Get Unlimited Backlinks By Submitting Spun Articles To Our PRIVATE Blog Network!
- Thread starter NPressPlatinum
- Start date
- Status
Those are getting fixed as we speak as it's part of the migration. The new subdomains will be indexed when the migration is complete. IPs are getting added as we speak also.
If someone wanted to find out your domains they could fairly easily even without showing the permalinks using footprints in the articles they post.
Or even checking the initial results in yahoo explorer and aggregating the results over time to find them all.
Theres just no way to stop that if someone really wanted to it would just take them a bit more time.
Logged into NPP this morning to get the lists of urls for a few of my recent article submissions. Instead, I find that we are now only allowed to see 10 article urls per submission -> the other 614 articles are secret.
With all due respect, not allowing your customers to access the urls of the articles they have submitted is a HORRIBLE idea.
As others have pointed out in this thread, the individual article urls for NPP almost never get indexed in Google. If a customer wants their NPP submission to be worth anything, he/she must use a tool like Backlink Energizer to make Google index the articles.
What have you done? This won't stop spammers from hitting your blogs: it just makes NPP worthless for its paying customers.
It's like your product just committed suicide.
With all due respect, not allowing your customers to access the urls of the articles they have submitted is a HORRIBLE idea.
As others have pointed out in this thread, the individual article urls for NPP almost never get indexed in Google. If a customer wants their NPP submission to be worth anything, he/she must use a tool like Backlink Energizer to make Google index the articles.
What have you done? This won't stop spammers from hitting your blogs: it just makes NPP worthless for its paying customers.
It's like your product just committed suicide.
PERMALINK list is VITAL for us - this is a really really bad move for us. Have been a supporter of ALL the changes to the system so far - but this one is not good.
wtf.. man I was SOO close to buying into this program like 1-2 weeks ago and have been waiting on how things are going/being handled before I jumped in.
Sorry you guys having issues, but glad I found out before jumping in.
Sorry you guys having issues, but glad I found out before jumping in.
Looks like there has been a U TURN on this - Excellent to see that NPP actually listen to their customer base !!
I have no clue why I wasn't getting email updates from this thread, but here I go.
No, I'm sure if you read the thread, the blogs really do exist and people are posting to them. Not exactly sure what you want to verify by looking at the blogs. Also, you don't give me your article. When you sign up with NPP, you will login to your very own back end and submit your articles through there.
Yes
We had taken this into consideration. But at the same time we do see it as a security risk. We have to wonder why are we just about the only ones that give out our permalinks to people's posts. There has to be substantial business reasons why other companies such as SEOLinkVine and LinkVana don't release any types of reports.
Also, we had a plan in place for an automated backlinking system that was going to automatically back link everybody's articles, but we are now going to make that a member upgrade.
I'm sure you have noticed that we have changed everything back. We had a partner to partner discussion and have come to an agreement on what's best for this.
I'm sure you know by now that it's been changed.
I'm sure you've noticed the change also.
This wasn't an issue with the network. Bet we were debating about network security. And this came up as a very important topic. Since then, we have recanted thing change as we know that a lot of people use the permalink lists for use of their clients.
NPP is running smoothly and fully operational.
Yes, we had a very long discussion yesterday and considered the input of many older members a newer members.
No, I'm sure if you read the thread, the blogs really do exist and people are posting to them. Not exactly sure what you want to verify by looking at the blogs. Also, you don't give me your article. When you sign up with NPP, you will login to your very own back end and submit your articles through there.
Yes
We had taken this into consideration. But at the same time we do see it as a security risk. We have to wonder why are we just about the only ones that give out our permalinks to people's posts. There has to be substantial business reasons why other companies such as SEOLinkVine and LinkVana don't release any types of reports.
Also, we had a plan in place for an automated backlinking system that was going to automatically back link everybody's articles, but we are now going to make that a member upgrade.
I'm sure you have noticed that we have changed everything back. We had a partner to partner discussion and have come to an agreement on what's best for this.
I'm sure you know by now that it's been changed.
I'm sure you've noticed the change also.
This wasn't an issue with the network. Bet we were debating about network security. And this came up as a very important topic. Since then, we have recanted thing change as we know that a lot of people use the permalink lists for use of their clients.
NPP is running smoothly and fully operational.
Yes, we had a very long discussion yesterday and considered the input of many older members a newer members.
The only other article service I've used like this is Linkdozer which was pretty secretive about being a 'closed' network yet permalinks were given in those reports.
Again I dont think not listing them stops anyone from doing anything harmful if they wanted, only makes it harder for paying people to get the most out of the service. It's a bit like copyprotection that only inconveniences users but doesn't stop people from obtaining illegally.
Again with those other services all I need to do is use a unique character string to find their network via my posts. And maybe their userbase is not as keen on the whole backlink your backlinks thing as people here would be.
Glad to see this has been put back to where it was. From what I understood the main problem was people spamming comments slowing the server which is a separate issue anyways.
Yes, we have blocked a bunch of bots that consistently strained the resources of our network. Most of them were from China and other countries and we are only allowing the main "important" ones in. I.e. Google, Yahoo, Bing and so on.
This might have an effect on some software such as scrapebox be it maybe it's proxies you are using or whatever other configuration the software may have.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but our blogs are running MUCH faster now!
Hi, I'm new to this thread but I see from reading most of the comments that this seems like an effective service and I'm very interested. You guys have had a couple updates, especially lately, so can you please give a short summary of the current structure? As in... approximately how many total C-class and D-class IPs are being used, how the subdomain thing is working, etc. Since I wasn't using the service back when you weren't doing subdomains yet, I'm not exactly sure about what this change means. Thanks.
- Status