OK, here's my 2 cents:
While it is very important for potential buyers to have reviews to bank on before purchasing someone's services, don't you think it is equally important to protect the interests of the the service providers?
Agreed, the power lies with the guys with the cash in hand certainly. BUT, shouldn't there be some sort of balance to keep bad/harassing buyers in line? Seems kinda lop-sided ATM.
Reviews of Buyers done by other providers can help providers determine whether they want to do business with a certain client and if yes, what should they expect.
Maybe we should have something along the lines of the current reviews being published for providers, for example, buyers can be reviewed on:
Clarity of Instructions/Goal of assignment
Details Provided
Communication/Availability to provide clarifications
Professionalism
Payment Speed/Problems (something along those lines)
Your thoughts?
While it is very important for potential buyers to have reviews to bank on before purchasing someone's services, don't you think it is equally important to protect the interests of the the service providers?
Agreed, the power lies with the guys with the cash in hand certainly. BUT, shouldn't there be some sort of balance to keep bad/harassing buyers in line? Seems kinda lop-sided ATM.
Reviews of Buyers done by other providers can help providers determine whether they want to do business with a certain client and if yes, what should they expect.
Maybe we should have something along the lines of the current reviews being published for providers, for example, buyers can be reviewed on:
Clarity of Instructions/Goal of assignment
Details Provided
Communication/Availability to provide clarifications
Professionalism
Payment Speed/Problems (something along those lines)
Your thoughts?