Iranian Regime Cracks Down On Citizens Protesting Rigged Election

Status
Not open for further replies.

hellblazer

New member
Sep 20, 2008
3,019
86
0
I'm fairly sure it's far more than simply one dead, but the media is too busy whitewashing this brutal repression in order to lend legitimacy to the 'dialogue' Mr. Teleprompter wishes to have with the Mullahs. Good luck with that.

One Iranian dead as shots fired at rally

Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:32pm EDT​

​

By Parisa Hafezi and Fredrik Dahl

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's hardline Islamic Basij militiamen killed at least one person on Monday and wounded more when their building was attacked by demonstrators protesting an election they say was stolen by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

An Iranian photographer at the scene witnessed the shooting, which came during a demonstration by tens of thousands in the capital Tehran in support of opposition candidate Mirhossein Mousavi who has appealed the election result.

Shooting was also heard in three districts of wealthy northern Tehran, residents said.

Members of Iran's security forces have at times fired into the air during two days of the Iranian capital's most violent unrest since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and used batons to beat protesters who have pelted police with stones.

The Basij militia is a volunteer paramilitary force fiercely loyal to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who has the final say on all matters of state in Iran.

Earlier during the rally, a Reuters reporter said Mousavi supporters had formed a human chain outside the Basiji building in order to prevent any trouble when demonstrators passed it.

Shouting "Allahu Akbar" (God is greatest), the crowds converged on Revolution Square, where Mousavi addressed part of the crowd through a loud hailer and held his fists clenched above his head, in a sign of victory.
The protest took place in defiance of an Interior Ministry ban and was a reply to Ahmadinejad's state-organized victory rally, which also drew vast crowds to Azadi Square on Sunday.

Supporters stretching along several kilometers (miles) of a Tehran boulevard waved green flags, Mousavi's campaign colors, and held portraits of him aloft as they tried to take pictures on their cellphones -- even though his words could not be heard above the noise of the crowd.

Mousavi, smiling and looking relaxed, had said he was ready in case the election was re-run, state television said.
"Mousavi, take back our votes," the marchers chanted before Mousavi appeared, along with other pro-reform leaders who backed his call for Friday's election result to be overturned.

Ebrahim Yazdi, leader of the banned opposition Freedom Movement, said Ahmadinejad's attacks on his opponents had opened a "Pandora's box" of divisions within the establishment and between the people and their government.

"It is the biggest crisis since the revolution," he said.
The disputed election has dismayed Western powers trying to induce the world's fifth-biggest oil exporter to curb nuclear work that they suspect is for bomb-making, a charge Iran denies.

U.S. "DEEPLY TROUBLED"

U.S. President Barack Obama has said he is ready to engage with Iran if it "unclenches its fist," but the U.S. State Department said it was "deeply troubled" by reports of violence and voting irregularities in the election.
"We are deeply troubled by the reports of violence, arrests and possible voting irregularities," said State Department spokesman Ian Kelly, adding that Washington was still assessing what had happened in the election.
The European Union increased pressure on Iran to agree to opposition demands to investigate Ahmadinejad's landslide election victory and halt a crackdown on protesters.

France, Germany and Britain led the EU campaign to persuade Iran to clarify the election results.
In Paris, Foreign Ministry spokesman Eric Chevallier said Iran's ambassador had been summoned to hear French concerns over "the brutal repression of peaceful protests and the repeated attacks on the liberty of the press and freedom of speech."

Britain said it was worried that events in Iran might affect any future international engagement with its government.
"The implications are not yet clear," said British Foreign Secretary David Miliband. "What we know is that there has been no Iranian response to the outreach that has been made by the international community, including the United States."

The protests over Ahmadinejad's re-election are the sharpest display of discontent in the Islamic Republic for a decade -- and have drawn broader support than the student unrest of 1999.

"I just want to show the president that we are not bandits," said Maryam Sedaghati, a pro-Mousavi demonstrator in her 20s wearing a green headscarf. "I want my vote back."

A retired 61-year-old teacher who gave his name only as Ali said the rally recalled the 1979 Islamic revolution. "We used to protest against the shah in this street. I'm so sorry that now we have to walk the same street to preserve our rights."
 


Idiots. If they hadn't killed anyone, this could have faded away in a week or two...

