Man beheads sister, walks to the police station [LIKE A BOSS] with her head in India

Putting aside the obviously grotesque thing that this guy did to her sister, it's always interesting to me how in western culture we arguably have the complete opposite extreme as what we would see in Eastern and Middle-Eastern cultures. Here in the west, our culture is basically infested with cheating and extra-marital affairs and many of us have probably become desensitized to these things so much that it almost seems normal. I mean, we even have dating sites for cheaters like ashleymadison.com.

Then you have these Islamic nations that take cheating and extra-marital affairs very seriously. It's not only shunned culturally, but even the government intervenes and stoning to death or hanging isn't uncommon in countries like Iran.

Both extremes are bad in my opinion, but at least in these Eastern and Middle-Eastern cultures, you at least help to maintain the nuclear family by shunning cheating/affairs. I mean, what typically happens when either the man or the wife cheat? Fighting, divorce, family instability and you basically emotionally screw your kids too.

Let me also add that in countries like Iran, getting a divorce is much more difficult than in the states. You typically need the husband's approval and there is no such thing as "no fault divorce" which makes either the husband or wife able to divorce whenever they want for no reason.

Do you see where I'm going with this? The point I'm trying to make is that making cheating wrong as part of the culture, taking extreme measures when cheating occurs, and making divorce harder to obtain all make it so that the nuclear family doesn't dissipate like it did in America, and breaking down the family has horrible outcomes for children.


Only if the world had a religion free from extremes, that preached a middle way...
 


SAY THAT TO MY FACE BRO NOT ONLINE

tumblr_m2b4h0f6e11r1cnedo1_500.gif
 
Interesting fact that many people are surprised to learn - adultery does NOT refer to a married man cheating on his wife, as long as it isn't with a married woman.

The crime of adultery as described in the Bible is only a crime against a woman's husband. In other words, if a man sleeps with a married woman, he has committed adultery against that woman's husband. However, if a married man has sex with an unmarried woman, there is no crime of adultery.

The reasoning behind that has to do with the laws of inheritance. Sex and marriage were often used to form alliances and transfer wealth. There was a very real fear that an outsider could impregnate your wife and eventually steal your wealth by way of his seed. There was no such concern with knocking up some unmarried girl - if she got pregnant so be it.
 
LOL at the Stone-age retards up in here!

Wake up faggots, it's 2013!

Yeah wake up faggots, it's 2013. Take a gun, go to a school, shoot and kill a bunch of school kids. Don't cut the head of your sister it's a stone-age (uncivilized) thing.
 
Are you saying Americans are fine with adultery? Does Merica approves it?

I don't think any MAN on this earth can even think of living with a girl/wife who is getting fucked by someone else. No one would willing to live with such relations. May be I'm wrong as I'm not clear about American culture.

bro ever heard of open relationships?
 
Putting aside the obviously grotesque thing that this guy did to her sister, it's always interesting to me how in western culture we arguably have the complete opposite extreme as what we would see in Eastern and Middle-Eastern cultures. Here in the west, our culture is basically infested with cheating and extra-marital affairs and many of us have probably become desensitized to these things so much that it almost seems normal. I mean, we even have dating sites for cheaters like ashleymadison.com.

Then you have these Islamic nations that take cheating and extra-marital affairs very seriously. It's not only shunned culturally, but even the government intervenes and stoning to death or hanging isn't uncommon in countries like Iran.

Both extremes are bad in my opinion, but at least in these Eastern and Middle-Eastern cultures, you at least help to maintain the nuclear family by shunning cheating/affairs. I mean, what typically happens when either the man or the wife cheat? Fighting, divorce, family instability and you basically emotionally screw your kids too.

Let me also add that in countries like Iran, getting a divorce is much more difficult than in the states. You typically need the husband's approval and there is no such thing as "no fault divorce" which makes either the husband or wife able to divorce whenever they want for no reason.

Do you see where I'm going with this? The point I'm trying to make is that making cheating wrong as part of the culture, taking extreme measures when cheating occurs, and making divorce harder to obtain all make it so that the nuclear family doesn't dissipate like it did in America, and breaking down the family has horrible outcomes for children.


This isn't entirely true. Plenty of cheating goes in these countries, it just takes different forms. In Iran, it's possible for a man to get a temporary, fixed-duration marriage to have sex with a woman. Also, women still screw around, they just take great care not to get caught, because the consequences are dire. A friend of mine's sister-in-law was hung in Iran after she got caught having a three-way with a couple of her husband's friends, and then her husband had to leave the country to avoid a similar fate. My friend (who is Iranian) says adultery is still pretty common.
 
The difference in good ol 'Merica is if our wife cheats it's the husbands duty to blow her brains out. She's the one who hurt HIM.

It's hard for me to imagine why a brother of the wife would do it. But if i lived in a society where the whole family was shunned, couldn't get jobs cause of it, lost money and respect because of it.. ended up on the streets.. all because a whore cheated.. then maybe I'd flip out like that.. not sure.

But luckily in 'Merica we don't pay for other's crimes and follies nearly as much as some other countries. We are individualists and aren't accountable for the sins of our family members. God bless Merica.

ZZT2c.jpg
 
The fact you added [LIKE A BOSS] to the thread title tells us everything we need to know about you, OP.

Like a Boss????.... Like a fucking murdering idiot more like. Do you still think he'll feel "Like a Boss" when some dude is balls deep in his ass while he eats shit stained nan-breads for 20 years in prison?.
 
The fact you added [LIKE A BOSS] to the thread title tells us everything we need to know about you, OP.

Like a Boss????.... Like a fucking murdering idiot more like. Do you still think he'll feel "Like a Boss" when some dude is balls deep in his ass while he eats shit stained nan-breads for 20 years in prison?.

Congratulations. You are on my ignore list now.
 
Gotta say, I'm not sure if their family unit is something we should look up to. They disown and murder their own sisters for having sex. I don't know, but I'm not sure that's something we should strive for as a society. Just doesn't seem very loving.

I couldn't imagine disowning a family member. Even if one of them turned out to be a serial killer or arsonist, I couldn't just disown them. They're my family.

That's pretty much the other extreme. There's a bit of a contradiction for me though, I don't think society should strive to embrace arsonists or serial killers either, even if they are family.

There was an arson in the UK recently and 5 kids died in the house, are you saying if your family member was responsible you would have anything to do with them?
 
There was an arson in the UK recently and 5 kids died in the house, are you saying if your family member was responsible you would have anything to do with them?

Of course. For example, if one of my nephews was responsible, I'm not going to disown them, and pretend they no longer exist. What kind of uncle, brother, brother-in-law, or son would I be if I did that? As it would affect the entire family.

Obviously I'm not going to say that it was an ok thing to do, and would help ensure they're held responsible for it. But I'd still be there to talk, and help in whatever way they wanted / needed. They're my family, and you don't turn your back on family. Friends come and go, and hell, even spouses come and go at times. Not family though. You only get one.