Russia drops the petro dollar.

I'm not a Republican, so there's nothing for me to get defensive about. I'm just trying to help you see that the same alarmists you worry yourself about on the right, exist on the left. The only difference is they use different boogeymen.

And saying that Wickedfire is some kind of bastion of the right wing is just silly. Calling out Obama and his fucking slimeball criminal sidekicks doesn't make people right wing.

I don't think you've read a fucking word I've said thus far. I think you're skimming through posts, and seeing only what you want to see.

  1. Why do you think I'm "worried" about alarmists on the right?
  2. You still haven't made a cogent argument for why you think the left is as fear-based as the right. You haven't provided one single argument. You listed a bunch of "OMGRACISM" type issues the left beats to death, and I explained why these AREN'T primarily based in fear. DId you miss that entire point or are you just trying save face?

If you'd like, I can break the convo down point-by-point to help you understand why you haven't actually made a single good argument that supports your hypothesis that leftist ideology is as fear-based as the right. I can also show you all the baseless assumptions you've made about me thus far.

Repeating the same shit doesn't give your point credibility.
 


IIf you'd like, I can break the convo down point-by-point to help you understand why you haven't actually made a single good argument that supports your hypothesis that leftist ideology is as fear-based as the right. I can also show you all the baseless assumptions you've made about me thus far.

Environmentalism is every bit as fear based as the shit they bitch about on the right. The "War on Women" - yeah no fear based hyperbole there. Out of control cops hunting down innocent black youths? Yup, nothing to trigger fear there. The problem is you're frustrated that I'm not defending the right, just pointing out that the left is just as bad. You want to attack my argument by pointing out what Republicans do, but I give zero fucks because I'm not a Republican and would be happy to see Bush and Obama be cellmates. You keep repeating this meme though about how one side is worse than the other when it comes to creating boogeymen to rally the troops. You're wrong. That's what people in power do, ideology is kinda irrelevant. It's a problem of government, not a problem of political party.

Repeating the same shit doesn't give your point credibility.

You've proven that.
 
How is that tin foil hat? It's a well proven and documented fact that the US provoked Japan to attack them during WWII. This was over 70 years ago, there's no debate on that any more. The US was neutral, then basically put Japan into a cage, and poked it with a stick until it attacked.

Funny how we are selective with history, the US cut off oil to Japan after their aggressive move to continue expanding the war into China. They were also given ample diplomatic opportunities to cut off ties to Germany and Italy and stop the wars that they were wagging. Instead they attacked the United States
 
Because as far as I can see there is none. Just reposts of the mentioned article.

There's lots -- even BloomBerg and BusinessInsider. Ok, they're not as melodramatic as that article, but Russia did recently make some moves:

- They opened a $88 billion USD reserve fund, and began selling it off to prop up the rouble.

- Not sure what the truth here is, because there's too much propaganda floating around. Some outlets say GazProm cut off gas supplies via Ukraine by 60%, while other outlets say it was Ukraine's decision in order to end its reliance on Russia.

- Russia scrapped plans for a pipeline to Bulgaria, and instead is building one to Turkey. Problem is, EU doesn't currently have the infrastructure in place to get that gas from Turkey to Europe. Reasoning for this is because a little while ago the EU made it illegal for Russia to own both, the pipeline and pumping stations on any EU soil. In response, Russia basically said, "fuck it then, your gas will be waiting for you in Turkey -- you figure out how to pick it up".

- Russia recently inked another new deal with China, and is about to ink some more deals in India.

And a bunch of other smaller things. Times are a changing quickly. Let's see what the future holds.
 
- Russia recently inked another new deal with China, and is about to ink some more deals in India.
For China, this contract is a drop in the ocean. For them, it's just one of many moves on preparations for conquering Russian Far East.

With India, it's also not so clear.

Russians have lost even ability and skills of maneuvering in Middle East diplomatic swamp; what to say about China. Chinese can think centuries ahead and surely know how to wait.

All the last year there was the most massive propaganda on Russian media that Great Putin cut the dependance from the West with this China contract; but soon enough it became clear that there are no fixed prices, no fixed volumes, and China openly calls this contract 'protocol of intent'. China obviously ignores this 'mega event' with all their contempt. They don't give it two fucks.

