PRIME RANKER - huge link diversity - never used before targets - simply unique

Status
Not open for further replies.
atrendyname: the 301 won't be changed. External services are used for it. As long as the services stay up (from my experience as I focus on the biggest providers it's unlikely they delete it) I won't change anything about the 301 redirect - guarantee.

Knockout: got your order, thanks man :)
 


Now ordering! I'm curious about the results and type of links.

Note: My website is experiencing some down time, but this will be solved in a few hours.
 
My second site is up 7 spots now, not as impressive as competition as Cardine's example but a pretty lucrative ecomm niche, lots of big corporate players dominating the top 3 pages. Gonna give it another week or two to make sure there's no backlash and then I'm going to start hitting my high value sites with these.
 
Thanks for the good feedback Grindstone & Cardine!

All review copies have been finished today. Regular orders are about to start being submitted during today and tomorrow. I'll drop a notification in the thread after all full-paid orders are done.

If any questions are left, please don't hesistate to drop me a PM. Otherwise, let's wait for reviews !
 
zingo said:
I am not sure what your offering here needs to be more clear http://www.wickedfire.com/links-seo/111890-new-providers-read-no-mystery-links-posts.html
Click to expand...

I understand your point zingo, and I've sent you a PM already about that.

Let me point out a few facts regarding this issue:

1) I've mentioned some parts of the service in the OP already, but to go closer to what's behind it, imagine links that are mentioned in public indexed chats / discussion groups / social interaction / shares / likes / tweets. The focus is on links which are supposed to be shared between a group of people interacting on social networks / social platforms. As the links are thrown in into a chat for example, they aren't considered spammy as people tend just to post links about a topic in many cases without the intention of purely linkbuilding. That's for avoiding duplicate content issue as well as no written content is used here.

2) I won't mention any platforms / sites / names / whatever for the following reason:

I guess most guys here remember

TRAC tickets - They were used by one guy first on the forum here (at least from what I know), then got copied by one guy who spammed about 80% public available TRAC sites with each order he had. RIP.

Moodle - a small group of guys used it until the copycats found out and copied. RIP.

EZine - everybody used it and copied from each other about interlinking.RIP.

Dochosts - one service brought in dochosts as the very first provider here on WF. Copycats raped it, dochosts getting more and more useless. You gotta think twice how to find new solutions for dochosts, bet you know what I mean Grind! RIP for dochosting.

Wikis - long time ago not that many spammers on the platforms, getting devalued more and more.

3) I explained what kind of links are used. I think considering it's fine for guys to use 'secret sauce' in every service it's kind of unfair not to accept my explanation about this service. I could have gone like selling Web 2.0 properties with secret sauce and have no problems - but wasn't my intention, although it had been smarter I guess.

If anybody has more questions, feel free to ping me up.
 
casinobonus24 said:
I understand your point zingo, and I've sent you a PM already about that.

Let me point out a few facts regarding this issue:

1) I've mentioned some parts of the service in the OP already, but to go closer to what's behind it, imagine links that are mentioned in public indexed chats / discussion groups / social interaction / shares / likes / tweets. The focus is on links which are supposed to be shared between a group of people interacting on social networks / social platforms. As the links are thrown in into a chat for example, they aren't considered spammy as people tend just to post links about a topic in many cases without the intention of purely linkbuilding. That's for avoiding duplicate content issue as well as no written content is used here.

2) I won't mention any platforms / sites / names / whatever for the following reason:

I guess most guys here remember

TRAC tickets - They were used by one guy first on the forum here (at least from what I know), then got copied by one guy who spammed about 80% public available TRAC sites with each order he had. RIP.

Moodle - a small group of guys used it until the copycats found out and copied. RIP.

EZine - everybody used it and copied from each other about interlinking.RIP.

Dochosts - one service brought in dochosts as the very first provider here on WF. Copycats raped it, dochosts getting more and more useless. You gotta think twice how to find new solutions for dochosts, bet you know what I mean Grind! RIP for dochosting.

Wikis - long time ago not that many spammers on the platforms, getting devalued more and more.

3) I explained what kind of links are used. I think considering it's fine for guys to use 'secret sauce' in every service it's kind of unfair not to accept my explanation about this service. I could have gone like selling Web 2.0 properties with secret sauce and have no problems - but wasn't my intention, although it had been smarter I guess.

If anybody has more questions, feel free to ping me up.
Click to expand...

That is somewhat better, and I will let it go at that. I am not allowing services that are just "secret sauce" actually that is played out and would not be acceptable just an FYI.

mjhettwer said:
^ im not sure either, would like to know before i buy for a site and accidentally burn it due to not knowing whats going on...

subscribed.
Click to expand...

This is exactly why I am trying to get more information from these type of service. Trying to improve the buyer experience ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: zdmyn
Sounds fair to me. Got your point as well.

I'll make sure to include some more infos when opening after 10 days a second thread, think that should do the job :)
 
Update: all orders placed until yesterday (Tuesday 15th) have been run. All orders placed from the 16th (today) will be run tomorrow / day after tomorrow.

Results usually start to come in after 3-5 days.
 
I totally get the wanting to avoid copycats thing but there has to be a middle ground like maybe disclosing a full report to a mod. Because when we are looking at "we wont tell you what it does or give a report" whats to stop providers from just taking peoples money and not doing a fucking thing for them? Im not saying YOU are shady but this leaves a ton of room for abuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom