[LINK ANNIHILATION] - LSI CONTENT+ARTICLE DIR+WEB 2.0+DOC SHARING+WIKIS+EDU+MORE=$85!

Status
Not open for further replies.
REVIEW

I will start by sharing the serp movement

Initial rankings:

kw 1: 4
kw 2: 4
kw 3: 3
kw 4: 1

Current rankings:

kw 1: 3 (+1)
kw 2: 5 (-1)
kw 3: 1 (+2)
kw 4: 2 (-1)


So, just received my report, so i guess the rankings will be dancing for a while.

Speed: The OP delivered the report in 7 business days, so 5/5

Communication: Very well, he answered and followed every instructions. 5/5

Price: For the amount of work, the price it's good.5/5

Quality: The quality it's good. A few profiles were not working properly, but that's a very small problem. You get exact link of everything, profiles, article directories, wiki, web, etc. You Also get the username and password, if you want to edit something. 4.5/5

Overall review: I would rate this service 4.5 out of 5, and would recommend
 


flx89 said:
REVIEW

I will start by sharing the serp movement

Initial rankings:

kw 1: 4
kw 2: 4
kw 3: 3
kw 4: 1

Current rankings:

kw 1: 3 (+1)
kw 2: 5 (-1)
kw 3: 1 (+2)
kw 4: 2 (-1)


So, just received my report, so i guess the rankings will be dancing for a while.

Speed: The OP delivered the report in 7 business days, so 5/5

Communication: Very well, he answered and followed every instructions. 5/5

Price: For the amount of work, the price it's good.5/5

Quality: The quality it's good. A few profiles were not working properly, but that's a very small problem. You get exact link of everything, profiles, article directories, wiki, web, etc. You Also get the username and password, if you want to edit something. 4.5/5

Overall review: I would rate this service 4.5 out of 5, and would recommend
Click to expand...

Awesome Review! We took the suggested changes and implemented on your package as well. Also, we gave you extra profile links to make up for any deleted. If that number continue to rise for some reason, just hit us up and we'll fix it guaranteed.
 
Link Destruction Review

I received my report for the Link Destruction Package.

Communication: 5/5
I provided some instructions regarding how I wanted some parts of this packaged processed and the OP delivered on those instructions. Along the way, the OP kept me apprised via email as to the status. A 1000 word LSI article was provided. I asked to review the article first, which the OP let me do. There were only minor errors in the article that I corrected. Probably for this type of package, it's not critical but I would rather start off with a solid article that addresses a niche properly prior to creating spun versions.

Report: 5/5
OP delivered a report that is tabbed breaking each deliverable down into a section for easy review.

Profile links:
30 were provided in this package. These are the typical profile links spread about a diverse set of forums. Some allow a keyword anchor text link while others are less effective with a www button linking to your page. The page PR for many of the forums varies with one being a PR7. Unfortunately, anchor text link is not present for this profile but a plain text link is (non clickable). I don't know if that is temporary or not. User name and password is provided to add content to the forums.

EDU Profiles.
I like an assortment of keywords were used. OP provided several different PRs with the highest being a 5. Typical forum sign ups. User name and password provided so content could be added.

Moodle Page links on EDU sites.
10 links were provided here, however, three were page not found so they may have been deleted by the admin. I spot check these and found my spun articles that the OP provided. An image was also provided with the article which was a nice touch. PRs were 1 through 4 for these links, with one PR5.

Article Directories
25 submissions were done into various article directories. I have not heard of most of these sites, however, some are placed on .org sites. The OP used some images in these articles. I would recommend providing images if you have any brandable product/service so that another company's product isn't inadvertently shown in the article.

5 Document Sharing Sites
A spun article with image was provided for each submission. Again, I would caution what images are used and suggest the OP only uses the images you provide unless they are truly generic images.

WikiLinks and Web 2.0 properties
Spun articles provided on multiple sites. Articles read fairly well and an image is included to dress it up a bit.

Overall Value: 4/5
There is a lot of effort put into this package by the OP. All the work was performed as described. Is this package worth it? I ordered this to maintain existing rankings for my keywords and for overall link diversity which I believe this package definitely provided. Can't judge the overall SEO value at this point as this package was just completed. I provided a 4/5 because of the images included. For my market, it is something that matters. For more generic niches you wouldn't have a problem.
 
atinmich said:
I received my report for the Link Destruction Package.

Communication: 5/5
I provided some instructions regarding how I wanted some parts of this packaged processed and the OP delivered on those instructions. Along the way, the OP kept me apprised via email as to the status. A 1000 word LSI article was provided. I asked to review the article first, which the OP let me do. There were only minor errors in the article that I corrected. Probably for this type of package, it's not critical but I would rather start off with a solid article that addresses a niche properly prior to creating spun versions.

