District 9 or Zombieland should have won!![]()
I'm a vet and I loved the movie...
I'm a little nit picky about some of the details, like the fact they reference Youtube yet mention Camp Liberty had recently had its name changed to Camp Victory, which happened before I got there in '04... And a lot of other nit picky shit that people who weren't there wouldn't give a shit about.
But overall it's my favorite movie about OIF. It's a fairly realistic, and does an awesome job of portraying the "rush" and the adrenaline addiction people experience in combat.
I will never go back over there. But you'll never feel as alive as you do when mortar shrapnel misses you by a few feet.
I agree, skip that clip if you haven't seen it. It surprised me, I'm pretty cynical about war movies about Iraq, but they did a good job with Hurt Locker.
One last note, for those of you who've seen it, a lot of that shit just wouldn't happen in real life. But it's fiction, not a documentary, and as a fictional portrayal it's pretty good.
-Scott
District 9 or Zombieland should have won!![]()
what really got me excited is "The Pacific" is starting next sunday on HBO. FUCK YEAH!!!
People you do realize "The Hurt Locker" did only $10 million in profit, while "Avatar" made over $230 million? One is a failure compared to the other.
Avatar should of won, just based on the above numbers.
Good thing it wasn't a documentary. It wasn't meant to show the lives of EOD, that just happened to be the unit the screenwriter was embedded with. The story could have been told with any number of different units, but I think EOD was a wise choice. This isn't some "based on a true story" type movie. It's taking you inside the head of those who's true love is war itself. Most people look at the first two hours of the movie as being what the core of the movie was about. But it's not. The entire movie is building up the the last 15 minutes. When he's not in Iraq, but stateside. That was what the movie was about. Showing a man who doesn't feel comfortable outside of a war zone. Yes, he doesn't resemble typical OD soldiers, he's not supposed to.The only thing I didn't care for in the movie was what an arrogant fool the lead character was. None of the guys I met working OD were like that, quite the opposite. They were all about staying safe and not unecessarily endangering anyone including themselves. Ordnance guys were the most cautious and calm guys I ever met in uniform, hands down.
Good thing it wasn't a documentary. It wasn't meant to show the lives of EOD, that just happened to be the unit the screenwriter was embedded with. The story could have been told with any number of different units, but I think EOD was a wise choice. This isn't some "based on a true story" type movie. It's taking you inside the head of those who's true love is war itself. Most people look at the first two hours of the movie as being what the core of the movie was about. But it's not. The entire movie is building up the the last 15 minutes. When he's not in Iraq, but stateside. That was what the movie was about. Showing a man who doesn't feel comfortable outside of a war zone. Yes, he doesn't resemble typical OD soldiers, he's not supposed to.
Actually, there's many military members who were initially working with the film's producers, but severed ties because they felt she wasn't being accurate to true life.
Virtually every person who's actually done that kind of work says she portrayed them in an untrue light, as some type of cowboys looking for an adrenaline rush, to the point where they talk about openly laughing at her depictions of them.
There's a reason the military stopped working with her, just like there's a reason she won those awards; the whole thing's political. She's a typical Hollywood monkey, and she danced just like they wanted her to so she could take her shiny bananas home and reaffirm her deluded preconceptions to herself.