Surprise - Justice Department will not file charges against Goldman Sachs

Unarmed Gunman

Medium Pimpin'
May 2, 2007
7,335
287
0
The D
www.googlehammer.com
[FONT=&quot]After a yearlong investigation, the Justice Department said Thursday that it won't bring charges against Goldman Sachs Group or any of its employees for financial fraud related to the mortgage crisis.

[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]In a statement, the Justice Department said "the burden of proof" couldn't be met to prosecute Goldman criminally based on claims made in an extensive report prepared by a U.S. Senate panel that investigated the financial crisis.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]"Based on the law and evidence as they exist at this time, there is not a viable basis to bring a criminal prosecution with respect to Goldman Sachs or its employees in regard to the allegations set forth in the report," the statement read.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The Justice Department reserved the right to bring charges in the future if new evidence emerges.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In a statement Thursday, Goldman said: "We are pleased that this matter is behind us."[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In April 2011, the U.S. Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations published a scathing report on the financial crisis, highlighting Goldman as a culprit. Lawmakers accused the firm of breeding a greedy culture and running conflict-ridden businesses, and they said Goldman put its own interest ahead of clients.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Sen. Carl Levin, D., Mich., chairman of the Senate's subcommittee, said Goldman executives lied to Congress about the firm's bets against the housing market. The accusation triggered a Justice Department probe of possible perjury.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]A spokeswoman for Mr. Levin's office didn't respond to a request for comment Thursday.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The report concluded that even as securities firms flooded the market with securitized mortgages and advised clients to buy them, firms privately used words like "crap" and "flying pig" to describe the financial instruments. The department's probe was launched when Goldman's reputation already had been battered by civil-fraud charges filed against the New York company by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC accused Goldman of fraud related to a mortgage-bond deal called Abacus 2007-AC1.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Goldman was accused of failing to inform investors that hedge-fund firm Paulson & Co. had helped choose underlying securities in the deal and was betting against it.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Goldman agreed to pay $550 million to end the SEC's civil-fraud suit. The company said marketing materials for the Abacus deal contained "incomplete information."[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The announcement comes amid criticism of the Justice Department from some lawmakers for what they contend are disappointing results in efforts to bring criminal cases against firms and individuals for crisis-related wrongdoing.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Justice Department officials have defended the agency's track record, and some legal experts have noted the difficulty of targeting specific individuals and firms given the enormity of the financial crisis.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In the statement Thursday, the Justice Department said prosecuting financial fraud and "protecting the integrity of our banking system" is and will continue to be the department's "top priority."[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The criminal investigation was led by the New York field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, according to a person familiar with the matter.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The probe also included the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program.[/FONT]
Source: U.S. Won't Pursue Goldman Charges - WSJ.com


In an odd coincidence, Goldman Sachs was the second largest campaign contributors to Obama in 2008. In fact, they gave far more money to Obama than all of the other candidates combined - so maybe they knew something ahead of time?

Now they're giving all of their money to Romney...


sWxj3.png
 


that would be like putting your main weed source in jail for selling weed...

i expect campaign contributions will be bitchin these elections! USA USA!
 
So then why did you make this thread? Do you think they did something illegal? If so, what?

Um...

But they will file charges against MegaUpload. Glad they got their priorities right!

By the way, they acknowledged wrongdoing already on several occasions and even just settled a class action lawsuit related to the mortgage meltdown.

Also, I made the thread because I fucking felt like it. Problem?
 
Surprise - I decided to make a ham sandwich just now because I'm hungry.

Do your own research if you really want to know, you are sitting in front of a computer.

It's pretty well known GS is an organization that doesn't give a fuck what is illegal,immoral,amoral when it comes to making money. Pretty much a root cause of the corruption of the political system - throwing money around to open,create, bastardized markets so they can spit out billions.

Here, I'm feeling nice, this should be a good starter for you.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html?_r=1

I work in the industry, true story.
 
Do your own research if you really want to know, you are sitting in front of a computer.

It's pretty well known GS is an organization that doesn't give a fuck what is illegal,immoral,amoral when it comes to making money. Pretty much a root cause of the corruption of the political system - throwing money around to open,create, bastardized markets so they can spit out billions.

Here, I'm feeling nice, this should be a good starter for you.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html?_r=1

I work in the industry, true story.

Having a greedy corporate culture is not illegal. Why don't you tell me something that they did that was illegal that they haven't already admitted/settled?

I'm not the one claiming or implying that justice wasn't served. So you do the research.
 
I approve of this thread.

Goldman Sachs is a fucking cancer on Western Civilization. Go read the Big Short by Michael Lewis if you don't have a clue.
 
Having a greedy corporate culture is not illegal. Why don't you tell me something that they did that was illegal that they haven't already admitted/settled?

I'm not the one claiming or implying that justice wasn't served. So you do the research.


Rolling Stone did great investigative works on those assholes:

The People vs. Goldman Sachs | Politics News | Rolling Stone


Really, I gotta leave the computer, I'm starting to foam at the mouth. Eveybody hates Goldman Sachs, they fuck over everybody, including everybody else in the securities industry.
 
Let's just be honest, no da is smart enough (didn't pass basic calc with more than a C+) to actually be able to understand the financial markets enough to prosecute G&S
 
Rolling Stone did great investigative works on those assholes:

The People vs. Goldman Sachs | Politics News | Rolling Stone


Really, I gotta leave the computer, I'm starting to foam at the mouth. Eveybody hates Goldman Sachs, they fuck over everybody, including everybody else in the securities industry.

Ok, so it looks like they misrepresented their opinions to congress. I don't really see how that could be proven. Isn't contempt of congress more for things where people are clearing lying about facts?

Why is it a problem that they moved from being long mortgages to massively short? They were selling to other sophisticated wall street firms and clients. The other firms should have better understood the risks.

They have teams of lawyers to ensure they are acting within the law.