Joe McCarthy Comes To Wickedfire To Fight The Red Menace

IceToEskimos

Banned
Oct 18, 2011
5,415
130
0
www.linkedin.com
H2Hg4TT.jpg
 


Are there going to be extenuating circumstances taken into account. I only ask because some of the (now endagered) red rep group are members that have positive itrader, accounts that are reasonably aged and have a number posts.

Just for clarification. :)
 
Are there going to be extenuating circumstances taken into account. I only ask because some of the (now endagered) red rep group are members that have positive itrader, accounts that are reasonably aged and have a number posts.

Just for clarification. :)

Worried that your inventory of positive itrader, reasonably aged wickedfire accounts is in jeopardy?

If faggots don't wanna get banned, they shouldn't have red bricks...

-----

Edit: Hey I found one! http://www.wickedfire.com/members/clickrich.html
 
I'll give you an example since you seem to have trouble comprehending.

highranking999

Could be a complete douche but has been here for the last to years, provided a service that seems to have had no complaints (100% itrader) and, except for the red rep, would be considered a model citizen of the forum.

He's not the only one, but I'm sure you get the idea.

I'm actually not sure why I'm even responding tbh, Ice gave me the answer I was looking for.
 
I think the red here on WF is more a reflection of how trigger happy we are against noobs/new people not necessarily the idiotism of the account in question
 
I'll give you an example since you seem to have trouble comprehending.

highranking999

Could be a complete douche but has been here for the last to years, provided a service that seems to have had no complaints (100% itrader) and, except for the red rep, would be considered a model citizen of the forum.

He's not the only one, but I'm sure you get the idea.

I'm actually not sure why I'm even responding tbh, Ice gave me the answer I was looking for.

I guess the question is whether someone that doesn't contribute to the community in a positive way should be able to profit from the marketplace.
 
I guess the question is whether someone that doesn't contribute to the community in a positive way should be able to profit from the marketplace.

The argument for that would be: If they are providing a service that people want to pay for, they are already contributing to the community regardless of how well they may fit in socially here.