Too Provocative, Give Me A Fucking Break, I've Seen More At The Age Of 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Aequitas

New member
Feb 19, 2007
2,954
73
0
Canada
So here are a few images which have been disapproved by the facebook team because they are too provocative to be on a dating ad for "Straight, Single, Males Aged 18 to 23".

1.png


Ok sure I can see there tight asses disapproving the above one.

2.png


But this one are you serious?

3.png


Or how about this one.

4.png


No Not a porn star.

I seriously hope Keith from FaceBook and WickedFire is serious about giving me a phone call tomorrow because this is just getting down right stupid, the only one they approved was this one.

5.png


So this means that anything other then a face for a dating ad is absolutely not allowed by facebook.

I mean seriously now there are limits to the stupidity of the rules, especially when somehow someone somewhere got these ads approved, which show way more then my images above.

6.png


You cannot tell me some of these images are not more Provocative then the ones I was trying to get approved.

The only other thing I can think of as to why they would disapprove me is because I was using the same ad text and ad copy (just a different image) as the one that got approved (But even then they did not say that they said that the issue was the provocative images.

So the one dating offer I waited and was approved I made similar ads only changing up the images, I did this so I can try to split test which image results in a better CTR and hopefully a better conversion on the other end.

I'm now almost tempted to use the images in my signature as my next attempt just because I'm so flipping pissed off right now.

/rant.
 


Aequitas said:
haha this isn't anywhere near NSFW,

Unless there is something wrong with me personally........maybe too much work with porn sites.
Click to expand...

I don't know what you're talking about, I definitely see some provocative pictures in need of a nsfw tag.

Example:
4.png


I don't know about you, but to me it looks like she is about to take off her hat. If she's willing to take off the hat, she's probably willing to take off other things too.

WF is out of control right now.
 
subigo said:
I don't know what you're talking about, I definitely see some provocative pictures in need of a nsfw tag.

Example:
4.png


I don't know about you, but to me it looks like she is about to take off her hat. If she's willing to take off the hat, she's probably willing to take off other things too.

WF is out of control right now.
Click to expand...

haha I can see your point, by the looks of it her hair just might get caught up in her arm strap and rip off her whole top in which case the hat would fly off in the wind as well.

Oh and this one here
1.png


Shows a little bit of a white thong strap so in which case the white background might influence it to come off as well......She is too hot to be on facebook anyway, she should be under my covers.
 
chatmasta said:
I'm trying to figure out why facebook doesn't like money. It's quite strange.
Click to expand...

Yeah I've been trying to figure it out for awhile now, it appears to be an anomaly in time and space, now if I can just push enough quantum physics offers through the process it might be able to correct itself.
 
I got a pretty provocative ad approved for dating and it's getting a 0.48% ctr, with $0.02/click in Canada. Sadly the dating offer I direct linked to converts like shit, and only gives me a 20-30% ROI. And of course I cant get any other ad with the same image approved again.
 
Ive had the same problems ads never get though. The answer I always hear is to resubmit every few hours until one guy lets it though. Its a big pain in the ass.
 
It's called a first-mover advantage. Many of us got ads through at an earlier stage when policies were more relaxed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom