New YouTube ToS for Screwing Up Your Video Sites

Status
Not open for further replies.

fm1234

WF Mega Premium Member
Sep 8, 2007
1,405
63
0
Nice, since I only have a couple of dozen niche video sites that pull content from YT ...

4.D. You agree not to use the Website, including the YouTube Embeddable Player for any commercial use, without the prior written authorization of YouTube. Prohibited commercial uses include any of the following actions taken without YouTube's express approval:
  • sale of access to the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player) on another website;
  • use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player), for the primary purpose of gaining advertising or subscription revenue;
  • the sale of advertising, on the YouTube website or any third-party website, targeted to the content of specific User Submissions or YouTube content;
  • and any use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable player) that YouTube finds, in its sole discretion, to use YouTube's resources or User Submissions with the effect of competing with or displacing the market for YouTube, YouTube content, or its User Submissions. (For more information about prohibited commercial uses, see our FAQ.)


Shitheads.


Frank
 


They are basically covering their own ass and saying that all embedded player code should not be in subscription areas, Makes sense if you ask me. They aren't telling you to remove it off your sites.
 
  • use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player), for the primary purpose of gaining advertising or subscription revenue;
  • the sale of advertising, on the YouTube website or any third-party website, targeted to the content of specific User Submissions or YouTube content

Seems to suggest otherwise. So does this clarification:

We don't want to discourage you from putting the occasional YouTube video in your blog to comment on it or show your readers a video you like, even if you have general purpose ads somewhere on your blog. We will, however, enforce our Terms of Use against, say, a website that does nothing more than aggregate a bunch of embedded YouTube videos and intentionally tries to generate ad revenue from them.

Nothing about subscriptions or memberships there, just non-trivial ad revenue that is driven by traffic driven by the presence of the videos. ie. All of the ad revenue from my niche video sites that use YouTube feeds.


Frank
 
Just tell them that you weren't "intentionally" trying to generate ad revenue. But it is a nice perk to be paid to show their videos ;)
 
Man the majority of the sites have those terms which say you cannot use our videos on your site for commercial use, know what I say.

Fuck Em If They Can't Take A Joke.
 
Yeah, I know, it still sucks because open violation of ToS = all the leverage on their side. Also just generally don't like violating ToS agreements, as I prefer to simply stop using services who obviously don't want my participation (I walked away from $10k a month+ coming in from eBay years ago due to changes in their policy, rather than bother protesting it or trying to sneak around it or whatever.) I'm a big fan of respecting other people's terms, so that I can enforce my own with a stick.


Frank
/blackhats' bitch
 
Who the fuck cares about YouTube's Terms of Service? How many of their uploaders are following the terms of service? Try just about none, 90% of the videos on YouTube violate copyright laws, be it a South Park rip or a song/video mashup.
 
Who the fuck cares about YouTube's Terms of Service? How many of their uploaders are following the terms of service? Try just about none, 90% of the videos on YouTube violate copyright laws, be it a South Park rip or a song/video mashup.

That basically says it all. This is just some legaleze to cover their own asses in the unlikely event that something did come of it. Have I ran out and pulled down all my video blogs? No. Have thousands of other people? Nope. I wouldn't let this keep me up at night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.