Report: 5/5
OP delivered a report that is tabbed breaking each deliverable down into a section for easy review.

Profile links:
30 were provided in this package. These are the typical profile links spread about a diverse set of forums. Some allow a keyword anchor text link while others are less effective with a www button linking to your page. The page PR for many of the forums varies with one being a PR7. Unfortunately, anchor text link is not present for this profile but a plain text link is (non clickable). I don't know if that is temporary or not. User name and password is provided to add content to the forums.

EDU Profiles.
I like an assortment of keywords were used. OP provided several different PRs with the highest being a 5. Typical forum sign ups. User name and password provided so content could be added.

Moodle Page links on EDU sites.
10 links were provided here, however, three were page not found so they may have been deleted by the admin. I spot check these and found my spun articles that the OP provided. An image was also provided with the article which was a nice touch. PRs were 1 through 4 for these links, with one PR5.

Article Directories
25 submissions were done into various article directories. I have not heard of most of these sites, however, some are placed on .org sites. The OP used some images in these articles. I would recommend providing images if you have any brandable product/service so that another company's product isn't inadvertently shown in the article.

5 Document Sharing Sites
A spun article with image was provided for each submission. Again, I would caution what images are used and suggest the OP only uses the images you provide unless they are truly generic images.

WikiLinks and Web 2.0 properties
Spun articles provided on multiple sites. Articles read fairly well and an image is included to dress it up a bit.

Overall Value: 4/5
There is a lot of effort put into this package by the OP. All the work was performed as described. Is this package worth it? I ordered this to maintain existing rankings for my keywords and for overall link diversity which I believe this package definitely provided. Can't judge the overall SEO value at this point as this package was just completed. I provided a 4/5 because of the images included. For my market, it is something that matters. For more generic niches you wouldn't have a problem.
Click to expand...

Everytime we get a review, we learn something we can change in our package. Thank you very much for your review, and I sent you an email about the images.
 
UPDATE

- From now on, we will be including 1 link to an authoritative property from all articles. Authoritative properties include links from Google, Wikipedia, major news publications (CNN.com,etc.). This will be based on YOUR niche, so you'll receive authoritative links around your keyword!

Thanks guys for all the orders so far!
 
ill try the small package. Do a good job and ill order a few larger ones.
Your transaction ID for this payment is: 23B6736603314521M.

Details were sent on your order form.

Positions:

#11
#9
#9
 
Dresden14 said:
ill try the small package. Do a good job and ill order a few larger ones.
Your transaction ID for this payment is: 23B6736603314521M.

Details were sent on your order form.

Positions:

#11
#9
#9
Click to expand...

Got your order, thanks. Check your email, something is wrong with the payment. Email me.

yrre7 said:
is there any discounted copy left?
Click to expand...

Dresden14 took the last discounted copy :(

erichhrich said:
Il place an order tomorrow once I get my payout
Click to expand...

Gracias!

LinkBoom said:
Order placed. Will update with SERP review.
Click to expand...

Hoping for #1 for your keywords (aren't we all) :)
 
Review

Received review:

Link reports are in .xls and easy to follow.

Articles are readable (good enough) , and each property site that allow pics has then and look nice and neat.

The profile links are all accounted for some do not have anchors and are http:// .... but that is good mixes things up a bit.

The Moodle pages looked good but had <h1> code in the actual article not that is make a difference but just looks off a little bit, all links accounted for.

EDU Profiles - Links all accounted for look good.

Article Dirs - All accounted for look good

Doc Sharing - All accounted for look good

Wiki Sites - All accounted for look good

Overall I give this pack "good" rating, if your looking to diversify your back-link profile a bit this would help. I cannot comment on SERP improvements, I blasted this sites with some heavy blog posts a week or so ago so hard to tell what is going on.
 
zingo said:
Received review:

Link reports are in .xls and easy to follow.

Articles are readable (good enough) , and each property site that allow pics has then and look nice and neat.

The profile links are all accounted for some do not have anchors and are http:// .... but that is good mixes things up a bit.

The Moodle pages looked good but had <h1> code in the actual article not that is make a difference but just looks off a little bit, all links accounted for.

EDU Profiles - Links all accounted for look good.

Article Dirs - All accounted for look good

Doc Sharing - All accounted for look good

Wiki Sites - All accounted for look good

Overall I give this pack "good" rating, if your looking to diversify your back-link profile a bit this would help. I cannot comment on SERP improvements, I blasted this sites with some heavy blog posts a week or so ago so hard to tell what is going on.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your review! We're going to look at additional package that'll take this from 'good' to 'muy bueno'! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom