Your constant PC posts on this forum are so predictable it makes you wonder if you're for real or some government drone with a copy paste spreadsheet. I mean, who else would really spend their time posting this dumbass pc bs day in and day out. No way in hell are you succesfull at any kind of business.
LOL, you haven't payed enough attention to my overall body of posts. Sometimes I'm trying to raise a point within a point within a point, and it would take forever to explain them. It's interesting though from a psychological perspective how angry some people get when circle jerks get threatened by a few sentences or just a link on a computer screen.
Is Guerilla PC? In the past, he has told Republicans on here that even if Republicans had complete control for the past 50 years or whatever, that many of the US problems would still be present and that there would also potentially be even more problems in certain areas. (These are far from his exact words, but he made points along those lines.) Now I suppose to someone quickly looking in from the outside, it could have appeared that Guerilla was a staunch Democrat.
What I was partly alluding to was a criticism of government AS A WHOLE, which is a position that doesn't fit into a partisan box, as it applies to both the Bud and Bud Light variety. Some of the Founding Fathers warned more about the FEDERAL government and about
partisan politics.
I'm not going to worry what is or is not "PC", but last I knew it wasn't rather PC to even partially go along with the founding fathers on something. So it's rather hilarious to be called a "government agent" when in a way what I was suggesting is that the feds and state should have even less influence over cities than they already do. I've read enough of UG posts to know that he isn't pushing for this, but what a new person might think is that he was saying that the Detroit town council is so powerful and out of control, that Obama and the feds should get increased power.
Don’t Fall For the Old Divide And Conquer Trick | Washington's Blog -- This article is not about Detroit, but I would say it is at least partly related to another point I was alluding to.
Cherry picking as a means to argue for or against a style of government provides for a shaky argument. Point out government Version A success or failure story, and its easy for government Version B fans to provide a counter example. Debating or engaging in circle jerks, over the topic of which of two groups is more qualified to rule over others, can act as a cover for avoiding the topic of whether it is a good idea in the first place to have one group ruling over others.
No way in hell are you succesfull at any kind of business.
You spelled successful wrong, now go seek out some posts by Suddenly Ass or something to get rid of your butthurt.
