Maybe you could be a bit more specific, but I'm enraged about the shit I know about, especially the post 9/11 stuff like denying habeas corpus, warrantless wiretapping, etc.
Kind of curious, what specifically were you thinking about?
You're absolutely right about post-9/11 stuff. The things you mentioned are maddening, especially because so many folks are not only okay with the state's intrusion into the lives of their neighbors, but promote it. One look at the various TSA threads reveals as much.
I was thinking about any action for which there are no direct victims. For example, carrying/smoking/dealing weed, drinking and driving, sodomy, riding a bike without a helmet, carrying a loaded firearm, etc.
You're absolutely right about post-9/11 stuff. The things you mentioned are maddening, especially because so many folks are not only okay with the state's intrusion into the lives of their neighbors, but promote it. One look at the various TSA threads reveals as much.
I was thinking about any action for which there are no direct victims. For example, carrying/smoking/dealing weed, drinking and driving, sodomy, riding a bike without a helmet, carrying a loaded firearm, etc.
In other words, do the folks in this thread believe that our rights are granted by charter? Instead of our being able to do what we please, and conducting voluntary transactions with others, we do as we're told.
Natural and legal rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If folks believe this, their outrage strikes me as odd since any action made illegal would, in essence, be revoked by charter. If not, I hope they are equally outraged by every other law that restricts our rights.
And that's what I had hoped to uncover.![]()
To say drinking and driving has no direct victims, well you are right, but .... use your common sense.
So much of the political unrest in the United States could be solved by legalizing marijuana and head-mounted cameras for police officers.
So much of the political unrest in the United States could be solved by legalizing marijuana and head-mounted cameras for police officers.
Tell that to my friend who had his car so mangled you couldn't tell what it was. Oh that's right you can't, because he's dead.
and that is why your position will never garner majority support.
It is not reasonable to allow people to drive drunk. If I know a person is drunk am I supposed to wait until they swerve into oncoming traffic before I stop them? That is ludicrous.
This is the same as saying we should not have safety rules in the workplace, after all if the guy doesn't fall or die then it is ok - right?
It is this laissez faire attitude that allowed child labor to exist.
There are limits that must be placed on society. Proactive limits.
This is also why the passionate that are against government intrusion never make any progress - they push things too far. Take lessons from your liberal counterparts, take things one "right" at a time. That is how we lost our rights, now get them back, but do it correctly, not with extreme positions that will never see the light of day.
As I said before, the system is not broken, the people are. There is no law or right or anything else for that matter that we cannot take back if we are properly organized and if the we can win majority support in the court of public opinion.
no shit.
that was my point, common sense tells you that drinking and driving is a problem.
you missed my sarcasm apparently.
You're absolutely right about post-9/11 stuff. The things you mentioned are maddening, especially because so many folks are not only okay with the state's intrusion into the lives of their neighbors, but promote it. One look at the various TSA threads reveals as much.
I was thinking about any action for which there are no direct victims. For example, carrying/smoking/dealing weed, drinking and driving, sodomy, riding a bike without a helmet, carrying a loaded firearm, etc.
In other words, do the folks in this thread believe that our rights are granted by charter? Instead of our being able to do what we please, and conducting voluntary transactions with others, we do as we're told.
Natural and legal rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If folks believe this, their outrage strikes me as odd since any action made illegal would, in essence, be revoked by charter. If not, I hope they are equally outraged by every other law that restricts our rights.
And that's what I had hoped to uncover.![]()
I think that most people actually believe this at their core, but they've been told so frequently that there should be limitation on their freedom that they have a tough time rationalizing what that actually means. Propaganda is extremely powerful and even the most intelligent people are susceptible to it.