Yea, I don't think this is going away anytime soon, pics:

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


Best of luck to our Iranian bros
 
i personally don't care and not surprised. to me they're all idiots for letting their society exist the way it has for thousands of years. they should have revolted and dumped the religious shit 500 years ago.
 
i personally don't care and not surprised. to me they're all idiots for letting their society exist the way it has for thousands of years. they should have revolted and dumped the religious shit 500 years ago.
There's a whole number of people that think the exact same thing about the western world/Christianity.
 
i personally don't care and not surprised. to me they're all idiots for letting their society exist the way it has for thousands of years. they should have revolted and dumped the religious shit 500 years ago.
Yes, because these Iranian protesters definitely had control over what happened 500 years ago.
 
I'm fairly sure it's far more than simply one dead, but the media is too busy whitewashing this brutal repression in order to lend legitimacy to the 'dialogue' Mr. Teleprompter wishes to have with the Mullahs. Good luck with that.

Funny, because it's the only thing I've seen on the news for the past two days. NBC even showed pictures of dead bodies and said something about not knowing the true number of dead.
 
i personally don't care and not surprised. to me they're all idiots for letting their society exist the way it has for thousands of years. they should have revolted and dumped the religious shit 500 years ago.
Iran's been the way it has for the last 60 yeas because the US didn't like the fact that they thought Iran was becoming a communist state when the Iranians finally figured the Brits were screwing them over with their monopolistic oil drawing practices, and then basically walked out on the Shah when he actually needed the help
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Revolution
 
Funny, because it's the only thing I've seen on the news for the past two days. NBC even showed pictures of dead bodies and said something about not knowing the true number of dead.
The right twitter profiles are at least enough to know we seem to be vastly undercounting the dead so far.
Of course, it's now flooded with fakes so it's hard to find new sources.
 
Most sources have stated only 9 or 10 people have died so far. The rallies for Mousavi have been incredibly huge, nothing like Iran has ever seen before since the revolution. But the western media also fails to show the huge rallies in favour of Ahmadinejad. Contrary to what most may think, Ahmadinejad is still very popular with a large number of Iranians. In fact, even though I strongly suspect there is something fishy with the electoral results, I'm pretty sure he did win most of the votes anyhow.
i personally don't care and not surprised. to me they're all idiots for letting their society exist the way it has for thousands of years. they should have revolted and dumped the religious shit 500 years ago.
What the fuck are you talking about? Iran has only been an Islamic country for 30 years. Up until 1979 Iran had been ruled by a non theocratic monarchy for thousands of years.
 
What the fuck are you talking about? Iran has only been an Islamic country for 30 years. Up until 1979 Iran had been ruled by a non theocratic monarchy for thousands of years.
He/she is not referring to the type of rule, but the fact that Iran has developed into the islam republic it is today through a long process. It's not only during the years since 1979 that Iran has applied preferences to Islam and its followers from an official point of view. For example, when Persia was conquered the people were supposed to convert to Islam. Following, people who submitted to the religion of Islam were given more land. It is also a known fact that during the years 800-900 A.D. the policies put forth were put into a muslim context.
 
Quick question... I hate the mainstream media as much as the next guy, but how is everyone going to bitch about them under-reporting the news in Iran, when there are no U.S. reporters allowed in Iran right now?
 
I'm just trying to ignore the frenzy of reporting that I'm hearing, and trying to get my thoughts together on this in a rational way. Here we go.

Much of the sympathy towards the protestors is based on the assumption that the vote was rigged.

The protesters are a vocal minority which are unlikely to be representative of the entire population; pre-election polls showed quite a large majority in favour of Ahmadinejad. The opinions and protests (and the sympathy by Western media) is showing one rather limited side of the story.

Granted it sounds like the militia are getting heavyhanded, but again we're only getting one side of the story there.

Just to note: I am not Iranian and I have no preference over which side gets into power (though it would certainly be nice to have the Iranian people decide fairly).
 
Quick question... I hate the mainstream media as much as the next guy, but how is everyone going to bitch about them under-reporting the news in Iran, when there are no U.S. reporters allowed in Iran right now?
Some countries other than the U.S. have news. And reporters.
 
Good for them, these protesters are brave for standing up in a police state. From what I've heard Ahmadinejad seems to have support in the countryside whereas the cities support the other guy.
 
This week, I found myself surprised at the emergency of Twitter as a political tool, and the "Tweetolution" that has transpired. I found it pretty boring before, because it was mostly about self promotion or who's eating Pop Tarts or bought new socks. I still read there rarely, and mostly auto-tweet, but today I have respect. Twitter is ballin'.
 
I get goosebumps just thinking about this shit. When in the history of the world have people ever been able to use their own voice like this without being filtered by a biased (and by biased I mean swayed by money, not necessarily politics, popeye) or controlled media.

This is a huge step forward for humankind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.