The bold = by nature.
I'm not sure where the hang up is?
Environmental factors aren't completely tied to nature you fucking red pill moron.
The bold = by nature.
I'm not sure where the hang up is?
Environmental factors aren't completely tied to nature you fucking red pill moron.
Where are all of the transgender lions? Why do lions have such rigid gender roles?
Yeah I totally agree. The reality is that it's a mix of biological and environmental factors.
The bold = by nature.
I'm not sure where the hang up is?
Transgender is just a social construct. Gender roles are determined by nature.
And where do any environmental factors come from that aren't a part of nature? Answer: There aren't any.
Emotions are easier than logic though, so feel free to have at it.
I think the hangup is that you wrote this:
You're explicitly drawing a line between nurture vs nature. Then you followed it up with:
You're not using logic here, there's an obvious logical fallacy here and you're using semantics to mask it.
If environmental factors are all just part of nature (as in, part of our natural state), you contradict your first statement because transgendered people are just a part of nature and there's no nature vs. nurture issue.
There's probably some cognitive dissonance going on here. The 2nd statement is the logical part of you recognizing that there's no bright dividing line between biological and environmental factors.
But the 1st statement is tied to a specific worldview and emotionally held. It makes no logical sense*. You're basically saying that human sexuality is determined 100% by nature...until it becomes 100% determined by social factors...and the dividing line happens to align 100% with your worldview. Hmmm.
*Unless you're going all in on the transgendered lion argument?.
I've really just been carrying on for a while to see how long people would keep going.
Nah you got owned pretty hard and now you're trying to save face. Fuck off and finish up that backlog of gambling articles.
Getting people riled up is fun.