I would like to talk about baby penis

Apr 12, 2008
1,397
12
0
Wisconsin
With the debate in San Francisco going on. I would like to know where people or parents on here stand on the issue. My wife is what you would call an intactivist and has been doing alot of posting in various places online.

Do you think it is ok for a parent to decide on circumcising their child and if so. Why, what grounds things like that
 


I think circumcision is horrendous, however in America a parent should be able to decide whether or not they want to subject their son to such a procedure.

PS: It's a little ironic that a city like San Francisco whose politicians have no problem with abortion are taking this stance regarding baby penis.
 
Do you think it is ok for a parent to decide on circumcising their child and if so. Why, what grounds things like that
Who the fuck else is going to decide??? The Baby?!?

It just better not be the state. (!)

I have no idea which way is better and frankly I don't wanna know. What's done is done. But if I were expecting a son I'd find out quickly and choose the better choice for him. -Anyone trying to stop me would learn quickly the meaning of the word "futility."
 
Who the fuck else is going to decide??? The Baby?!?

It just better not be the state. (!)

I have no idea which way is better and frankly I don't wanna know. What's done is done. But if I were expecting a son I'd find out quickly and choose the better choice for him. -Anyone trying to stop me would learn quickly the meaning of the word "futility."
Yes the baby, when that baby is no longer a baby. Should a parent have the right to make that type of decision
 
Yes the baby, when that baby is no longer a baby. Should a parent have the right to make that type of decision

Yes.

There is enough government interference as it is. If I choose to smack my kid when he/she misbehaves, that's my choice. If I want my child to eat Mcdonalds, that's my choice.

If I want to make his penis more attractive, that's my choice.....

wait wut?
 
I watched my son get circumcised as I stood right next to the doctor. It still makes me cringe thinking about it, the procedure, pain, and crying he went through. I really didn't even think about if he had a choice at the time.
 
Here are the facts..

On the plus side, circumcised infants are less likely to develop urinary tract infections (UTIs), especially in the first year of life. UTIs are about 10 times more common in uncircumcised compared with circumcised infants.

Circumcised men may also be at lower risk for penile cancer, although the disease is rare in both circumcised and uncircumcised males. Some studies indicate that the procedure might offer an additional line of defense against sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including HIV.

Penile problems, such as irritation, inflammation, and infection, are more common in uncircumcised males.

Sounds like good reasons to have them circumsized.
 
PS: It's a little ironic that a city like San Francisco whose politicians have no problem with abortion are taking this stance regarding baby penis.

this...

So... it is cool to kill your child before it is born BUT it is immoral to cut off a little skin on your kids penis once it is born? Strange.
 
my wife is an RN who has horror stories about uncircumcised guys.. "it's a field day for bacteria" i'll leave it at that.
 
my wife is an RN who has horror stories about uncircumcised guys.. "it's a field day for bacteria" i'll leave it at that.
There are plenty of horror stories of circumcisions going wrong too. There's nothing inherently bad about being uncircumcised, but if you don't wash your dick, of course it's going to be a field day for bacteria.
 
1289119-this_thread_again_super.jpg
 
Here are the facts..







Sounds like good reasons to have them circumsized.

From the same source:

Despite the possible benefits and risks, circumcision is neither essential nor detrimental to a boy's health. The AAP and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) do not endorse the procedure as a way to prevent any of the medical conditions mentioned previously. The AAP also does not find sufficient evidence to medically recommend circumcision or argue against it.
Me personally, I'd rather just not have my son circumcised and instead teach him how to wash his dick and use condoms when he has sex. Then later in life he can make the decision for himself without any problem without facing related STD or nasty dick problems.

It just scares the shit out of me to think it could get messed up and he'd have to live with a messed up dick for the rest of his life because I chose to have a piece of his dick cut off when he was a baby: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,511809,00.html
 
My boy has had the chop, but i prefer that others do not... Then i can call them names like ant eater and misile silo.
 
Other than the off chance that they fuck it up, what are the reasons to keep it?

The main thing I have seen is retarded men crying that they do not feel like a real man because a tiny piece of skin was taken from them. Doing anything to get it back (their man hood) when we all know their problem is not foreskin its being a wiped pussy.

Circumcised penis, look better, are more socially accepted, look longer(lol), are easier to clean, and may make you more disease resistant. Just wait to see how pissed you teenager gets because girls wont suck his dick because it looks weird. Because girls are not shallow at all...
 
Although I’m circumcised myself I’ve come to the realization that the procedure undermines the evolutionary purpose of the forskin.

Circumcision desensitizes: Circumcision desensitizes the penis radically. Foreskin amputation means severing the rich nerve network and all the nerve receptors in the foreskin itself. Circumcision almost always damages or destroys the frenulum. The loss of the protective foreskin desensitizes the glans. Because the membrane covering the permanently externalized glans is now subjected to constant abrasion and irritation, it keratinizes, becoming dry and tough. The nerve endings in the glans, which in the intact penis are just beneath the surface of the mucous membrane, are now buried by successive layers of keratinization. The denuded glans takes on a dull, grayish, sclerotic appearance.

Circumcision disables: The amputation of so much penile skin permanently immobilizes whatever skin remains, preventing it from gliding freely over the shaft and glans. This loss of mobility destroys the mechanism by which the glans is normally stimulated. When the circumcised penis becomes erect, the immobilized remaining skin is stretched, sometimes so tightly that not enough skin is left to cover the erect shaft. Hair-bearing skin from the groin and scrotum is often pulled onto the shaft, where hair is not normally found. The surgically externalized mucous membrane of the glans has no sebaceous glands. Without the protection and emollients of the foreskin, it dries out, making it susceptible to cracking and bleeding."

Source: Mothering: The Case Against Circumcision

Whether you think having a foreskin is a good or a bad idea you have no right to impose your biases on your son. It is his penis, not yours.

The fact that it is forced on helpless babies and okayed by indifferent or culturally brainwashed parents is appalling. The few males that choose to get circumcised later in life are free to do so.
 
Although I’m circumcised myself I’ve come to the realization that the procedure undermines the evolutionary purpose of the forskin.



Source: Mothering: The Case Against Circumcision

Whether you think having a foreskin is a good or a bad idea you have no right to impose your biases on your son. It is his penis, not yours.

The fact that it is forced on helpless babies and okayed by indifferent or culturally brainwashed parents is appalling. The few males that choose to get circumcised later in life are free to do so.

Sheesh... what's your opinion on abortion?
 
Although I’m circumcised myself I’ve come to the realization that the procedure undermines the evolutionary purpose of the forskin.



Source: Mothering: The Case Against Circumcision

Whether you think having a foreskin is a good or a bad idea you have no right to impose your biases on your son. It is his penis, not yours.

The fact that it is forced on helpless babies and okayed by indifferent or culturally brainwashed parents is appalling. The few males that choose to get circumcised later in life are free to do so.

Right. And I bet you let your kid decide what they want to eat from the moment they can point at food, right?

What an asinine opinion. Your JOB as a parent is to impose your biases on your children. It's called PARENTING.
 
I'm circumcised and I can tell you that there's no lack of sensitivity in that region, at least for me. Hell, if I still had a foreskin, it would probably be so sensitive I'd cum before I even got my pants off. I'm in no way yearning to have my long lost foreskin back. My wife and I are expecting our son in a couple of months, and we're getting him clipped. Mainly for all the reasons that Dreamache pointed out.