Town requires gun ownership, no murders in 25 years

BlokBlok

ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Sep 17, 2010
2,231
79
48
25 years murder-free in 'Gun Town USA'

As the nation debates whether more guns or fewer can prevent tragedies like the Virginia Tech Massacre, a notable anniversary passed last month in a Georgia town that witnessed a dramatic plunge in crime and violence after mandating residents to own firearms.

In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of "Wild West" showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting – as a victim, attacker or defender.

The crime rate initially plummeted for several years after the passage of the ordinance, with the 2005 per capita crime rate actually significantly lower than it was in 1981, the year before passage of the law.

Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189.

By comparison, the population of Morton Grove, the first city in Illinois to adopt a gun ban for anyone other than police officers, has actually dropped slightly and stands at 22,202, according to 2005 statistics. More significantly, perhaps, the city's crime rate increased by 15.7 percent immediately after the gun ban, even though the overall crime rate in Cook County rose only 3 percent. Today, by comparison, the township's crime rate stands at 2,268 per 100,000.

This was not what some predicted.

In a column titled "Gun Town USA," Art Buchwald suggested Kennesaw would soon become a place where routine disagreements between neighbors would be settled in shootouts. The Washington Post mocked Kennesaw as "the brave little city … soon to be pistol-packing capital of the world." Phil Donahue invited the mayor on his show.

Reuters, the European news service, today revisited the Kennesaw controversy following the Virginia Tech Massacre.

Police Lt. Craig Graydon said: "When the Kennesaw law was passed in 1982 there was a substantial drop in crime … and we have maintained a really low crime rate since then. We are sure it is one of the lowest (crime) towns in the metro area." Kennesaw is just north of Atlanta.

The Reuters story went on to report: "Since the Virginia Tech shootings, some conservative U.S. talk show hosts have rejected attempts to link the massacre to the availability of guns, arguing that had students been allowed to carry weapons on campus someone might have been able to shoot the killer."

Virginia Tech, like many of the nation's schools and college campuses, is a so-called "gun-free zone," which Second Amendment supporters say invites gun violence – especially from disturbed individuals seeking to kill as many victims as possible.

Cho Seung-Hui murdered 32 and wounded another 15 before turning his gun on himself.

I <3 guns
 


They said he was Chinese and there was a conspiracy to put it down on Koreans instead.
 
Good job Kennesaw for having the cajones to enact a law like that. Even better to see that it succeeded in quelling violent crimes in their city.
 
It also makes my heart go pitter patter knowing Hellblazer will get an erection reading this.
 
It also makes my heart go pitter patter knowing Hellblazer will get an erection reading this.
What makes you think that? I've never seen him get excited about 2nd amendment issues. Where's the hysterical hellblazer thread about the whole ATF "Fast and Furious" fiasco the current administration is trying to stonewall and sweep under the rug? Doesn't he live in one of the less gun-friendly states like MA or something?

As for Kennesaw, good for them, but I'm not a fan of them making it a requirement. Yeah, I know, I'm probably as enthusiastic about guns as anyone here, carry one daily, and own more than most of you, but again, I don't need the town telling me what to purchase. Of course, it's unenforceable, so it really doesn't make a big difference.

On the flipside, all those little Chicago suburbs banning handgun ownership suck ass. There was a case of one (Willmette?) where a restaurant owner, Hale Demar, shot an intruder, and he was in violation of the ban in that "village". Guy breaks into his house with kids there, and the homeowner is the one who is taking heat for shooting him. I just don't understand how that makes any sense to people at all.
Thank the court system for the Heller and McDonald decisions, along with stronger castle laws in more states, so crap like that will hopefully become a lot less likely.
 
You can find the same crime rate (or better) in cities of similar size with no gun requirement. You can find lower crime rates in countries which outlaw guns. Kennesaw = nothing special unless you have an agenda to push.
 
They said he was Chinese and there was a conspiracy to
3.jpg
4.jpg

6.jpg
 
It's not really news - the Swiss have pretty much compulsory assault rifle ownership, and their crime is very low (unless you count aiding and abetting tax evasion ;) )


Violent crime levels have more to do with gap in living standards between rich & poor, drug laws, level of education and culture than gun ownership. Firearms-related crime in the UK has risen over the past 15 years, despite stupidly tight regulations on handguns being introduced in 1996 (tabloid-driven kneejerk legislation in the wake of the Dunblane massacre).

Switzerland is the sort of place where you'll get a severe telling off from passersby for crossing the road in the wrong place. I'd imagine that small town in Georgia probably has a similar level of peer pressure keeping people in line.

Gun control is one of those stupid ideological things that politicians like to argue about, because it's simpler to understand than the real causes of crime.
 
I fucking live in Switzerland and you could not be further off the mark re: "compulsory gun ownership"

::emp::
 
I've been there, I used to work out/hike on the mountain (Kennesaw) , which has a civil war history, they tried to hold them off there )damn yankees), probably the genesis for this law, believe it or not, the civil war loss/resentment factor is in there somewhere...
 
The racial makeup of the city was 81.97% White, 1.90% Black, 5.22% Native American, 2.91% Asian, 0.02% Pacific Islander, 2.54% from other races, and 2.45% from two or more races.

Only 1.9% black...

/justsaying

So what your saying is 15.4% (total minority population)of the population makes up the majority of crime in that town. So following the 80/20 rule (it works perfect here) 20% of the people (15% minority's + 5% white tweekers) make up 80% of the crime.

/justsaying
 
Firearms-related crime in the UK has risen over the past 15 years, despite stupidly tight regulations on handguns being introduced in 1996 (tabloid-driven kneejerk legislation in the wake of the Dunblane massacre).
To be fair though, most of the firearms have been shotguns, which are easy to get licensed for. (locked cabinet secured to a brick wall, no history of armed robberies, and no jailtime longer than 4 years)

Plus a justifiable reason why you want one. (i.e. Clay pigeon shooting)