UK Has Highest Violent Crime Rate in World - Great Job Gun Control

Any bets on a name for the new organization that's coming to the US? How about maybe SSA? School Security Agency? Maybe SPF? School Protection Force?

It'll be good. They'll get used to armed guards wandering around everywhere keeping an eye on things. Drill it into them at an early age, that's the way to do 'er!
 


Any bets on a name for the new organization that's coming to the US? How about maybe SSA? School Security Agency? Maybe SPF? School Protection Force?

It'll be good. The kids can get groped when they goto school, just to get them ready for adulthood, when they get groped by the TSA upon boarding a plane. All the while, they'll get used to armed guards wandering around everywhere keeping an eye on things. Drill it into them at an early age, that's the way to do 'er!

Sucks that I think you're probably right. It's a helpless feeling.

Just for clarification, I'm 100% for gun rights.

I'm 100% against a police state.
 
Something tells me that "Maps of World- We do magic to Maps" is not the most trustworthy source for this information. Especially because in the first paragraph they say yet the stat for America is 11,877,218. That's 118 crimes per person. Don't believe everything you read on the internet, especially when there's 30 fucking ads plastered on the site.

Ding Ding we have a winner.

ed_lover%2800-cmon-son-med%29.jpg


Violent Crime Rates per 100,000 population in 2010.

Assault

  • 664 (UK: England and Wales)
  • 250.9 (United States)
Robbery

  • 137.0 (UK: England and Wales)
  • 115.3 (United States)

Source:

United Nations

http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/CTS12_Assault.xls
http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/CTS12_Robbery.xls
 
We're British we're violent and we fight. Yanks have guns and kill. Simple. We like a good old scrap and we're naturally violent, you pull a gun and end a life.

I think the fact that our murder rate is 3 times lower speaks volumes. But, oh yeah, lets go on stats that make it appear 'Merica is safer. Yeah right.

You aren't taught by birth that the way to solve your problems is through killing. American tradition is that when we have a disagreement with another nation, we got to war with them.

Killing and death is part of the american psychology. Brits like to have a fistfight and then spend the rest of the evening tugging each other's dicks.

I wish I had something specific by Malcolm Gladwell on this issue, because he's a really smart guy who gets and explains these sorts of social dynamics better than most people.
 
ITT: Butt-hurt Britfags whose country has been taken over by Muslims. Congratulations!

BBC News - Growing use of Sharia by UK Muslims

Mea

Not that one again... Who cares if someone has an alternative dispute resolution service based on their religion? Jewish courts have existed for several hundred years.

Neither of them have any sentencing or other powers whatsoever. If they'd rather sort out their civil disputes and problems with a voluntary private agreement and private court... Cool.
 
ed_lover%2800-cmon-son-med%29.jpg


Violent Crime Rates per 100,000 population in 2010.

Assault

  • 664 (UK: England and Wales)
  • 250.9 (United States)
Robbery

  • 137.0 (UK: England and Wales)
  • 115.3 (United States)

Source:

United Nations

http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/CTS12_Assault.xls
http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/CTS12_Robbery.xls



Palestine seems to be only marginally more violent than rich first world countries comparing these stats that compare different things.



From the footer of the source you linked:

"
Please note that when using the figures, any cross-national comparisons should be conducted with caution because of the differences that exist between the legal definitions of offences in countries, or the different methods of offence counting and recording."


"assault" or affray etc in the UK can mean swearing at someone. I'm sure that's not the only cross border legal inconsistency.
 
Palestine seems to be only marginally more violent than rich first world countries comparing these stats that compare different things.



From the footer of the source you linked:

"
Please note that when using the figures, any cross-national comparisons should be conducted with caution because of the differences that exist between the legal definitions of offences in countries, or the different methods of offence counting and recording."


"assault" or affray etc in the UK can mean swearing at someone. I'm sure that's not the only cross border legal inconsistency.

These statistics are based on violent crimes that resulted in arrests, which is the only reliable way to measure them. That is why Palestine and other third world results are skewed. Luckily we are comparing first world countries eh? As for your inconsistency dilemma, assault can also mean verbal assault in the United States, so the two stand on equal ground. Nice deflection attempt though ;)
 
t
These statistics are based on violent crimes that resulted in arrests, which is the only reliable way to measure them. That is why Palestine and other third world results are skewed. Luckily we are comparing first world countries eh? As for your inconsistency dilemma, assault can also mean verbal assault in the United States, so the two stand on equal ground. Nice deflection attempt though ;)

The document you posted says the opposite of that in the footnote.

It's meaningless, also see the US crime survey or wikipedia for US definition of violent crime its not the same at all.

You're 5x more likely to be murdered in the USA.
 
Just for clarification, I'm 100% for gun rights.

I'm 100% against a police state.

Well according to Naomi Klein, lefty feminist, the USA is already a police state, and she's upset about it. See:

The coming drone attack on America | Naomi Wolf | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

People often ask me, in terms of my argument about "ten steps" that mark the descent to a police state or closed society, at what stage we are. I am sorry to say that with the importation of what will be tens of thousands of drones, by both US military and by commercial interests, into US airspace, with a specific mandate to engage in surveillance and with the capacity for weaponization – which is due to begin in earnest at the start of the new year – it means that the police state is now officially here.

...We don't need a military takeover: with these capabilities on US soil and this air force white paper authorization for data collection, the military will be effectively in control of the private lives of American citizens. And these drones are not yet weaponized.

"I don't think it's crazy to worry about weaponized drones. There is a real consensus that has emerged against allowing weaponized drones domestically. The International Association of Chiefs of Police has recommended against it," warns Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the ACLU, noting that there is already political pressure in favor of weaponization

...What can we do if we want to oppose this? I wondered. According to Stanley, many states are passing legislation banning domestic drone use. Once again, in the fight to keep America a republic, grassroots activism is pitched in an unequal contest against a militarized federal government.

And on that gloomy note, Merry Christmas everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottspfd82
Yes, I agree. South Central Los Angeles is a view of the future, where everyone is stoned all of the time, and nobody ever gets shot.

South Central Los Angeles does not exist anymore. The name had too many negative connotations due to it being all fucked up. Then we figured out a really cheap way to solve the problem...change the name to South Los Angeles!