The same with India. Of course Russian media presents all these praising speeches of Indian officials as at face value, but they are no more than usual Eastern wiles. Obviously India is only waiting, as much as all other powerful players in the region, when Russia finally starts falling apart, to grab themselves some tasty parts of Southern republics and satellites.

I've spent a good deal of 2014 traveling in Russia and other ex-USSR countries, the first time for 15 years, and what Putin and his gang have turned this once great country into - just can't be described. Total devastation, despite a nice facade that one can see in Moscow. The level of total exenteration I just can't describe. Yet 90% of the population can't see it. Because they are dumb, didn't learn a history, believe every word from TV, aren't trained to think for themselves, and wait for everything in their lives to be fed by good Tsar/God/KPSS/Putin etc.

What a waste. So fucking painful...


.
 
PJRHceb.gif


dOUHZMe.gif


1stuboy.gif


R3LZZkK.gif


AGC48G2S43UD0031.gif































Cwtjn3j.gif
 
We just don't give a fuck about building made out of glass. You bring it be prepared to take it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXY5Qee1Qbs


Believe in this. The old Bolsheviks were the last ones to fools us.

LOL so pompous, and such a majestic fail.

The video you posted is about a Ukrainian stuntman Mustang Wanted, who painted that Moscow star in the UA flag colors:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-WT6gLKq5I[/ame]


...and got a gift gun from Ukraine's minister of interior.

8PNeRvN.png


Good luck bro.
http://www.wickedfire.com//www.pinterest.com/pin/create/extension/
 
You can't sell a leftist a comparable fear-based product that plays on her political leanings. That's my point.

Billions of dollars a year are generated due to playing to leftist ideals. What are you talking about? "stop climate change, save the world, buy from us, your eco-friendly provider!".

I don't have a dog in this fight, so I could care less, but come on... that shit is everywhere we look.
 
The best thing about fears of economic collapse is you don't really need a "product". The product is the fear itself and you can buy it or sell it, ya see?

I am buying it today. Calls on the VIX, FEb $20 strike, today @ $1.4 . I will keep loading up if I get more chances.
 
I see it, but it's not fear mongering (with the exception of climate change).

It's outrage at perceived social injustic. Their outrage comes from a place of hollow moral authority. Leftists over-identify with victimhood.

so they promote outrage and victimhood... but they aren't fear mongering?

outrage, anger, victimhood, blame... those are all mental states rooted in insecurity & fear.
 
So is gun ownership.

ITT: UG said both sides fear monger. Gimp said the left doesn't fear monger. I pointed out that the left actually does fear monger.

i assume by your comment your are saying the right does too. that was never in question.
 
ITT: UG said both sides fear monger. Gimp said the left doesn't fear monger. I pointed out that the left actually does fear monger.

Nope. Never set the left didn't fear monger. Read my older posts.

so they promote outrage and victimhood... but they aren't fear mongering?

outrage, anger, victimhood, blame... those are all mental states rooted in insecurity & fear.

Outrage, anger, victimhood, and blame aren't necessarily rooted in fear of external threats (the type of fear the "right" embodies - and also the most potent category of fear).

Insecurity? Sure. But I never said the left wasn't insecure. I actually said the opposite earlier. They have low-self esteem like a motherfucker.

You're just saying words, bro. No substance.

Read my posts before you respond to anything else I write.

...

See, what's happening here is people aren't actually reading my words. I claim that most of the right's ideology stems from fear, and everyone loses their shit like I'm attacking the right.

No dipshits. I'm not. In fact, I believe a lot of the fear is justified. But that doesn't change the fact that it's mostly all fear-based in a way leftist ideology simply isn't (with the exception of climate change, which I admitted to in an earlier post).

I'm not just talking out of my ass. My opinion is informed by real fucking research as well as empirical evidence. Where's your data?

Additionally, my hypothesis that the left suffers from low-self esteem seems to be substantiated by research also.

Some key takeaways:

  • Liberals lack personal agency. In other words, they don't have an internal locus of control like conservatives do. While conservatives value responsibility, goal-oriented behavior, and personal accountability, liberals are far more likely to undervalue their own capacity to get shit done and change their environment. They rationalize their situation by blaming systemic injustice, etc. They project their own personal shortcomings onto "disadvantaged" groups, so it makes sense that they want "daddy" government to bail everyone out. This isn't fear-based. Their concern for others isn't based in self-preservationist fear that the right embodies. They genuinely believe people aren't capable of helping themselves, so they sympathize with them more than a conservative would. That's it. They wish someone could bail them out, so they assume others must as well.
  • Liberals and conservatives differ in how they define "fairness." Liberals believe fairness = equality, whereas conservatives believe fairness = equity. These are all contingent upon certain core values, and the study goes into this in greater depth. The implications of this are pretty huge. Why would you value equality over everything else? What makes them think there's intrinsic value in equality? I'll let you do the math (hint: low self-esteem).

There are dozens of other points that could be made based off of the research, but 3 things are clear: Liberals value equality over everything else. 2. They score low on measures of personal agency (i.e. they have an external locus of control) 3. They belief our system is inherently unjust and unfair.

Everything else follows from that. They aren't terrified of external threats so much as their wonky, insecure value system isn't compatible with what society has to offer.

Conservatives/right-wingers, on the other hand, believe our system has worked in the past, and CAN work in the future so long as we revert back to a society that values equity, personal accountability, and transcendent moral standards. Things that threaten these values and beliefs threaten the possibility of a safe, secure future that they ALREADY KNOW WORKS.

Right-wing fear is based on perceived threats to established security, justice, and opportunity.

Left-wing moral outrage/righteous indignation and lust for equality is based on the belief security, justice, and opportunity have always been fundamentally absent from society and must be achieved through "daddy." That's why they consider their insanity "progress." This is a moral crusade - NOT a preservationist defense of things that work well (i.e. fear that external threats will rock the boat or endanger security).

The baselines are completely different for both ends of the political spectrum.

TL;DR: Suck my dick.
 
GimpSpack, you don't believe the "we're all going to die unless we change our ways" isn't fear mongering?
 
GimpSpack, you don't believe the "we're all going to die unless we change our ways" isn't fear mongering?

With regard to climate change and radical environmentalism, sure. I admitted to that in my last post, as well as several posts earlier. You haven't been reading what I said. You're probably basing your opinions of my observation on other members' ignorant "rebuttals."

...

Interestingly enough, you can apply that "We're all going to die" sentence to any number of issues that the right typically worries about, and it almost looks believable (obviously, "death" isn't the primary fear of rightists so much as loss of security/safety is).

"We're all going to die [in an economic disaster] unless the government stops debasing the currency, wasting money on welfare schemes, and plunging our country into debt to offer 'free' services to people who should work for them instead."

"We're all going to die if we continue to let dangerous, violent, filthy immigrants enter our country, leech off of our benefits, threaten our safety, and take over our jobs."

"Without the right to bare arms and defend ourselves, we're all going to die if the government becomes a genocidal, totalitarian killing-machine overnight. 'Those who trade comfort for security deserve neither.'"

"We're all going to die if the government keeps regulating the hell out of small businesses. How are we to provide for ourselves if we can't jump on opportunity? We'll all end up in bread lines if this continues (or worse). "

Obviously, I'm exaggerating these stances a bit, but I'm trying to make the hyperbolic template you gave me work.

Now try to apply that same template to some of the primary leftist concerns:

"We're all going to die if women don't receive equal pay in the workplace."

"We're all going to die if police keep targeting black communities while perpetuating institutional racism via a biased legal system."

"We're all going to die if the rich continue to hoard all the wealth while the 99% are stuck slaving away in shitty jobs."

"We're all going to die if white people don't acknowledge their inherent privilege over every other race."

"We're all going to die unless we allow immigrants to stay in our country and become productive members of society."

Notice how your fear-mongering template doesn't realy apply to most leftist hot-button issues? Why is that?

Hmmm....

Conservatives/right-wingers, on the other hand, believe our system has worked in the past, and CAN work in the future so long as we revert back to a society that values equity, personal accountability, and transcendent moral standards. Things that threaten these values and beliefs threaten the possibility of a safe, secure future that they ALREADY KNOW WORKS.

Right-wing fear is based on perceived threats to established security, justice, and opportunity.

Left-wing moral outrage/righteous indignation and lust for equality is based on the belief security, justice, and opportunity have always been fundamentally absent from society and must be achieved through "daddy." That's why they consider their insanity "progress." This is a moral crusade - NOT a preservationist defense of things that work well (i.e. fear that external threats will rock the boat or endanger security).