I have to go see Harry Potter tomorrow night...

daily_picdump_745_640_12.jpg
[/QUOTE]

LOL i dont know why twilight is so popular.
 


justo_tx said:
Odd, I would have thought she was too young to be sagging that much already.
Click to expand...

they're tiny little things, but she's wearing a corset and floating horizontally over the ground so the camera angle is basically top down. It's probably the most flattering position she could be in considering the size of her boobs.

It's not worth spending $15 to go see the movie but it was a nice perk
 
Haven't seen such a boring movie in quite a while. Decided to watch it just because imdb gave it an 8.7 I lasted (slept) 45 minutes.
 
I think there will be another sequel.

When Harry was in the forest at the end of the movie with the resurrection stone, he simply dropped the stone down onto the ground and kept walking. I feel that in 3 years we will see another one come out were some deatheater or wanna-be death eater kids pick it up and try to resurrect Voldermot.
 
blogspotter said:
I hope they make another sequel, based on Tom Riddle maybe.
Click to expand...
Exactly what I said to the wife the other day. I could see J.K.Rowling writing a sort of 'Biography of Tom Riddle' that explains the whole thing about how he came to power. The books never covered his rise to power, creation of the Death Eaters or events while he was at school and leading up to killing Lily... Yeah, she and I are both kind of nerds when it comes to the series.
 
Rowling is starting that new site for Harry and she claims that she's been thinking about continuing the story or working with it in some way. I was bothered by the resurrection stone in the book and the lack of importance in the whole thing, actually, as well as some other mild inconsistencies that were never tied up very well. I'd like to see her play around with the characters a bit more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom