Slow Mobile Sites Soon to Impact Search Rank

Fatbat

Advertise Here
May 10, 2008
6,988
149
63
Costa del Sol, Spain
www.linkedin.com
Slow Mobile Sites Soon to Impact Search Rank | Zoompf

So, not only is it important to have a mobile friendly flexible/adaptive/responsive mobile site (you're losing traffic and sales if you don't because Google already looks to see if your site is mobile friendly) it's also important that you're not serving up a ridiculously huge site to mobile users.

tl:dr

Reduce your file sizes and make as few HTTP requests as possible folks.
 


I used to think being a developer was a pain in the ass, always having to keep up with the latest technology and trends. However, being a designer must be far worse. At least the stuff we develop generally lasts for more than a year. Couldn't imagine having to constantly keep up with the amount of constant changes you guys have to. What an absolute pain in the ass that would be.
 
It seems kind of odd with access speeds of 3G 4G being the norm for mobile 100mbps fibre becoming available at home, google wants minimalistic sites.

Guess craigslist had it right all this time. plain text on white background.
 
It seems kind of odd with access speeds of 3G 4G being the norm for mobile 100mbps fibre becoming available at home, google wants minimalistic sites.

Guess craigslist had it right all this time. plain text on white background.

it doesnt have to be plain text on a white background. It's about optimizing images, and code. It is about using best practices so the user can get a fast responsive experiance no matter what the device. You can have a rich interactive and fast site.
 
What's this I hear? Mobile? RWD?

rExMqyK.jpg
 
I used to think being a developer was a pain in the ass, always having to keep up with the latest technology and trends. However, being a designer must be far worse. At least the stuff we develop generally lasts for more than a year. Couldn't imagine having to constantly keep up with the amount of constant changes you guys have to. What an absolute pain in the ass that would be.

Nothing will ever be a bigger pain in the ass than internet explorer.
 
That's why they've had the Mobile option in the Page Speed Insights tool for a while now. They're pretty good about hinting which directions they're heading in for the most part.
 
it doesnt have to be plain text on a white background. It's about optimizing images, and code. It is about using best practices so the user can get a fast responsive experiance no matter what the device. You can have a rich interactive and fast site.

Was your post sponsored by Cutts?
 
It's all about that mito tag site speed bro...

This one was fairly obvious move actually. In fact, I think it's more important for your site speed to be as fast as possible with mobile, since people/mobile providers (Look at you AT&T) still have shitty slow connections. It'll teach people to use less clunky code and "reduce to a minimum all that is un-necessary."​
 
It seems kind of odd with access speeds of 3G 4G being the norm for mobile 100mbps fibre becoming available at home, google wants minimalistic sites.

Guess craigslist had it right all this time. plain text on white background.

Not everyone in the world has blistering speeds and unlimited bandwidth, especially on mobile. If you're site is huge, odds are you're costing someone looking at it money.
 
I'm curious if any of you guys have started developing with TV in mind? I would imagine speed wouldn't be as big a deal, but still a concern
 
I'm curious if any of you guys have started developing with TV in mind? I would imagine speed wouldn't be as big a deal, but still a concern

The only difference I see with TV is it has a lower resolution than computer monitors. The delivery system is in place, just got to figure out the TV's browser standards. If they're in-line with current web standards there shouldn't be a big problem.

But I don't see the internet going to TV with it's current Mouse + Keyboard setup. We'd need more devices like LeapMotion and Xbox 180 to control the experience, since most people aren't 12 inches away from their TV like they are with a computer monitor/laptop.​
 
That's why they've had the Mobile option in the Page Speed Insights tool for a while now. They're pretty good about hinting which directions they're heading in for the most part.

Which is why I've been testing sites that I build with mobile devices for a few years now, and why RWD & other device consideration is a standard part of my design flow from the start, even when a client doesn't understand it at first.

It's all about that mito tag site speed bro...

This one was fairly obvious move actually. In fact, I think it's more important for your site speed to be as fast as possible with mobile, since people/mobile providers (Look at you AT&T) still have shitty slow connections. It'll teach people to use less clunky code and "reduce to a minimum all that is un-necessary."​

Indeed - here in the UK people that I know adopted mobile internet a long time ago when networks were slow and displays tiny. Now nearly everyone (apart from the more remote users) have fast internet connections on their mobile devices, and are increasingly using them as one their main portals to the web. This figure is just increasing all the time and speed is critical not just to SERP results but to overall effectiveness.

It really won't be long before you notice a new breed of sites popping up that make intelligent use of a combination of geo data (true* local search), device profile modelling, user data from inter-site connections and more... This, my friends, is the way forward and how we can really target a prospect with exactly what they "want", can afford, and are likely to buy.

I shall not use this opportunity to spread my evil word of Mobile SEO or I shall get shot down in flames by the disbelievers here** apart from to say I don't think it will be too long before 'mobile device' web access is more commonplace than desktop. Also - I honestly don't know if any of you are building these sites yourselves already, in which case I'm just saying stuff you already know, but you might want to start thinking about flexible displays how to design for those soon.

I might sound like a pompous stuck up twat, but trust me on this: Mobile devices are the now and the future.




*the surrounding hundred yards of the user in metropolitan areas.

**plus I'm really learning a lot about AM from you chaps (which I find fascinating) and don't want to appear like a snob - I'm eternally grateful!
 
The only difference I see with TV is it has a lower resolution than computer monitors. The delivery system is in place, just got to figure out the TV's browser standards. If they're in-line with current web standards there shouldn't be a big problem.

But I don't see the internet going to TV with it's current Mouse + Keyboard setup. We'd need more devices like LeapMotion and Xbox 180 to control the experience, since most people aren't 12 inches away from their TV like they are with a computer monitor/laptop.​

Agreed. I see it being controlled with remotes, tablets, phones. I think it will be in closed systems like Netflix or a roku type setting which could limit the potential. With that in mind tv is going to be the next big boom for the Internet but that's a whole other discussion
 
With that in mind tv is going to be the next big boom for the Internet but that's a whole other discussion

I wouldn't go that far... Microsoft seems to thing so with this Xbox 180, but I'm not inclined that's the future. I think more Mobile is the future and less reliance on TV.

I remember I went a whole 3 years without my TV even working. I didn't miss much. The TV itself might be come extinct - that's a theory I'm starting to work on.

Really the only thing I see TVs used for are playing video games like Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo. Everything else can be done with a computer now, and even mobile/tablet devices.

As games continue to evolve on mobile devices and the barrier to entry is lowered for mobile games, Xbox, PS3/4, and Nintendo can become completely extinct, and then... well what will we need a TV for?

Maybe for Movie night with the family/date, watch the "Big Game" with your friends or something where a shared experience is needed. So yeah, for social occasions it will still be around and not completely dead.

As most of it's old functionalities go online to the computer/mobile, it's has less and less power.​
 
I wouldn't go that far... Microsoft seems to thing so with this Xbox 180, but I'm not inclined that's the future. I think more Mobile is the future and less reliance on TV.

I remember I went a whole 3 years without my TV even working. I didn't miss much. The TV itself might be come extinct - that's a theory I'm starting to work on.

Really the only thing I see TVs used for are playing video games like Xbox, Playstation, and Nintendo. Everything else can be done with a computer now, and even mobile/tablet devices.

As games continue to evolve on mobile devices and the barrier to entry is lowered for mobile games, Xbox, PS3/4, and Nintendo can become completely extinct, and then... well what will we need a TV for?

Maybe for Movie night with the family/date, watch the "Big Game" with your friends or something where a shared experience is needed. So yeah, for social occasions it will still be around and not completely dead.

As most of it's old functionalities go online to the computer/mobile, it's has less and less power.​

Spoken like a true entraprauneral bachlor.

The tv is'nt going anywhere anytime soon. The current distribution of TV programing will die a painful death over the next 10 years; people flopping their fat ass on the couch in front of a tv is here to stay. Who is going to huddle around a tablet or pc to watch the big game? I cant stand watching a movie on my pc (24" screen)or a tablet let alone a phone. Sure I can watch youtube video's all day on one of those devices; but to put it on the big screen?

As to gaming that is only but a small fraction of the TV market; gaming consoles could become extinct tommorrow and have little impact on the tv market. No TV is going to have tremendous growth opportunities in the comming decade. The cable companies and traditional media companies will go kicking and screaming but it is going to evolve. I dont know if TV will have a meaningful impact on browsing; streaming content to tv's is set to explode.
 
Spoken like a true entraprauneral bachlor.

The tv is'nt going anywhere anytime soon. The current distribution of TV programing will die a painful death over the next 10 years; people flopping their fat ass on the couch in front of a tv is here to stay. Who is going to huddle around a tablet or pc to watch the big game? I cant stand watching a movie on my pc (24" screen)or a tablet let alone a phone. Sure I can watch youtube video's all day on one of those devices; but to put it on the big screen?

As to gaming that is only but a small fraction of the TV market; gaming consoles could become extinct tommorrow and have little impact on the tv market. No TV is going to have tremendous growth opportunities in the comming decade. The cable companies and traditional media companies will go kicking and screaming but it is going to evolve. I dont know if TV will have a meaningful impact on browsing; streaming content to tv's is set to explode.

True. I've never watched a movie in anything but my TV. That social aspect of movies, "Big Games", and gaming is what will keep it around. But I don't see it entering the internet browsing marketing without some new interface that takes it to the next level.

P.S. Extra indention for the tag, LOL​
 
I think if marketers are smart they will try to get the user to watch commercials again by introducing interactivity with the tablet or phone somehow. That might be the next place it will go, the TV will "talk" to your phone. Marketers have to find a way to get people off of facebook while watching TV and that is to make it interactive IMO.

How, dunno.