When we talk about Tax charged by government on Income of any individual or any company, I would like to prefer Singapore in whole world due to their policy of Tax.
Okay, my mistake. I inferred from this part of your statement:Corruption less likely? I don't believe I said that... I said the money trail would be less obscured.
that you meant money would be going where it shouldn't be. That spells corruption to me. Your argument was unclear.Mainly that would just stop the powers that be from taking their slice of the pie... It's not as easy to hide the money trail that way.
If such a system were to pass, what makes you think that tax revenues would be allocated based off of what consumers purchased, or that we would have any more say into what programs they were used to fund than the current code?Right now all of our income (and many other types of) taxes are thrown into a giant pool and we don't get to have any say over what our gubment spends every penny of that on.
I know it's not guaranteed or anything, but if they taxed consumption like they currently do Gasoline, then you could vote with your dollars in a way towards which programs get funded.
Not perfect, but better. -Assuming they don't try hard to obfuscate where that money goes to just as much, which they likely will. But hey, there's a chance, right?
Okay, my mistake. I inferred from this part of your statement:
that you meant money would be going where it shouldn't be. That spells corruption to me. Your argument was unclear.
If such a system were to pass, what makes you think that tax revenues would be allocated based off of what consumers purchased, or that we would have any more say into what programs they were used to fund than the current code?
Also, to anyone: on what are the Democrats basing the argument that the super-rich pay less taxes than the middle-class? Is it that their income is often shifted into investments and they are speaking about the lower capital gains tax or something else?
The president proposed the rule after Buffett complained he was paying taxes at a lower rate than his secretary. Democrats said he's not the only one -- according to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid's office, 22,000 people who make over $1 million a year pay taxes at a rate of less than 15 percent. According to the IRS, nearly 1,500 households reporting more than $1 million in income paid no federal income taxes in 2009.
That's out of about 236,000 returns for income above $1 million, most of which belong to households paying taxes at a higher rate. And, as would be expected, they contribute a disproportionate share of tax toward federal coffers.
Read more: IRS Data Show Most Millionaires Pay Taxes At Higher Rate Than Middle Class | Fox News
State + Federal. Federal alone is 35%, then you have state tax. He could obviously be structured better but that's the default.
Then on top of that you pay things like road tax, property tax, sales tax, gas tax, utility tax. I pay $15,000+ a year just in property tax. Then the city hits me with $900 per vehicle luxury tax, I have that on 6 of my cars. I even have to pay property tax on campers ($1,300 a year). We have impact fee's that we pay for "impacting" our city with growth.
Once you track that down the list you are paying well over %50 to these greedy robbin hood mofo's
It's too easy to avoid paying taxes, that's why it doesn't matter how much the taxable income percentage is raised, as long as you can take corporate money offshore or implement a thousand other tricks to not directly get paid the right amount.
On a site note, the roots of the USA economic/cultural decline does not rely on taxes.
Totally agree.
Close loop holes. Lower taxes for corps to the point that it becomes unprofitable to avoid them.
When someone says "loophole" they assume the gov't owns all your income. Being allowed to keep your income is not a loophole. Parasite!
seriously?
Bon Jovi gets tax breaks because he keeps bees on his land. Springsteen gets Farm Aid for hiring an organic farmer to work a portion of his land. The top Billionaires in the world (as Buffet points out) only pay around 18%, while any average income person is paying twice that, including his secretary.
Oil companies get subsidies, as well as hundreds of other major industries that just don't need it.
Sophisticated people and companies get out of paying taxes.
You're the kind of soft-commie moron that has no idea what harm his good intentions can bring. ncmedia explained this best up at the top of this thread:Bon Jovi gets tax breaks because he keeps bees on his land. Springsteen gets Farm Aid for hiring an organic farmer to work a portion of his land. The top Billionaires in the world (as Buffet points out) only pay around 18%, while any average income person is paying twice that, including his secretary.
And you want to penalize them more than poor people because they have worked harder to earn that level of sophistication?Sophisticated people and companies get out of paying taxes.
The budget deficit is so large that taxes cannot solve the problem.
Doesn't sound like much of a 'solution' to me. But I'm sure it will benefit whomever is really running things.
Oh well, let's just cross our fingers & hope it's not hyperinflation then.
RP 2012.
Who pays for your firefighters, police, EMT's, roads, sewers, schools, libraries etc? oh yeah, the government.
seriously?
Bon Jovi gets tax breaks because he keeps bees on his land. Springsteen gets Farm Aid for hiring an organic farmer to work a portion of his land. The top Billionaires in the world (as Buffet points out) only pay around 18%, while any average income person is paying twice that, including his secretary.
Oil companies get subsidies, as well as hundreds of other major industries that just don't need it.
Sophisticated people and companies get out of paying taxes.
It's too easy to avoid paying taxes, that's why it doesn't matter how much the taxable income percentage is raised, as long as you can take corporate money offshore or implement a thousand other tricks to not directly get paid the right amount.