's why the threads keep popping up and more people are voicing their displeasure.
Back in the day, you could count on someone like Jon to lay it down, right or wrong, in black and white. You might not agree, but Daddy said it was bedtime and that was that.
Now, when any leadership would put much of this to rest, such leadership is absent and it's predictably chaotic around here.
And lastly, the issue isn't about shady stuff on the internet. If you do shady business, that's one thing. The community norm or set of social expectations (regardless of the rules) is that people play their games elsewhere, but game players can congregate here because people don't run those games on each other at the meeting place. That's why we call out scammers here. It's understood and doesn't need to be said.
If it was otherwise, then you would expect that I could order PM spam and forum spam blasts to be targeted at WF. But we both know that you expect me not to do that here, even if I might do it elsewhere.
No one has an issue with Nicky grabbing data from Cakes chat or his blog where he makes the rules. The issue is about doing at WF, where it still remains unclear whether what he did is acceptable or not. No one has been forthcoming about what the rules are here.
If it is acceptable, then I think you will see a lot of people doing it from now on.
I gotta do some work.
Looking at this from the outside in, only going to comment on the layers of business ethics that I see here (and since this bomb started). I could care less re sides or who's who, no homo and no hate to either of you - I run a M board too and here's how I would see it:
I think you'd have to be a blind idiot not to view your token celebrity mod (or any mod) pushing product to the community for profit (through social engineering/priv. post/edit/delete advantage or without), as a conflict of interest. Especially if part of that product was derived from data collected here (where you try to sell it back but reversed/blocked/monthly to your 'peers'...).
It's like you gained my respect by default due to your little icon/mod status, then you pick pocket my dime and show me that others are doing it too, and ask for a dollar a month to protect my future quarters/change. Even if you were selling me bibles, as a mod I think that's buck that you have that priv.
I think you'd have to be really naive to be cool with ANYBODY acquiring your data for profit at a social and or online business collective, where the objective is not to sell and pad each other for profit, but where business does exist for the collective benefit, and then have it waived in your face like this was/is. It shouldn’t matter that it’s ‘just an IP’, or it’s an LP, or it’s your email or other identifier, it’s a piece of the product… Product quality and price points are also irrelevant here, that's secondary. I think the core issue, which I agree with, is someone at the top with priv. is selling something to many underneath him within the group with advantage, and with data/portion of the product acquired, engineered and taken from the very people you’re selling to. The data+being a mod+being able to sell to the community with immunity combo, is def. something I'd be concerned about, and not allow. All the extra shit and 10 threads is a bunch of WTF not business. No respect gained/lost other than thinking to myself 'yep, only at WF' click the x come back later...
Next thing you know all the mods will soon have the most uber guber products selling them to everyone else here with padding and polished reviews from their alumni, while editing posts/threads that say otherwise... Dunno, was never big on boards where people sell shit to each other through these methods and allow xx threads to continue like a soap - isn't that the other WF? Don't you guys always beat the shit out of that forum for this? This is different how? At least they smile while trying to sell you shit?
If this many people and threads bashed me/my product or my current stance and ways as a leader among a group, I would def. bow out and then peddle my wares full force in other ways, or keep mod status and stop the prod promotion here altogether, or pay for it like most merchants (not with time/modding/favors) and allow the public to be critical without edits. I can only imagine how many people 'aren't' speaking up because of the ways of this place.
If the forum owner (president) has a product(s), that's one thing, but if the mods (or political parties) have these powers too, you start to be viewed as an al gore, and or being awarded a loose no bid no conflict contract to peddle remorcelessly to your own kind, and your readers (citizens) are the suckers here buying blindly because they are defaulted to trust and look up to you (whether your product is sliced bread or shit is irrelevant imo).
Sorry if opinions expressed touch nerves with any other mods. I also think if the person is setting up an aff program while peddling that product to the group, and has no out of pocket cost for the product (small bandwidth/software), you should give your products to all your affiliates (whom you hope to make you millionz) for free, not just the bigmouths/outreach. And give your peers here a hefty discount not available anywhere else..
.02 (post saved incase it gets edited because I might have said something too..?. . ...).
Simple enough to the rest of us.