While we are on this body language train
https://face.paulekman.com/face/default.aspx
https://www.humintell.com/advancedmicroexpressiontraining/
Watched first 15 minutes and couldn't stand it anymore. Most of this is heavy speculation and blunt rationalization.
Says JoseArmando, the body language expert?
As humans we have a very strong tendency to look for cause and effect relationship between events. In this case, you have body language experts doing what's called "mind reading". They have no idea what's going in people's heads, yet they throw around statements like "he's nervous"/"trying to assert dominance" and then looking for body language that supports their assumption.
It would only be valid if somehow they got the data what was really going on minds of those people which they obviously don't have.
Also the 7% rule was as far as I'm concerned debunked as bad science and considering this documentary uses it as opening statement says a lot about the validity of it.
Neurolinguistic Programming
Psychology
Body Language
By far some of the most interesting topics I've learn about in the past 5-6 years.
As humans we have a very strong tendency to look for cause and effect relationship between events. In this case, you have body language experts doing what's called "mind reading". They have no idea what's going in people's heads, yet they throw around statements like "he's nervous"/"trying to assert dominance" and then looking for body language that supports their assumption.
It would only be valid if somehow they got the data what was really going on minds of those people which they obviously don't have.
Also the 7% rule was as far as I'm concerned debunked as bad science and considering this documentary uses it as opening statement says a lot about the validity of it.
As humans we have a very strong tendency to look for cause and effect relationship between events. In this case, you have body language experts doing what's called "mind reading". They have no idea what's going in people's heads, yet they throw around statements like "he's nervous"/"trying to assert dominance" and then looking for body language that supports their assumption.
It would only be valid if somehow they got the data what was really going on minds of those people which they obviously don't have.
Also the 7% rule was as far as I'm concerned debunked as bad science and considering this documentary uses it as opening statement says a lot about the validity of it.
You'll love this guy then. Dave Dobson is the real deal, funny fucking guy too. I highly recommend any of his beach tapes or fun shop recordings. He literally blown my mind. He talks a lot about "other than conscious communication" he also developed it.
INTERVIEW OF DAVE DOBSON 3 - YouTube